These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38142616)

  • 21. Technical considerations in the use of polymethylmethacrylate in cranioplasty.
    Lara WC; Schweitzer J; Lewis RP; Odum BC; Edlich RF; Gampper TJ
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1998; 8(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 10177458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Polymethyl Methacrylate in Patient-Specific Implants: Description of a New Three-Dimension Technique.
    Ridwan-Pramana A; Idema S; Te Slaa S; Verver F; Wolff J; Forouzanfar T; Peerdeman S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019; 30(2):408-411. PubMed ID: 30676441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of the Surgical Outcomes of Cranioplasty Using Titanium, Customized Polymethylmethacrylate, and Liquid Polymethylmethacrylate in Maharaj Nakhon Chiang Mai Hospital, Thailand.
    Vongsfak J; Vaniyapong T; Norasethada T; Watcharasaksilp W; Jetjumnong C; Srihagulang C; Limpastan K
    J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 33(5):1521-1524. PubMed ID: 34999614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Long-term clinical outcome analysis of poly-methyl-methacrylate cranioplasty for large skull defects.
    Jaberi J; Gambrell K; Tiwana P; Madden C; Finn R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):e81-8. PubMed ID: 23351772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cranioplasty with custom-made implants: analyzing the cases of 10 patients.
    Rotaru H; Stan H; Florian IS; Schumacher R; Park YT; Kim SG; Chezan H; Balc N; Baciut M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):e169-76. PubMed ID: 22260919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Analysis of PMMA versus CaP titanium-enhanced implants for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a retrospective observational cohort study.
    Wesp D; Krenzlin H; Jankovic D; Ottenhausen M; Jägersberg M; Ringel F; Keric N
    Neurosurg Rev; 2022 Dec; 45(6):3647-3655. PubMed ID: 36222944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quantitative analysis of dual-purpose, patient-specific craniofacial implants for correction of temporal deformity.
    Zhong S; Huang GJ; Susarla SM; Swanson EW; Huang J; Gordon CR
    Neurosurgery; 2015 Jun; 11 Suppl 2():220-9; discussion 229. PubMed ID: 25710104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Customized and Cost-Effective 3D Printed Mold for Cranioplasty: India's First Single Center Experience.
    Gopal S; Rudrappa S; Sekar A; Preethish-Kumar V; Masapu D
    Neurol India; 2021; 69(3):611-617. PubMed ID: 34169853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Computer aided design of large-format prefabricated cranial plates.
    Dean D; Min KJ; Bond A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Nov; 14(6):819-32. PubMed ID: 14600623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Customized cranioplasty implants using three-dimensional printers and polymethyl-methacrylate casting.
    Kim BJ; Hong KS; Park KJ; Park DH; Chung YG; Kang SH
    J Korean Neurosurg Soc; 2012 Dec; 52(6):541-6. PubMed ID: 23346326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A novel economically viable solution for 3D printing-assisted cranioplast fabrication.
    Lal B; Ghosh M; Agarwal B; Gupta D; Roychoudhury A
    Br J Neurosurg; 2020 Jun; 34(3):280-283. PubMed ID: 32075447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reconstruction of large cranial defects with poly-methyl-methacrylate (PMMA) using a rapid prototyping model and a new technique for intraoperative implant modeling.
    Unterhofer C; Wipplinger C; Verius M; Recheis W; Thomé C; Ortler M
    Neurol Neurochir Pol; 2017; 51(3):214-220. PubMed ID: 28343651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Patient-specific polymethylmethacrylate prostheses for secondary reconstruction of large calvarial defects: A retrospective feasibility study of a new intraoperative moulding device for cranioplasty.
    Moser M; Schmid R; Schindel R; Hildebrandt G
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Feb; 45(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 28011181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cranioplasty with a low-cost customized polymethylmethacrylate implant using a desktop 3D printer.
    Morales-Gómez JA; Garcia-Estrada E; Leos-Bortoni JE; Delgado-Brito M; Flores-Huerta LE; De La Cruz-Arriaga AA; Torres-Díaz LJ; de León ÁRM
    J Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 130(5):1721-1727. PubMed ID: 29905512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Esthetic Occipital Augmentation With Computer-Aided Design-Computer-Aided Manufacturing Prefabricated Customized Polymethyl Methacrylate Implant: Comparison of Planned and Final Results.
    Ming-Chi Hsieh A; Kuan-Chou Lin C; Hou-Ren Jiang S; Seah TE
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jul; 78(7):1191.e1-1191.e8. PubMed ID: 32277939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cost-Effective Cranioplasty Utilizing 3D Printed Molds: A Canadian Single-Center Experience.
    Lannon M; Algird A; Alsunbul W; Wang BH
    Can J Neurol Sci; 2022 Mar; 49(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 33818332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Early experience with patient-specific low-cost 3D-printed polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty implants in a lower-middle-income-country: Technical note and economic analysis.
    Ashraf M; Choudhary N; Kamboh UA; Raza MA; Sultan KA; Ghulam N; Hussain SS; Ashraf N
    Surg Neurol Int; 2022; 13():270. PubMed ID: 35855120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A simplified technique for polymethyl methacrylate cranioplasty: combined cotton stacking and finger fracture method.
    Kung WM; Lin MS
    Brain Inj; 2012; 26(13-14):1737-42. PubMed ID: 22759077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Customized alloplastic cranioplasty of large bone defects by 3D-printed prefabricated mold template after posttraumatic decompressive craniectomy: A technical note.
    Splavski B; Lakicevic G; Kovacevic M; Godec D
    Surg Neurol Int; 2022; 13():169. PubMed ID: 35509538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Aesthetic outcome in patients after polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) cranioplasty - a questionnaire-based single-centre study.
    Fischer CM; Burkhardt JK; Sarnthein J; Bernays RL; Bozinov O
    Neurol Res; 2012 Apr; 34(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 22449405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.