These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38143630)

  • 1. The Outcomes of Revision Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Using a Stand-Alone Implant Versus Traditional Interbody Polyetheretherketone Cage, Titanium Plate, and Screw Instrumentation.
    Alhammoud A; Korytkowski PD; Lavelle WF; Tallarico RA
    Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e49246. PubMed ID: 38143630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for Patients with Cervical Adjacent Segment Disease Treated with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Integrated Interbody Spacers.
    Zaidi SE; Venkatraman V; Sykes DAW; Albanese J; Erickson MM; Crutcher CL; Goodwin CR; Groff MW; Grossi P; Than KD; Haglund MM; Abd-El-Barr MM
    World Neurosurg; 2023 Dec; 180():e514-e522. PubMed ID: 37774788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiographic Fusion Rates Following a Stand-alone Interbody Cage Versus an Anterior Plate Construct for Adjacent Segment Disease After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.
    Gandhi SD; Fahs AM; Wahlmeier ST; Louie P; Possley DR; Khalil JG; Park DK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Jun; 45(11):713-717. PubMed ID: 31977677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stand-Alone Cage Versus Anterior Plating for 1-Level and 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Zavras AG; Nolte MT; Sayari AJ; Singh K; Colman MW
    Clin Spine Surg; 2022 May; 35(4):155-165. PubMed ID: 35394961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with ACDF using cage and plate in the treatment of three-level cervical degenerative spondylopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up.
    Chen Y; Lü G; Wang B; Li L; Kuang L
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2255-62. PubMed ID: 26906171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of a new zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage and anterior cervical plate for single and multilevel ACDF: a minimum 2-year follow-up study.
    Li Z; Zhao Y; Tang J; Ren D; Guo J; Wang H; Li L; Hou S
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Apr; 26(4):1129-1139. PubMed ID: 27554353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device: a clinical and radiological study: Clinical article.
    Njoku I; Alimi M; Leng LZ; Shin BJ; James AR; Bhangoo S; Tsiouris AJ; Härtl R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):529-37. PubMed ID: 25105338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of zero-profile device for contiguous three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparison with cage and plate construct.
    Chen Z; Cen S; Wu J; Guo R; Liu Z; Gao L
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Jun; 35(2):219-226. PubMed ID: 34087791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Efficacy comparison of zero-profile intervertebral fusion and stand-alone interbody cage combined with cage-titanium plate construct in treatment of two-segment skip cervical spondylosis].
    Xia BC; Sun JG; Huang SL; Tian LY; Zhu YH; Pi GF
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 May; 102(19):1450-1457. PubMed ID: 35599410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stand-Alone Cervical Cages in 2-Level Anterior Interbody Fusion in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Results from a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.
    Ng EP; Yip AS; Wan KH; Tse MS; Wong KK; Kwok TK; Wong WC
    Asian Spine J; 2019 Apr; 13(2):225-232. PubMed ID: 30472820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors affecting sagittal malalignment due to cage subsidence in standalone cage assisted anterior cervical fusion.
    Barsa P; Suchomel P
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Sep; 16(9):1395-400. PubMed ID: 17221174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Zero-profile Device Versus Plate-and-Cage Implant in the Treatment of Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Disease after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up Study.
    Shen Y; Du W; Wang LF; Dong Z; Wang F
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Jul; 115():e226-e232. PubMed ID: 29654956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative Study of Functional Outcome of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Interbody Fusion With Tricortical Stand-Alone Iliac Crest Autograft Versus Stand-Alone Polyetheretherketone Cage in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.
    Sharma A; Kishore H; Singh V; Shawky Abdelgawaad A; Sinha S; Kamble PC; Jorule K; Agrawal R; Mathapati S; Deepak P
    Global Spine J; 2018 Dec; 8(8):860-865. PubMed ID: 30560039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does rigid instrumentation increase the fusion rate in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?
    Samartzis D; Shen FH; Lyon C; Phillips M; Goldberg EJ; An HS
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6):636-43. PubMed ID: 15541695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Retrospective Evaluation and Review of Outcomes for Single- and Multilevel ACDF With a Zero-Profile Stand-Alone Cage Device With Integrated Instrumentation.
    Khalifeh K; Faulkner JE; Hara J; Ozgur B
    Cureus; 2021 Apr; 13(4):e14283. PubMed ID: 33959461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With a Stand-Alone Interbody Cage Versus a Conventional Cage-Plate Technique: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Cheung ZB; Gidumal S; White S; Shin J; Phan K; Osman N; Bronheim R; Vargas L; Kim JS; Cho SK
    Global Spine J; 2019 Jun; 9(4):446-455. PubMed ID: 31218204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion performed using structural allograft or polyetheretherketone: pseudarthrosis and revision surgery rates with minimum 2-year follow-up.
    Wang M; Chou D; Chang CC; Hirpara A; Liu Y; Chan AK; Pennicooke B; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Dec; 32(4):562-569. PubMed ID: 31835252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is the Zero-P Spacer Suitable for 3-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery in Terms of Sagittal Alignment Reconstruction: A Comparison Study with Traditional Plate and Cage System.
    Guo J; Jin W; Shi Y; Guan Z; Wen J; Huang Y; Yu B
    Brain Sci; 2022 Nov; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 36421907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of a self-locking stand-alone cage and anterior cervical plate for ACDF: Minimum 3-year assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes.
    Zhou J; Li J; Lin H; Li X; Zhou X; Dong J
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2018 Jul; 170():73-78. PubMed ID: 29734112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device reduces rate of adjacent-level ossification development and dysphagia compared to ACDF with plating and cage system.
    Yang H; Chen D; Wang X; Yang L; He H; Yuan W
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 Jun; 135(6):781-7. PubMed ID: 25851405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.