These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38145242)

  • 1. A practical revealed preference model for separating preferences and availability effects in marriage formation.
    Goyal S; Handcock MS; Jackson HM; Rendall MS; Yeung FC
    J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc; 2023 Oct; 186(4):682-706. PubMed ID: 38145242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stable Matching with Uncertain Linear Preferences.
    Aziz H; Biró P; Gaspers S; de Haan R; Mattei N; Rastegari B
    Algorithmica; 2020; 82(5):1410-1433. PubMed ID: 32214575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fish in the sea: Number, characteristics, and partner preferences of unmarried Japanese adults - analysis of a national survey.
    Ghaznavi C; Sakamoto H; Nomura S; Kubota A; Yoneoka D; Shibuya K; Ueda P
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0262528. PubMed ID: 35108292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Equilibrium population dynamics when mating is by mutual choice based on age.
    Alpern S; Katrantzi I; Ramsey D
    Theor Popul Biol; 2014 Jun; 94():63-72. PubMed ID: 23541396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Population Preferences for Primary Care Models for Hypertension in Karnataka, India.
    Leslie HH; Babu GR; Dolcy Saldanha N; Turcotte-Tremblay AM; Ravi D; Kapoor NR; Shapeti SS; Prabhakaran D; Kruk ME
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Mar; 6(3):e232937. PubMed ID: 36917109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.
    Merner B; Schonfeld L; Virgona A; Lowe D; Walsh L; Wardrope C; Graham-Wisener L; Xafis V; Colombo C; Refahi N; Bryden P; Chmielewski R; Martin F; Messino NM; Mussared A; Smith L; Biggar S; Gill M; Menzies D; Gaulden CM; Earnshaw L; Arnott L; Poole N; Ryan RE; Hill S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Mar; 3(3):CD013274. PubMed ID: 36917094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Young women's preferences for market work: responses to marital events.
    Spitze GD; Waite LJ
    Res Popul Econ; 1981; 3():147-66. PubMed ID: 12265058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Partnership Status, Health, and Mortality: Selection or Protection?
    Kulu H; Mikolai J; Franke S
    Demography; 2024 Feb; 61(1):189-207. PubMed ID: 38226410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A dynamic model of the marriage market-part 1: matching algorithm based on age preference and availability.
    Matthews AP; Garenne ML
    Theor Popul Biol; 2013 Sep; 88():78-85. PubMed ID: 23357512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient preferences for depression treatment programs and willingness to pay for treatment.
    Morey E; Thacher JA; Craighead WE
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2007 Jun; 10(2):73-85. PubMed ID: 17603148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contrasting Computational Models of Mate Preference Integration Across 45 Countries.
    Conroy-Beam D; Buss DM; Asao K; Sorokowska A; Sorokowski P; Aavik T; Akello G; Alhabahba MM; Alm C; Amjad N; Anjum A; Atama CS; Duyar DA; Ayebare R; Batres C; Bendixen M; Bensafia A; Bizumic B; Boussena M; Butovskaya M; Can S; Cantarero K; Carrier A; Cetinkaya H; Croy I; Cueto RM; Czub M; Dronova D; Dural S; Duyar I; Ertugrul B; Espinosa A; Estevan I; Esteves CS; Fang L; Frackowiak T; Garduño JC; González KU; Guemaz F; Gyuris P; Halamová M; Herak I; Horvat M; Hromatko I; Hui CM; Jaafar JL; Jiang F; Kafetsios K; Kavčič T; Kennair LEO; Kervyn N; Thi Khanh Ha T; Khilji IA; Köbis NC; Lan HM; Láng A; Lennard GR; León E; Lindholm T; Thi Linh T; Lopez G; Van Luot N; Mailhos A; Manesi Z; Martinez R; McKerchar SL; Meskó N; Misra G; Monaghan C; Mora EC; Moya-Garófano A; Musil B; Natividade JC; Niemczyk A; Nizharadze G; Oberzaucher E; Oleszkiewicz A; Omar-Fauzee MS; Onyishi IE; Özener B; Pagani AF; Pakalniskiene V; Parise M; Pazhoohi F; Pisanski A; Pisanski K; Ponciano E; Popa C; Prokop P; Rizwan M; Sainz M; Salkičević S; Sargautyte R; Sarmány-Schuller I; Schmehl S; Sharad S; Siddiqui RS; Simonetti F; Stoyanova SY; Tadinac M; Varella MAC; Vauclair CM; Vega LD; Widarini DA; Yoo G; Zaťková M; Zupančič M
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16885. PubMed ID: 31729413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceived roles, benefits and barriers of virtual global health partnership initiatives: a cross-sectional exploratory study.
    Umphrey L; Paasi G; Windsor W; Abongo G; Evert J; Haq H; Keating EM; Lam SK; McHenry MS; Ndila C; Nwobu C; Rule A; Tam RP; Olson D; Olupot-Olupot P
    Glob Health Res Policy; 2022 Apr; 7(1):11. PubMed ID: 35478077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How Are Mate Preferences Linked with Actual Mate Selection? Tests of Mate Preference Integration Algorithms Using Computer Simulations and Actual Mating Couples.
    Conroy-Beam D; Buss DM
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0156078. PubMed ID: 27276030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Promoting HIV Testing by Men: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Elicit Preferences and Predict Uptake of Community-based Testing in Uganda.
    Schaffer EM; Gonzalez JM; Wheeler SB; Kwarisiima D; Chamie G; Thirumurthy H
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2020 Jun; 18(3):413-432. PubMed ID: 31981135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Netherlands Fertility Survey 1982: age of the woman at first marriage and at first birth by social variables].
    Van Hoorn WD
    Maandstat Bevolking; 1985 Nov; 33(11):35-45. PubMed ID: 12280323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.
    Truglio-Londrigan M; Slyer JT; Singleton JK; Worral P
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2012; 10(58):4633-4646. PubMed ID: 27820528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MateSim: Monte Carlo simulation for the generation of mating tables.
    Carvajal-Rodríguez A
    Biosystems; 2018 Sep; 171():26-30. PubMed ID: 30005998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From Individual to Population Preferences: Comparison of Discrete Choice and Dirichlet Models for Treatment Benefit-Risk Tradeoffs.
    Tervonen T; Pignatti F; Postmus D
    Med Decis Making; 2019 Oct; 39(7):879-885. PubMed ID: 31496357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.