156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38133514)
41. Automated assessment of the optic nerve head on stereo disc photographs.
Xu J; Ishikawa H; Wollstein G; Bilonick RA; Sung KR; Kagemann L; Townsend KA; Schuman JS
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jun; 49(6):2512-7. PubMed ID: 18326698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A Deep Learning Algorithm to Quantify Neuroretinal Rim Loss From Optic Disc Photographs.
Thompson AC; Jammal AA; Medeiros FA
Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 201():9-18. PubMed ID: 30689990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Glaucoma follow-up by the Heidelberg retina tomograph--new graphical analysis of optic disc topography changes.
Kalaboukhova L; Fridhammar V; Lindblom B
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006 Jun; 244(6):654-62. PubMed ID: 16220279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. From Machine to Machine: An OCT-Trained Deep Learning Algorithm for Objective Quantification of Glaucomatous Damage in Fundus Photographs.
Medeiros FA; Jammal AA; Thompson AC
Ophthalmology; 2019 Apr; 126(4):513-521. PubMed ID: 30578810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of vertical cup-to-disc ratio estimates using stereoscopic and monoscopic cameras.
Shrestha R; Budenz DL; Mwanza JC; Tulenko SE; Fleischman D; Gower EW
Eye (Lond); 2021 Dec; 35(12):3318-3324. PubMed ID: 33514892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Improving cone-beam CT quality using a cycle-residual connection with a dilated convolution-consistent generative adversarial network.
Deng L; Zhang M; Wang J; Huang S; Yang X
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Jul; 67(14):. PubMed ID: 35728794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Accurate, fast, data efficient and interpretable glaucoma diagnosis with automated spatial analysis of the whole cup to disc profile.
MacCormick IJC; Williams BM; Zheng Y; Li K; Al-Bander B; Czanner S; Cheeseman R; Willoughby CE; Brown EN; Spaeth GL; Czanner G
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209409. PubMed ID: 30629635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Factors affecting the sensitivity and specificity of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph parameters to glaucomatous progression in disc photographs.
Saarela V; Falck A; Airaksinen PJ; Tuulonen A
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 90(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 20346079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Variance owing to observer, repeat imaging, and fundus camera type on cup-to-disc ratio estimates by stereo planimetry.
Kwon YH; Adix M; Zimmerman MB; Piette S; Greenlee EC; Alward WL; Abràmoff MD
J Glaucoma; 2009; 18(4):305-10. PubMed ID: 19365196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Deep learning on fundus images detects glaucoma beyond the optic disc.
Hemelings R; Elen B; Barbosa-Breda J; Blaschko MB; De Boever P; Stalmans I
Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):20313. PubMed ID: 34645908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison of automated analysis of Cirrus HD OCT spectral-domain optical coherence tomography with stereo photographs of the optic disc.
Sharma A; Oakley JD; Schiffman JC; Budenz DL; Anderson DR
Ophthalmology; 2011 Jul; 118(7):1348-57. PubMed ID: 21397334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. RimNet: A Deep Neural Network Pipeline for Automated Identification of the Optic Disc Rim.
Rasheed HA; Davis T; Morales E; Fei Z; Grassi L; De Gainza A; Nouri-Mahdavi K; Caprioli J
Ophthalmol Sci; 2023 Mar; 3(1):100244. PubMed ID: 36545262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A Precise Method to Evaluate 360 Degree Measures of Optic Cup and Disc Morphology in an African American Cohort and Its Genetic Applications.
Addis V; Chen M; Zorger R; Salowe R; Daniel E; Lee R; Pistilli M; Gao J; Maguire MG; Chan L; Gudiseva HV; Zenebe-Gete S; Merriam S; Smith EJ; Martin R; Parker Ostroff C; Gee JC; Cui QN; Miller-Ellis E; O'Brien JM; Sankar PS
Genes (Basel); 2021 Dec; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 34946910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Ranking of optic disc variables for detection of glaucomatous optic nerve damage.
Jonas JB; Bergua A; Schmitz-Valckenberg P; Papastathopoulos KI; Budde WM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1764-73. PubMed ID: 10845597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Multimodal image translation via deep learning inference model trained in video domain.
Fan J; Liu Z; Yang D; Qiao J; Zhao J; Wang J; Hu W
BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Jul; 22(1):124. PubMed ID: 35836126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Texture transformer super-resolution for low-dose computed tomography.
Zhou S; Yu L; Jin M
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2022 Nov; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 36301699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Agreement between Fourier-domain and swept-source optical coherence tomography used for optic nerve head measurements.
Kudsieh B; Fernandez-Vigo JI; De-Pablo-Gómez-de-Liaño L; Fernández-Vigo C; Ruiz Moreno JM; Fernández-Vigo JÁ
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2020 Jan; 43(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 31733916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Smartphone-based Ophthalmic Imaging Compared With Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography Assessment of Vertical Cup-to-disc Ratio Among Adults in Southwestern Uganda.
Idriss BR; Tran TM; Atwine D; Chang RT; Myung D; Onyango J
J Glaucoma; 2021 Mar; 30(3):e90-e98. PubMed ID: 33394852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The agreement between the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph and a digital nonmydriatic retinal camera in assessing area cup-to-disc ratio.
Lamoureux EL; Lo K; Ferraro JG; Constantinou M; Keeffe JE; Müller A; Taylor HR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jan; 47(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 16384949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. CBCT-to-CT Translation Using Registration-Based Generative Adversarial Networks in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.
Suwanraksa C; Bridhikitti J; Liamsuwan T; Chaichulee S
Cancers (Basel); 2023 Mar; 15(7):. PubMed ID: 37046678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
