130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38142752)
21. Diagnostic Value of Pelvic MRI for Assessment of the Depth of Myometrial Invasion and Cervical Involvement in Endometrial Cancer: Comparison of New Versus Old FIGO Staging.
Zamani F; Goodarzi S; Hallaji F; Zamiri A; Deilami T; Malek M; Modarress Gilani M
Iran J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 9(4):202-8. PubMed ID: 23407805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnostic performance of transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of low-grade endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: prospective comparative study.
Cubo-Abert M; Díaz-Feijoo B; Bradbury M; Rodríguez-Mías NL; Vera M; Pérez-Hoyos S; Gómez-Cabeza JJ; Gil-Moreno A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 58(3):469-475. PubMed ID: 33533532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Preoperative pelvic MRI and 2-[
Fasmer KE; Gulati A; Dybvik JA; Wagner-Larsen KS; Lura N; Salvesen Ø; Forsse D; Trovik J; Pijnenborg JMA; Krakstad C; Haldorsen IS
Eur Radiol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):221-232. PubMed ID: 35763096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracies of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of endometrial cancer.
Wong M; Amin T; Thanatsis N; Naftalin J; Jurkovic D
J Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 33(2):e22. PubMed ID: 35128854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: added benefits of MR imaging.
Beddy P; O'Neill AC; Yamamoto AK; Addley HC; Reinhold C; Sala E
Radiographics; 2012; 32(1):241-54. PubMed ID: 22236905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.
Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ;
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Structured reports of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging in primary endometrial cancer: Potential benefits for clinical decision-making.
Liu Y; Feng Z; Qin S; Yang J; Han C; Wang X
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213928. PubMed ID: 30908525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Magnetic resonance imaging in pre-operative staging of endometrial cancer.
Shrivastava S; Barmon D; Kataki AC; Deka P; Sharma JD; Choudhary BK; Baruah U
Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(1):181-5. PubMed ID: 27146774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quality and Value of Subspecialty Reinterpretation of Thoracic CT Scans of Patients Referred to a Tertiary Cancer Center.
Carter BW; Erasmus JJ; Truong MT; Shepard JO; Hofstetter W; Clarke R; Munden RF; Steele JR
J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 Aug; 14(8):1109-1118. PubMed ID: 28434844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Intraoperative frozen section assessment of myometrial invasion and histology of endometrial cancer using the revised FIGO staging system.
Ugaki H; Kimura T; Miyatake T; Ueda Y; Yoshino K; Matsuzaki S; Fujita M; Kimura T; Morii E; Enomoto T
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Oct; 21(7):1180-4. PubMed ID: 21795987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Value of fusion of PET and MRI for staging of endometrial cancer: comparison with ¹⁸F-FDG contrast-enhanced PET/CT and dynamic contrast-enhanced pelvic MRI.
Kitajima K; Suenaga Y; Ueno Y; Kanda T; Maeda T; Takahashi S; Ebina Y; Miyahara Y; Yamada H; Sugimura K
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):1672-6. PubMed ID: 23727380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prognostic value of preoperative metabolic tumor volume measured by ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in patients with endometrial cancer.
Chung HH; Lee I; Kim HS; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Cheon GJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Sep; 130(3):446-51. PubMed ID: 23791826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Value of magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma according to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2009) staging criteria].
Du L; Lei Y; Li D; Qiu X; Liang B
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2012 Jun; 32(7):1048-51. PubMed ID: 22820597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Second Opinion Expert Pathology in Endometrial Cancer: Potential Clinical Implications.
Grevenkamp F; Kommoss F; Kommoss F; Lax S; Fend F; Wallwiener D; Schönfisch B; Krämer B; Brucker SY; Taran FA; Staebler A; Kommoss S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Feb; 27(2):289-296. PubMed ID: 27922981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Endometrial cancer: results of clinical and histopathological staging compared to magnetic resonance imaging using an endorectal surface coil.
Brocker KA; Alt CD; Breyer U; Hallscheidt P; Sohn C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Apr; 289(4):851-8. PubMed ID: 24173171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic significance of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging scan in the presurgical determination of FIGO stage of endometrial cancer.
Djurdjevic S; Zivaljevic M; Semnic R; Ivanovic Lj
J BUON; 2010; 15(2):382-8. PubMed ID: 20658740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical Impact of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Myometrial Infiltration and Lymph-Node Metastases in Stage I Endometrial Cancer.
Bús D; Nagy G; Póka R; Vajda G
Pathol Oncol Res; 2021; 27():611088. PubMed ID: 34257578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Endometrial cancer: preoperative staging. The informative value of ultrasound study versus magnetic resonance imaging].
Rubtsova NA; Novicova EG; Sinitsyn VE; Vostrov AN; Stepanov SO
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2012; (4):33-41. PubMed ID: 23214028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Whole-body MRI compared with standard pathways for staging metastatic disease in lung and colorectal cancer: the Streamline diagnostic accuracy studies.
Taylor SA; Mallett S; Miles A; Morris S; Quinn L; Clarke CS; Beare S; Bridgewater J; Goh V; Janes S; Koh DM; Morton A; Navani N; Oliver A; Padhani A; Punwani S; Rockall A; Halligan S
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Dec; 23(66):1-270. PubMed ID: 31855148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
