These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38141012)

  • 1. Contingency learning on the proportional congruency effect of the Stroop task is manifest in deviant processing.
    Suzuki K
    Neuroreport; 2024 Feb; 35(3):170-174. PubMed ID: 38141012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sequential Congruency Effects of Reverse Stroop Interference on Event-Related Potential Components for Go- and Nogo-Stimuli.
    Suzuki K
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():678647. PubMed ID: 34393906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory conflict processing: behavioral and electrophysiologic manifestations of the stroop effect.
    Henkin Y; Yaar-Soffer Y; Gilat S; Muchnik C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(7):474-86. PubMed ID: 20807483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What is cued by faces in the face-based context-specific proportion congruent manipulation?
    Hutcheon T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 May; 84(4):1248-1263. PubMed ID: 35174463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Item-specific control of attention in the Stroop task: Contingency learning is not the whole story in the item-specific proportion-congruent effect.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Apr; 48(3):426-435. PubMed ID: 31705394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of contingency and correlation in the Stroop task.
    Hasshim N; Parris BA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Oct; 74(10):1657-1668. PubMed ID: 34190618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An ERP investigation of the working memory stroop effect.
    Wang W; Qi M; Gao H
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Feb; 152():107752. PubMed ID: 33453265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The interactive effects of listwide control, item-based control, and working memory capacity on Stroop performance.
    Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):851-60. PubMed ID: 21517220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of positions on deviant processing in mostly incompatible blocks in the flanker task.
    Suzuki K
    Psychophysiology; 2024 Mar; 61(3):e14509. PubMed ID: 38149484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time-frequency analysis of the event-related potentials associated with the Stroop test.
    Ergen M; Saban S; Kirmizi-Alsan E; Uslu A; Keskin-Ergen Y; Demiralp T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Dec; 94(3):463-72. PubMed ID: 25135670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proactive control in the Stroop task: A conflict-frequency manipulation free of item-specific, contingency-learning, and color-word correlation confounds.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1550-1562. PubMed ID: 32150437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Context-specific proportion congruent effects: Compound-cue contingency learning in disguise.
    Schmidt JR; Lemercier C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 May; 72(5):1119-1130. PubMed ID: 29926760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Common and specific loci of Stroop effects in vocal and manual tasks, revealed by event-related brain potentials and posthypnotic suggestions.
    Zahedi A; Abdel Rahman R; Stürmer B; Sommer W
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Sep; 148(9):1575-1594. PubMed ID: 30730196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conflict-monitoring theory in overtime: Is temporal learning a viable explanation for the congruency sequence effect?
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 May; 48(5):497-530. PubMed ID: 35389710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Event-related potential indices of congruency sequence effects without feature integration or contingency learning confounds.
    Larson MJ; Clayson PE; Kirwan CB; Weissman DH
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jun; 53(6):814-22. PubMed ID: 26854028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of mild head injury on event-related potential correlates of Stroop task performance.
    Potter DD; Jory SH; Bassett MR; Barrett K; Mychalkiw W
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2002 Sep; 8(6):828-37. PubMed ID: 12240747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ERP correlates of dual mechanisms of control in the counting Stroop task.
    West R; Bailey K
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Oct; 49(10):1309-18. PubMed ID: 22958264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple expectancies underlie the congruency sequence effect in confound-minimized tasks.
    Erb CD; Aschenbrenner AJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102869. PubMed ID: 31228719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revisiting congruency effects in the working memory Stroop task.
    Pan Y; Zhang Z; Hu X; Zuo W
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jul; 84(5):1635-1650. PubMed ID: 35501589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines.
    Lorentz E; McKibben T; Ekstrand C; Gould L; Anton K; Borowsky R
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():386. PubMed ID: 27014177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.