These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38143253)

  • 1. Accuracy of 3D facial scans: a comparison of three different scanning system in an in vivo study.
    Pellitteri F; Scisciola F; Cremonini F; Baciliero M; Lombardo L
    Prog Orthod; 2023 Dec; 24(1):44. PubMed ID: 38143253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the accuracy of digital face scans obtained by two different scanners.
    Pellitteri F; Brucculeri L; Spedicato GA; Siciliani G; Lombardo L
    Angle Orthod; 2021 Sep; 91(5):641-649. PubMed ID: 33826690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry: Comparison of the 3dMD and Bellus3D facial scanning systems with one another and with direct anthropometry.
    Liu J; Zhang C; Cai R; Yao Y; Zhao Z; Liao W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Dec; 160(6):862-871. PubMed ID: 34814981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of RGB-D camera-based and stereophotogrammetric facial scanners: a comparative study.
    Pan F; Liu J; Cen Y; Chen Y; Cai R; Zhao Z; Liao W; Wang J
    J Dent; 2022 Dec; 127():104302. PubMed ID: 36152954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of three-dimensional facial imaging captured with smartphone-based photogrammetry application in comparison to stereophotogrammetry system.
    Andrews J; Alwafi A; Bichu YM; Pliska BT; Mostafa N; Zou B
    Heliyon; 2023 May; 9(5):e15834. PubMed ID: 37180897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of low-cost alternative facial scanners: a prospective cohort study.
    Bartella AK; Laser J; Kamal M; Krause M; Neuhaus M; Pausch NC; Sander AK; Lethaus B; Zimmerer R
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Mar; 27(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 35249150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods.
    Kook MS; Jung S; Park HJ; Oh HK; Ryu SY; Cho JH; Lee JS; Yoon SJ; Kim MS; Shin HK
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 24954528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy and reproducibility of the DAVID SLS-2 scanner in three-dimensional facial imaging.
    Secher JJ; Darvann TA; Pinholt EM
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 45(10):1662-1670. PubMed ID: 28847623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional facial anatomy evaluation: Reliability of laser scanner consecutive scans procedure in comparison with stereophotogrammetry.
    Gibelli D; Pucciarelli V; Poppa P; Cummaudo M; Dolci C; Cattaneo C; Sforza C
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 46(10):1807-1813. PubMed ID: 30097408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Accuracy of Digital Face Scans Obtained from 3D Scanners: An In Vitro Study.
    Amornvit P; Sanohkan S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 16(24):. PubMed ID: 31842255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison between stereophotogrammetry and smartphone structured light technology for three-dimensional face scanning.
    D'Ettorre G; Farronato M; Candida E; Quinzi V; Grippaudo C
    Angle Orthod; 2022 May; 92(3):358-363. PubMed ID: 35015071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of a dual-structured light facial scanner and interexaminer reliability.
    Piedra-Cascón W; Meyer MJ; Methani MM; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):567-574. PubMed ID: 31918895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy between 2D Photography and Dual-Structured Light 3D Facial Scanner for Facial Anthropometry: A Clinical Study.
    Cascos R; Ortiz Del Amo L; Álvarez-Guzmán F; Antonaya-Martín JL; Celemín-Viñuela A; Gómez-Costa D; Zafra-Vallejo M; Agustín-Panadero R; Gómez-Polo M
    J Clin Med; 2023 Apr; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 37176531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and reliability of 3D stereophotogrammetry: A comparison to direct anthropometry and 2D photogrammetry.
    Dindaroğlu F; Kutlu P; Duran GS; Görgülü S; Aslan E
    Angle Orthod; 2016 May; 86(3):487-94. PubMed ID: 26267357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vitro Comparison of Accuracy Between Three Different Face Scanning Modalities.
    Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Velidakis E
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2023 Aug; 31(3):296-307. PubMed ID: 36927828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 3D Anthropometric Facial Imaging - A comparison of different 3D scanners.
    Koban KC; Perko P; Li Z; Xu Y; Giunta RE; Alfertshofer MG; Kohler LH; Freytag DL; Cotofana S; Frank K
    Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2022 May; 30(2):149-158. PubMed ID: 35501052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the Accuracy, Reliability, and Reproducibility of Two Different 3D Face-Scanning Systems.
    Ye H; Lv L; Liu Y; Liu Y; Zhou Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 27148978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional scanners for soft-tissue facial assessment in clinical practice.
    Petrides G; Clark JR; Low H; Lovell N; Eviston TJ
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Mar; 74(3):605-614. PubMed ID: 33082078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anthropometric Comparison of 3-Dimensional Facial Scan Taken With a Low-Cost Facial Scanner With Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scan.
    Aljawad H; Lim HJ; Lee KC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 34(5):1456-1458. PubMed ID: 36731044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chairside virtual patient protocol. Part 1: Free vs Guided face scan protocol.
    Raffone C; Gianfreda F; Bollero P; Pompeo MG; Miele G; Canullo L
    J Dent; 2022 Jan; 116():103881. PubMed ID: 34762986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.