122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38142177)
1. Assessment of Transplant Renal Artery Stenosis with Non-contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography.
Pan L; Shen L; Fan M; Xing Z; Ding J; Du Y; Guo S; Chen J; Xing W
Acad Radiol; 2024 Jun; 31(6):2405-2411. PubMed ID: 38142177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: a reliable clinical tool for evaluating transplant renal artery stenosis.
Zhang LJ; Peng J; Wen J; Schoepf UJ; Varga-Szemes A; Griffith LP; Yu YM; Tao SM; Li YJ; Ni XF; Xu J; Shi DH; Lu GM
Eur Radiol; 2018 Oct; 28(10):4195-4204. PubMed ID: 29666993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomographic angiography and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant transplant renal artery stenosis.
Gaddikeri S; Mitsumori L; Vaidya S; Hippe DS; Bhargava P; Dighe MK
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2014; 43(4):162-8. PubMed ID: 24948209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of ferumoxytol-enhanced MRA with conventional angiography for assessment of severity of transplant renal artery stenosis.
Fananapazir G; Bashir MR; Corwin MT; Lamba R; Vu CT; Troppmann C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Mar; 45(3):779-785. PubMed ID: 27504713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Non-contrast-enhanced MRA of renal artery stenosis: validation against DSA in a porcine model.
Bley TA; François CJ; Schiebler ML; Wieben O; Takei N; Brittain JH; Del Rio AM; Grist TM; Reeder SB
Eur Radiol; 2016 Feb; 26(2):547-55. PubMed ID: 26017736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ECG-gated nonenhanced 3D steady-state free precession MR angiography in assessment of transplant renal arteries: comparison with DSA.
Lanzman RS; Voiculescu A; Walther C; Ringelstein A; Bi X; Schmitt P; Freitag SM; Won S; Scherer A; Blondin D
Radiology; 2009 Sep; 252(3):914-21. PubMed ID: 19635833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Renal artery stenosis: comparative evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MRA and DSA.
Stacul F; Gava S; Belgrano M; Cernic S; Pagnan L; Pozzi Mucelli F; Cova MA
Radiol Med; 2008 Jun; 113(4):529-46. PubMed ID: 18480971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of non-breath-hold high resolution gadolinium-enhanced MRA with digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation on allograft renal artery stenosis.
Chan YL; Leung CB; Yu SC; Yeung DK; Li PK
Clin Radiol; 2001 Feb; 56(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 11222071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Renal artery assessment with non-enhanced MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography: comparison between 1.5 and 3.0 T.
Guo X; Gong Y; Wu Z; Yan F; Ding X; Xu X
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1747-1754. PubMed ID: 31797079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image Quality and Stenosis Assessment of Non-Contrast-Enhanced 3-T Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease Compared with Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography.
Liu J; Zhang N; Fan Z; Luo N; Zhao Y; Bi X; An J; Chen Z; Liu D; Wen Z; Fan Z; Li D
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166467. PubMed ID: 27861626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the aortoiliac vessels using a 1.0 molar contrast agent at 1.0 T with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography].
Mohrs OK; Oberholzer K; Krummenauer F; Bernhard S; Kalden P; Neufang A; Thelen M; Kreitner KF
Rofo; 2004 Jul; 176(7):985-91. PubMed ID: 15237341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ECG-triggered non-enhanced MR angiography of peripheral arteries in comparison to DSA in patients with peripheral artery occlusive disease.
Partovi S; Rasmus M; Schulte AC; Rengier F; Jacob AL; Aschwanden M; Karmonik C; Bongartz G; Bilecen D
MAGMA; 2013 Jun; 26(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 23117342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Highly accelerated compressed sensing time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography may be reliable for diagnosing head and neck arterial steno-occlusive disease: a comparative study with digital subtraction angiography.
Zhang X; Cao YZ; Mu XH; Sun Y; Schmidt M; Forman C; Speier P; Lu SS; Hong XN
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jun; 30(6):3059-3065. PubMed ID: 32064562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 3D FIESTA pulse sequence for assessing renal artery stenosis: is it a reliable application in unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography?
Gaudiano C; Busato F; Ferramosca E; Cecchelli C; Corcioni B; De Sanctis LB; Santoro A; Golfieri R
Eur Radiol; 2014 Dec; 24(12):3042-50. PubMed ID: 25059677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imaging modalities for renal artery stenosis in suspected renovascular hypertension: prospective intraindividual comparison of color Doppler US, CT angiography, GD-enhanced MR angiography, and digital substraction angiography.
Rountas C; Vlychou M; Vassiou K; Liakopoulos V; Kapsalaki E; Koukoulis G; Fezoulidis IV; Stefanidis I
Ren Fail; 2007; 29(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 17497443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients.
Anzidei M; Napoli A; Zaccagna F; Di Paolo P; Saba L; Cavallo Marincola B; Zini C; Cartocci G; Di Mare L; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2012 Feb; 117(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 21424318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. One-stop preoperative assessment of renal vessels for living donors with 3.0 T non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: compared with computerized tomography angiography and surgical results.
Li X; Xia F; Chen L; Zhang X; Mo C; Shen W
Br J Radiol; 2021 Dec; 94(1128):20210589. PubMed ID: 34558306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stenosis detection in failing hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts: comparison of color Doppler ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.
Doelman C; Duijm LE; Liem YS; Froger CL; Tielbeek AV; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Cuypers PW; Douwes-Draaijer P; Buth J; van den Bosch HC
J Vasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 42(4):739-46. PubMed ID: 16242563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breath-hold 3D gadolinium-enhanced subtraction MRA in the detection of transplant renal artery stenosis.
Luk SH; Chan JH; Kwan TH; Tsui WC; Cheung YK; Yuen MK
Clin Radiol; 1999 Oct; 54(10):651-4. PubMed ID: 10541389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ECG-triggered non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography (TRANCE) versus digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease of the lower extremities.
Gutzeit A; Sutter R; Froehlich JM; Roos JE; Sautter T; Schoch E; Giger B; Wyss M; Graf N; von Weymarn C; Jenelten R; Binkert CA; Hergan K
Eur Radiol; 2011 Sep; 21(9):1979-87. PubMed ID: 21533632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
