BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3813863)

  • 21. Preliminary evaluation of the Cognitive and Linguistic Scale: a measure to assess recovery in inpatient rehabilitation following pediatric brain injury.
    Slomine B; Eikenberg J; Salorio C; Suskauer S; Trovato M; Christensen J
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2008; 23(5):286-93. PubMed ID: 18815505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Early rehabilitative treatment in patients with traumatic brain injuries: outcome at one-year follow-up.
    Mammi P; Zaccaria B; Franceschini M
    Eura Medicophys; 2006 Mar; 42(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16565681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Functional outcomes and quality of life in patients with brain tumors: a preliminary report.
    Huang ME; Wartella JE; Kreutzer JS
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Nov; 82(11):1540-6. PubMed ID: 11689973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Usefulness of the abbreviated injury score and the injury severity score in comparison to the Glasgow Coma Scale in predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury.
    Foreman BP; Caesar RR; Parks J; Madden C; Gentilello LM; Shafi S; Carlile MC; Harper CR; Diaz-Arrastia RR
    J Trauma; 2007 Apr; 62(4):946-50. PubMed ID: 17426553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Long-latency auditory-evoked potentials in severe traumatic brain injury.
    Mazzini L; Zaccala M; Gareri F; Giordano A; Angelino E
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Jan; 82(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 11239287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Neuropsychologic and functional outcome after complicated mild traumatic brain injury.
    Kashluba S; Hanks RA; Casey JE; Millis SR
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 May; 89(5):904-11. PubMed ID: 18452740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Spanish version of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98: reliability and validity.
    Fonseca F; Bulbena A; Navarrete R; Aragay N; Capo M; Lobo A; Trzepacz PT
    J Psychosom Res; 2005 Sep; 59(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 16198187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Development and standardization of the Self-regulation Skills Interview (SRSI): a new clinical assessment tool for acquired brain injury.
    Ownsworth TL; McFarland KM; Young RM
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2000 Feb; 14(1):76-92. PubMed ID: 10855062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Rehabilitation inpatient screening of early cognitive recovery.
    Barry P; Clark DE; Yaguda M; Higgins GE; Mangel H
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1989 Dec; 70(13):902-6. PubMed ID: 2596964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Construct validation of the Hoensbroeck Disability Scale for Brain Injury in acquired brain injury rehabilitation.
    Torenbeek M; van der Heijden GJ; de Witte LP; Bakx WG
    Brain Inj; 1998 Apr; 12(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 9562913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Neuropsychological assessment and the Disability Rating Scale (DRS): a concurrent validity study.
    Neese LE; Caroselli JS; Klaas P; High WM; Becker LJ; Scheibel RS
    Brain Inj; 2000 Aug; 14(8):719-24. PubMed ID: 10969890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Using the levels of cognitive functioning assessment scale with patients with traumatic brain injury in an acute care setting.
    Flannery J
    Rehabil Nurs; 1998; 23(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 9668871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Supervision rating scale: a measure of functional outcome from brain injury.
    Boake C
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1996 Aug; 77(8):765-72. PubMed ID: 8702369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The neurobehavioural rating scale-revised: sensitivity and validity in closed head injury assessment.
    McCauley SR; Levin HS; Vanier M; Mazaux JM; Boake C; Goldfader PR; Rockers D; Butters M; Kareken DA; Lambert J; Clifton GL
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2001 Nov; 71(5):643-51. PubMed ID: 11606677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Primary end points in phase III clinical trials of severe head trauma: DRS versus GOS. The American Brain Injury Consortium Study Group.
    Choi SC; Marmarou A; Bullock R; Nichols JS; Wei X; Pitts LH
    J Neurotrauma; 1998 Oct; 15(10):771-6. PubMed ID: 9814633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Emotional and cognitive consequences of head injury in relation to the glasgow outcome scale.
    Wilson JT; Pettigrew LE; Teasdale GM
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2000 Aug; 69(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 10896694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Glasgow Outcome at Discharge Scale: an inpatient assessment of disability after brain injury.
    McMillan TM; Weir CJ; Ireland A; Stewart E
    J Neurotrauma; 2013 Jun; 30(11):970-4. PubMed ID: 23230909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing disability after head injury: improved use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale.
    Pettigrew LE; Wilson JT; Teasdale GM
    J Neurosurg; 1998 Dec; 89(6):939-43. PubMed ID: 9833819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Monitoring rate of recovery to predict outcome in minimally responsive patients.
    Giacino JT; Kezmarsky MA; DeLuca J; Cicerone KD
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1991 Oct; 72(11):897-901. PubMed ID: 1929808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reliability of ratings on the Glasgow Outcome Scales from in-person and telephone structured interviews.
    Pettigrew LE; Wilson JT; Teasdale GM
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2003; 18(3):252-8. PubMed ID: 12802167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.