These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38134629)

  • 1. The puzzle of wrongless injustice: Reflections on Kürthy and Sousa.
    Royzman EB; Borislow SH
    Cognition; 2024 Mar; 244():105686. PubMed ID: 38134629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The deflationary model of harm and moral wrongdoing: A rejoinder to Royzman & Borislow.
    Kürthy M; Sousa P
    Cognition; 2024 Mar; 244():105599. PubMed ID: 38267135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The puzzle of wrongless harms: Some potential concerns for dyadic morality and related accounts.
    Royzman EB; Borislow SH
    Cognition; 2022 Mar; 220():104980. PubMed ID: 34990961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The myth of harmless wrongs in moral cognition: Automatic dyadic completion from sin to suffering.
    Gray K; Schein C; Ward AF
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Aug; 143(4):1600-15. PubMed ID: 24635184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling Morality in 3-D: Decision-Making, Judgment, and Inference.
    Yu H; Siegel JZ; Crockett MJ
    Top Cogn Sci; 2019 Apr; 11(2):409-432. PubMed ID: 31042018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Empathy and structural injustice in the assessment of patient noncompliance.
    Wilson Y
    Bioethics; 2022 Mar; 36(3):283-289. PubMed ID: 34969154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The affective harm account (AHA) of moral judgment: Reconciling cognition and affect, dyadic morality and disgust, harm and purity.
    Gray K; MacCormack JK; Henry T; Banks E; Schein C; Armstrong-Carter E; Abrams S; Muscatell KA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2022 Dec; 123(6):1199-1222. PubMed ID: 35357881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wrong or merely prohibited: Special treatment of strict liability in intuitive moral judgment.
    Giffin C; Lombrozo T
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):707-720. PubMed ID: 27631401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Moral Judgments of COVID-19 Social Distancing Violations: The Roles of Perceived Harm and Impurity.
    Rosenfeld DL; Tomiyama AJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2022 May; 48(5):766-781. PubMed ID: 34247528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: testing three principles of harm.
    Cushman F; Young L; Hauser M
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Dec; 17(12):1082-9. PubMed ID: 17201791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unsentimental ethics: towards a content-specific account of the moral-conventional distinction.
    Royzman EB; Leeman RF; Baron J
    Cognition; 2009 Jul; 112(1):159-74. PubMed ID: 19439283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Puzzle of Evaluating Moral Cognition in Artificial Agents.
    Reinecke MG; Mao Y; Kunesch M; Duéñez-Guzmán EA; Haas J; Leibo JZ
    Cogn Sci; 2023 Aug; 47(8):e13315. PubMed ID: 37555649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Empathy and motivation for justice: Cognitive empathy and concern, but not emotional empathy, predict sensitivity to injustice for others.
    Decety J; Yoder KJ
    Soc Neurosci; 2016; 11(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 25768232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Principles of moral accounting: How our intuitive moral sense balances rights and wrongs.
    Johnson SGB; Ahn J
    Cognition; 2021 Jan; 206():104467. PubMed ID: 33129053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making.
    Bartels DM
    Cognition; 2008 Aug; 108(2):381-417. PubMed ID: 18486121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The rise of moral cognition.
    Greene JD
    Cognition; 2015 Feb; 135():39-42. PubMed ID: 25498900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm.
    Schein C; Gray K
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2018 Feb; 22(1):32-70. PubMed ID: 28504021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A person-centered approach to moral judgment.
    Uhlmann EL; Pizarro DA; Diermeier D
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Jan; 10(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 25910382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Moral cognition in schizophrenia.
    McGuire J; Langdon R; Brüne M
    Cogn Neuropsychiatry; 2014; 19(6):495-508. PubMed ID: 24963651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of the human prefrontal cortex in social cognition and moral judgment.
    Forbes CE; Grafman J
    Annu Rev Neurosci; 2010; 33():299-324. PubMed ID: 20350167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.