These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38132811)

  • 61. Numerical analyses of biomechanical behavior of various orthodontic anchorage implants.
    Stahl E; Keilig L; Abdelgader I; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    J Orofac Orthop; 2009 Mar; 70(2):115-27. PubMed ID: 19322530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Biomechanical influence of crown-to-implant ratio on stress distribution over internal hexagon short implant: 3-D finite element analysis with statistical test.
    Ramos Verri F; Santiago Junior JF; de Faria Almeida DA; de Oliveira GB; de Souza Batista VE; Marques Honório H; Noritomi PY; Pellizzer EP
    J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 25435384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Evaluation of multiple implant-bone parameters on stress characteristics in the mandible under traumatic loading conditions.
    Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):461-72. PubMed ID: 20556244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Parafunctional loading and occlusal device on stress distribution around implants: A 3D finite element analysis.
    Borges Radaelli MT; Idogava HT; Spazzin AO; Noritomi PY; Boscato N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):565-572. PubMed ID: 29724560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Influence of different implant designs on replacement of four teeth of the posterior free-end edentulism: Three-dimensional finite element analysis and clinic case validation.
    Ye Z; Ye H; Jiang Z; Wu S; Feng Z; Liu H; Wang X; Lan R; Lin X; Ding C; Zhang Q; Ding X; Wu L
    Ann Anat; 2023 Aug; 249():152111. PubMed ID: 37247761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Evaluation of optimal taper of immediately loaded wide-diameter implants: a finite element analysis.
    Atieh MA; Shahmiri RA
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 21905902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Mechanical micromodeling of stress-shielding at the bone-implant interphase under shear loading.
    Hériveaux Y; Le Cann S; Fraulob M; Vennat E; Nguyen VH; Haïat G
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2022 Nov; 60(11):3281-3293. PubMed ID: 36169903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Mechanical property of Ti6Al4V cylindrical porous structure for dental implants fabricated by selective laser melting.
    Zhai Y; Zhang H; Liu T; Zou C; Zhou C
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2024 Jan; ():1-19. PubMed ID: 38178700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Effect of different biocompatible implant materials on the mechanical stability of dental implants under excessive oblique load.
    Bataineh K; Al Janaideh M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Dec; 21(6):1206-1217. PubMed ID: 31670872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Predicting Peri-implant Stresses Around Titanium and Zirconium Dental Implants-A Finite Element Analysis.
    Gujjarlapudi MC; Nunna NV; Manne SD; Sarikonda VR; Madineni PK; Meruva RN
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2013 Sep; 13(3):196-204. PubMed ID: 24431734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Biomechanical Comparison of Six Different Root-Analog Implants and the Conventional Morse Taper Implant by Finite Element Analysis.
    Wang JQ; Zhang Y; Pang M; Wang YQ; Yuan J; Peng H; Zhang W; Dai L; Li HW
    Front Genet; 2022; 13():915679. PubMed ID: 35769992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
    Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Anisotropic elasticity of cortical and cancellous bone in the posterior mandible increases peri-implant stress and strain under oblique loading.
    O'Mahony AM; Williams JL; Spencer P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Dec; 12(6):648-57. PubMed ID: 11737110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Finite element analysis and experimental evaluation on stress distribution and sensitivity of dental implants to assess optimum length and thread pitch.
    Pirmoradian M; Naeeni HA; Firouzbakht M; Toghraie D; Khabaz MK; Darabi R
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Apr; 187():105258. PubMed ID: 31830699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Biomechanical consequences of progressive marginal bone loss around oral implants: a finite element stress analysis.
    Akca K; Cehreli MC
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2006 Jul; 44(7):527-35. PubMed ID: 16937188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Predicting time-dependent remodeling of bone around immediately loaded dental implants with different designs.
    Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jan; 32(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 19884034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Design of dental implant using design of experiment and topology optimization: A finite element analysis study.
    Gupta Y; Iyer R; Dommeti VK; Nutu E; Rana M; Merdji A; Biswas JK; Roy S
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Feb; 235(2):157-166. PubMed ID: 33094686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Selection of optimal dental implant diameter and length in type IV bone: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Li T; Kong L; Wang Y; Hu K; Song L; Liu B; Li D; Shao J; Ding Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 38(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 19656657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
    Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.