134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38139631)
1. Impact of Partially Automated Driving Functions on Forensic Accident Reconstruction: A Simulator Study on Driver Reaction Behavior in the Event of a Malfunctioning System Behavior.
Paula D; Bauder M; Pfeilschifter C; Petermeier F; Kubjatko T; Böhm K; Riener A; Schweiger HG
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Dec; 23(24):. PubMed ID: 38139631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck.
Poland K; McKay MP; Bruce D; Becic E
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S153-S156. PubMed ID: 30841795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance.
Naujoks F; Höfling S; Purucker C; Zeeb K
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():28-42. PubMed ID: 30205284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Driver Vigilance Decrement is More Severe During Automated Driving than Manual Driving.
Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
Hum Factors; 2024 Feb; 66(2):574-588. PubMed ID: 35624552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In a heart beat: Using driver's physiological changes to determine the quality of a takeover in highly automated vehicles.
Alrefaie MT; Summerskill S; Jackon TW
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Oct; 131():180-190. PubMed ID: 31302486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Driver behavior and the use of automation in real-world driving.
Gershon P; Seaman S; Mehler B; Reimer B; Coughlin J
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Aug; 158():106217. PubMed ID: 34087506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Study on driver's active emergency response in dangerous traffic scenes based on driving simulator.
Ma S; Xu S; Song J; Wang K; Qin H; Wang R
Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(2):116-121. PubMed ID: 38019530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the impact of on-road partially-automated driving on drivers' cognitive workload and attention allocation.
Biondi FN; Jajo N
Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jun; 200():107537. PubMed ID: 38471237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Driver-initiated take-overs during critical braking maneuvers in automated driving - The role of time headway, traction usage, and trust in automation.
Becker S; Brandenburg S; Thüring M
Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106725. PubMed ID: 35878555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improvement of driver active interventions during automated driving by displaying trajectory pointers-A driving simulator study.
Ono S; Sasaki H; Kumon H; Fuwamoto Y; Kondo S; Narumi T; Tanikawa T; Hirose M
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S152-S156. PubMed ID: 31381449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Keeping the driver in the loop through semi-automated or manual lane changes in conditionally automated driving.
Dillmann J; den Hartigh RJR; Kurpiers CM; Pelzer J; Raisch FK; Cox RFA; de Waard D
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Nov; 162():106397. PubMed ID: 34563644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of car driver responses to avoid car-to-cyclist perpendicular collisions based on drive recorder data and driving simulator experiments.
Zhao Y; Miyahara T; Mizuno K; Ito D; Han Y
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105862. PubMed ID: 33276185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of effects of driver's evasive action time on rear-end collision risk using a driving simulator.
Shah D; Lee C
J Safety Res; 2021 Sep; 78():242-250. PubMed ID: 34399920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Drivers of partially automated vehicles are blamed for crashes that they cannot reasonably avoid.
Beckers N; Siebert LC; Bruijnes M; Jonker C; Abbink D
Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):16193. PubMed ID: 36171437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Driver-initiated take-overs during critical evasion maneuvers in automated driving.
Becker S; Brandenburg S; Thüring M
Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jan; 194():107362. PubMed ID: 37931430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing Drivers' Trust of Automated Vehicle Driving Styles With a Two-Part Mixed Model of Intervention Tendency and Magnitude.
Lee JD; Liu SY; Domeyer J; DinparastDjadid A
Hum Factors; 2021 Mar; 63(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 31596618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Examining the Effects of Visibility and Time Headway on the Takeover Risk during Conditionally Automated Driving.
Peng H; Chen F; Chen P
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct; 19(21):. PubMed ID: 36360784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of motor control requirements on drivers' eye-gaze pattern during automated driving.
Goncalves RC; Louw TL; Quaresma M; Madigan R; Merat N
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105788. PubMed ID: 33039820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
