84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3814303)
1. Interpathologist and intrapathologist disagreement in ovarian tumor grading and typing.
Baak JP; Langley FA; Talerman A; Delemarre JF
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1986 Dec; 8(4):354-7. PubMed ID: 3814303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Grading ovarian tumors. Evaluation of decision making by different pathologists.
Baak JP; Delemarre JF; Langley FA; Talerman A
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1986 Dec; 8(4):349-53. PubMed ID: 3814302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The prognostic variability of ovarian tumor grading by different pathologists.
Baak JP; Langley FA; Talerman A; Delemarre JF
Gynecol Oncol; 1987 Jun; 27(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 3570055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interobserver and intraobserver variability of a two-tier system for grading ovarian serous carcinoma.
Malpica A; Deavers MT; Tornos C; Kurman RJ; Soslow R; Seidman JD; Munsell MF; Gaertner E; Frishberg D; Silva EG
Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Aug; 31(8):1168-74. PubMed ID: 17667538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pathological classification and grading of primary ovarian carcinoma: experience of the ARTAC ovarian study group.
Vacher-Lavenu MC; Le Tourneau A; Duvillard P; Godefroy N; Pinel MC
Bull Cancer; 1993 Feb; 80(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 8173164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inter-pathologist and pathology report agreement for ovarian tumor characteristics in the Nurses' Health Studies.
Barnard ME; Pyden A; Rice MS; Linares M; Tworoger SS; Howitt BE; Meserve EE; Hecht JL
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 150(3):521-526. PubMed ID: 30001835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Observer variation in histologic classification of malignant and borderline ovarian tumors.
Stalsberg H; Abeler V; Blom GP; Bostad L; Skarland E; Westgaard G
Hum Pathol; 1988 Sep; 19(9):1030-5. PubMed ID: 3417288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Observer disagreement in histological classification of ovarian tumors in Japan.
Sakamoto A; Sasaki H; Furusato M; Suzuki M; Hirai Y; Tsugane S; Fukushima M; Terashima Y
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Jul; 54(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 8020839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tumor cell type can be reproducibly diagnosed and is of independent prognostic significance in patients with maximally debulked ovarian carcinoma.
Gilks CB; Ionescu DN; Kalloger SE; Köbel M; Irving J; Clarke B; Santos J; Le N; Moravan V; Swenerton K;
Hum Pathol; 2008 Aug; 39(8):1239-51. PubMed ID: 18602670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interobserver variability in the interpretation of epithelial ovarian cancer.
Hernandez E; Bhagavan BS; Parmley TH; Rosenshein NB
Gynecol Oncol; 1984 Jan; 17(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 6693048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproducibility and prognostic value of histologic type and grade in early epithelial ovarian cancer.
Bertelsen K; Hølund B; Andersen E
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 1993 Mar; 3(2):72-79. PubMed ID: 11578325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the histologic grading for ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma: a retrospective multi-institutional study by the Japan Clear Cell Carcinoma Study Group.
Yamamoto S; Kasajima A; Takano M; Yaegashi N; Fujiwara H; Kuzuya K; Kigawa J; Tsuda H; Kurachi H; Kikuchi Y; Sugiyama T; Tsuda H; Moriya T
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2011 Mar; 30(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 21293288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Disagreement of histopathological diagnosis of different pathologists in ovarian tumors-with some theoretical considerations.
Baak JP; Lindeman J; Overdiep SH; Langley FA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1982 Feb; 13(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 7060817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimum spanning tree analysis in advanced ovarian carcinoma. An investigation of sampling methods, reproducibility and correlation with histologic grade.
Brinkhuis M; Meijer GA; van Diest PJ; Schuurmans LT; Baak JP
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1997 Jun; 19(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 9196801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histologic grading of breast cancer: linkage of patient outcome with level of pathologist agreement.
Dalton LW; Pinder SE; Elston CE; Ellis IO; Page DL; Dupont WD; Blamey RW
Mod Pathol; 2000 Jul; 13(7):730-5. PubMed ID: 10912931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Further evaluation of reproducibility and prognostic value of histologic typing and grading in FIGO stage I ovarian cancer patients without systemic locoregional adjuvant treatment.
Brugghe J; Baak JP; Wiltshaw E; Fisher C
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 1995 Jul; 5(4):262-268. PubMed ID: 11578487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interobserver variability in the interpretation of tumor cell necrosis in uterine leiomyosarcoma.
Lim D; Alvarez T; Nucci MR; Gilks B; Longacre T; Soslow RA; Oliva E
Am J Surg Pathol; 2013 May; 37(5):650-8. PubMed ID: 23552382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproducibility of histopathological evaluation in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Clinical implications.
Lund B; Thomsen HK; Olsen J
APMIS; 1991 Apr; 99(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 2036219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interobserver agreement and accuracy of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy for histological grading of pancreatic cancer.
Larghi A; Correale L; Ricci R; Abdulkader I; Monges G; Iglesias-Garcia J; Giovannini M; Attili F; Vitale G; Hassan C; Costamagna G; Rindi G
Endoscopy; 2015 Apr; 47(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 25521572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Importance of histologic grading in the prognosis of epithelial ovarian carcinoma.
Sorbe B; Frankendal B; Veress B
Obstet Gynecol; 1982 May; 59(5):576-82. PubMed ID: 7070728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
