These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38145516)

  • 1. Decoupling Judgment and Decision Making: A Tale of Two Tails.
    Oral B; Dragicevic P; Telea A; Dimara E
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2023 Dec; PP():. PubMed ID: 38145516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Action and Inaction in Moral Judgments and Decisions: Meta-Analysis of Omission Bias Omission-Commission Asymmetries.
    Yeung SK; Yay T; Feldman G
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2022 Oct; 48(10):1499-1515. PubMed ID: 34496694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How environmental regularities affect people's information search in probability judgments from experience.
    Hoffart JC; Rieskamp J; Dutilh G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):219-231. PubMed ID: 30024248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The powerful influence of marks: Visual and knowledge-driven processing in hurricane track displays.
    Padilla LMK; Creem-Regehr SH; Thompson W
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Mar; 26(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 31556644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual Reasoning Strategies for Effect Size Judgments and Decisions.
    Kale A; Kay M; Hullman J
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2021 Feb; 27(2):272-282. PubMed ID: 33048681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of AI errors in a human-in-the-loop process.
    Agudo U; Liberal KG; Arrese M; Matute H
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 Jan; 9(1):1. PubMed ID: 38185767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uncertain About Uncertainty: How Qualitative Expressions of Forecaster Confidence Impact Decision-Making With Uncertainty Visualizations.
    Padilla LMK; Powell M; Kay M; Hullman J
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():579267. PubMed ID: 33564298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "Simultaneously Vague and Oddly Specific": Understanding Autistic People's Experiences of Decision Making and Research Questionnaires.
    Stacey R; Cage E
    Autism Adulthood; 2023 Sep; 5(3):263-274. PubMed ID: 37663447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hunger Bias or Gut Instinct? Responses to Judgments of Harm Depending on Visceral State Versus Intuitive Decision-Making.
    Brown H; Proulx MJ; Stanton Fraser D
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2261. PubMed ID: 33041900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. People's conditional probability judgments follow probability theory (plus noise).
    Costello F; Watts P
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Sep; 89():106-33. PubMed ID: 27570097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparisons, mental models, and the action effect in judgments of regret.
    Feeney A; Handley SJ
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Oct; 34(7):1422-30. PubMed ID: 17263067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Examining Effort in 1D Uncertainty Communication Using Individual Differences in Working Memory and NASA-TLX.
    Castro SC; Quinan PS; Hosseinpour H; Padilla L
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2022 Jan; 28(1):411-421. PubMed ID: 34587043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do inconclusive forensic decisions disadvantage the innocent?
    Madon S; Burd KA; Guyll M
    Law Hum Behav; 2024 Feb; 48(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 38573703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Taking a Disagreeing Perspective Improves the Accuracy of People's Quantitative Estimates.
    Van de Calseyde PPFM; Efendić E
    Psychol Sci; 2022 Jun; 33(6):971-983. PubMed ID: 35648655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual and Cognitive Judgments Show Both Anchoring and Repulsion.
    Spicer J; Zhu JQ; Chater N; Sanborn AN
    Psychol Sci; 2022 Sep; 33(9):1395-1407. PubMed ID: 35876741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Moral Judgments of Human vs. AI Agents in Moral Dilemmas.
    Zhang Y; Wu J; Yu F; Xu L
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2023 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 36829410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing bias in frequency judgment by improving source monitoring.
    Dougherty MR; Franco-Watkins AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2003 May; 113(1):23-44. PubMed ID: 12679042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jul; 121(3):463-80. PubMed ID: 25090427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
    Stacey D; Légaré F; Col NF; Bennett CL; Barry MJ; Eden KB; Holmes-Rovner M; Llewellyn-Thomas H; Lyddiatt A; Thomson R; Trevena L; Wu JH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jan; (1):CD001431. PubMed ID: 24470076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.