These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38139576)

  • 1. Revisiting Classical Controller Design and Tuning with Genetic Programming.
    García CA; Velasco M; Angulo C; Marti P; Camacho A
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Dec; 23(24):. PubMed ID: 38139576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved model reduction and tuning of fractional-order PI(λ)D(μ) controllers for analytical rule extraction with genetic programming.
    Das S; Pan I; Das S; Gupta A
    ISA Trans; 2012 Mar; 51(2):237-61. PubMed ID: 22036301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tuning Generalized Predictive PI controllers for process control applications.
    Briones O; Alarcón R; Rojas AJ; Sbarbaro D
    ISA Trans; 2022 Jan; 119():184-195. PubMed ID: 33678424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Logical genetic programming (LGP) application to water resources management.
    Ashofteh PS; Bozorg-Haddad O; Loáiciga HA
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Dec; 192(1):34. PubMed ID: 31828436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. IPDT Model-Based Ziegler-Nichols Tuning Generalized to Controllers with Higher-Order Derivatives.
    Bistak P; Huba M; Vrancic D; Chamraz S
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Apr; 23(8):. PubMed ID: 37112127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A graphical tuning method for fractional order controllers based on iso-slope phase curves.
    Muñoz J; Monje CA; Nagua LF; Balaguer C
    ISA Trans; 2020 Oct; 105():296-307. PubMed ID: 32493576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 2DOF multi-objective optimal tuning of disturbance reject fractional order PIDA controllers according to improved consensus oriented random search method.
    Ozbey N; Yeroglu C; Alagoz BB; Herencsar N; Kartci A; Sotner R
    J Adv Res; 2020 Sep; 25():159-170. PubMed ID: 32922983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive GSA-based optimal tuning of PI controlled servo systems with reduced process parametric sensitivity, robust stability and controller robustness.
    Precup RE; David RC; Petriu EM; Radac MB; Preitl S
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2014 Nov; 44(11):1997-2009. PubMed ID: 25330468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Object detection via feature synthesis using MDL-based genetic programming.
    Lin Y; Bhanu B
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2005 Jun; 35(3):538-47. PubMed ID: 15971921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disturbance-rejection-based tuning of proportional-integral-derivative controllers by exploiting closed-loop plant data.
    Jeng JC; Ge GP
    ISA Trans; 2016 May; 62():312-24. PubMed ID: 26922494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Flexible skill-based control for robot cells in manufacturing.
    Wiese T; Abicht J; Friedrich C; Hellmich A; Ihlenfeldt S
    Front Robot AI; 2022; 9():1014476. PubMed ID: 36246488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Data-based approach for feedback-feedforward controller design using closed-loop plant data.
    Jeng JC; Ge GP
    ISA Trans; 2018 Sep; 80():244-256. PubMed ID: 30041826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New tuning method for PID controller.
    Shen JC
    ISA Trans; 2002 Oct; 41(4):473-84. PubMed ID: 12398278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel auto-tuning method for fractional order PI/PD controllers.
    De Keyser R; Muresan CI; Ionescu CM
    ISA Trans; 2016 May; 62():268-75. PubMed ID: 26903289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interpretable PID parameter tuning for control engineering using general dynamic neural networks: An extensive comparison.
    Günther J; Reichensdörfer E; Pilarski PM; Diepold K
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243320. PubMed ID: 33301494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. IMC based robust PI/PID controllers for time-delayed inverse response processes.
    Irshad M; Ali A
    ISA Trans; 2023 Mar; 134():278-289. PubMed ID: 36154776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A simple approach to lifetime learning in genetic programming-based symbolic regression.
    Azad RM; Ryan C
    Evol Comput; 2014; 22(2):287-317. PubMed ID: 24079729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. State-of-art of genetic programming applications in water-resources systems analysis.
    Mohammad-Azari S; Bozorg-Haddad O; Loáiciga HA
    Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Jan; 192(2):73. PubMed ID: 31897756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An Arithmetic-Trigonometric Optimization Algorithm with Application for Control of Real-Time Pressure Process Plant.
    Devan PAM; Hussin FA; Ibrahim RB; Bingi K; Nagarajapandian M; Assaad M
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jan; 22(2):. PubMed ID: 35062578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simultaneous online automatic tuning of cascade control for open loop stable processes.
    Tan KK; Lee TH; Ferdous R
    ISA Trans; 2000; 39(2):233-42. PubMed ID: 10871217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.