These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38133392)

  • 1. Risk Assessment of Isoeugenol in Food Based on Benchmark Dose-Response Modeling.
    Quentin T; Franke H; Lachenmeier DW
    Toxics; 2023 Dec; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 38133392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does EU legislation allow the use of the Benchmark Dose (BMD) approach for risk assessment?
    Brandon EF; Bulder AS; van Engelen JG; Mahieu CM; Mennes WC; Pronk ME; Rietveld AG; van de Ven BM; Ten Voorde SE; Wolterink G; Slob W; Zeilmaker MJ; Bessems JG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Nov; 67(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 23871753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of a site-specific reference dose for methylmercury for fish-eating populations.
    Shipp AM; Gentry PR; Lawrence G; Van Landingham C; Covington T; Clewell HJ; Gribben K; Crump K
    Toxicol Ind Health; 2000 Nov; 16(9-10):335-438. PubMed ID: 11762928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the benchmark dose for point of departure determination for a variety of chemical classes in applied regulatory settings.
    Izadi H; Grundy JE; Bose R
    Risk Anal; 2012 May; 32(5):830-5. PubMed ID: 22126138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A weight of evidence evaluation of the mode of action of isoeugenol.
    Brock WJ; Greene T; Van Landingham C; Gentry R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2024 Jun; 150():105642. PubMed ID: 38735521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of benchmark dose methodology for non-cancer continuous-data health effects in animals due to exposures to dioxin (TCDD).
    Gaylor DW; Aylward LL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Aug; 40(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 15265602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Introduction to benchmark dose methods and U.S. EPA's benchmark dose software (BMDS) version 2.1.1.
    Davis JA; Gift JS; Zhao QJ
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2011 Jul; 254(2):181-91. PubMed ID: 21034758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using the BMD Approach to Derive Acceptable Daily Intakes of Cannabidiol (CBD) and Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) Relevant to Electronic Cigarette Liquids.
    Hindelang P; Scharinger A; Richling E; Walch SG; Lachenmeier DW
    Front Biosci (Landmark Ed); 2022 Jul; 27(8):228. PubMed ID: 36042166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of benchmark dose and meta-analysis to determine the most sensitive endpoint for risk assessment for dimethoate.
    Reiss R; Gaylor D
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Oct; 43(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 16099569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Carcinogenic, ethanol, acetaldehyde and noncarcinogenic higher alcohols, esters, and methanol compounds found in traditional alcoholic beverages. A risk assessment approach.
    Kokkinakis M; Tsakiris I; Tzatzarakis M; Vakonaki E; Alegakis A; Papachristou S; Karzi V; Kokkinaki A; Goumenou M; Kallionakis M; Kalogeraki A
    Toxicol Rep; 2020; 7():1057-1065. PubMed ID: 32923372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Probabilistic risk assessment of exposure to leucomalachite green residues from fish products.
    Chu YL; Chimeddulam D; Sheen LY; Wu KY
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2013 Dec; 62():770-6. PubMed ID: 24140969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Application of the benchmark dose approach to epidemiological endpoints with clinical standards].
    Murata K; Karita K; Horiguchi H; Iwata T; Hirose A
    Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2011; 53(3):67-77. PubMed ID: 21467775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Complex mixtures: relevance of combined exposure to substances at low dose levels.
    Leeman WR; Krul L; Houben GF
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2013 Aug; 58():141-8. PubMed ID: 23597445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A broader view on deriving a reference dose for THC traces in foods.
    Beitzke B; Pate DW
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2021 Sep; 51(8):695-722. PubMed ID: 35174773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of individual and combined estrogenic effects of bisphenol, nonylphenol and diethylstilbestrol in immature rats with mathematical models.
    Mao W; Song Y; Sui H; Cao P; Liu Z
    Environ Health Prev Med; 2019 May; 24(1):32. PubMed ID: 31084616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of subchronic toxicity data using the benchmark dose approach.
    Gephart LA; Salminen WF; Nicolich MJ; Pelekis M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Feb; 33(1):37-59. PubMed ID: 11259178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.