These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38145516)

  • 21. Judgment and Decision Making.
    Fischhoff B; Broomell SB
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2020 Jan; 71():331-355. PubMed ID: 31337275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intuitions of probabilities shape expectations about the future at 12 months and beyond.
    Téglás E; Girotto V; Gonzalez M; Bonatti LL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Nov; 104(48):19156-9. PubMed ID: 18025482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Causal beliefs and empirical evidence.
    Müller SM; Garcia-Retamero R; Cokely E; Maldonado A
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(4):324-32. PubMed ID: 21310692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Wisdom of crowds and collective decision-making in a survival situation with complex information integration.
    Hamada D; Nakayama M; Saiki J
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Oct; 5(1):48. PubMed ID: 33057843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Duration perception of visual and auditory oddball stimuli: does judgment task modulate the temporal oddball effect?
    Birngruber T; Schröter H; Ulrich R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Apr; 76(3):814-28. PubMed ID: 24435899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Concurrent explanations can enhance visual decision making.
    Leisti T; Radun J; Virtanen T; Nyman G; Häkkinen J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jan; 145():65-74. PubMed ID: 24301018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The impact of AI errors in a human-in-the-loop process.
    Agudo U; Liberal KG; Arrese M; Matute H
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 Jan; 9(1):1. PubMed ID: 38185767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of evidence reliability on sensitivity and bias in decision confidence.
    Boldt A; de Gardelle V; Yeung N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1520-1531. PubMed ID: 28383959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The environmental malleability of base-rate neglect.
    Turpin MH; Meyers EA; Walker AC; Białek M; Stolz JA; Fugelsang JA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Apr; 27(2):385-391. PubMed ID: 32043220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A quantitative confidence signal detection model: 2. Confidence analysis.
    Yi Y; Wang W; Merfeld DM
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Sep; 122(3):904-921. PubMed ID: 31215314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Confidence judgments interfere with perceptual decision making.
    Double KS; Birney DP
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):14133. PubMed ID: 38898057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Not all Anchors Weigh Equally.
    Greenstein M; Velazquez A
    Exp Psychol; 2017 Nov; 64(6):398-405. PubMed ID: 29268677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Examining Effort in 1D Uncertainty Communication Using Individual Differences in Working Memory and NASA-TLX.
    Castro SC; Quinan PS; Hosseinpour H; Padilla L
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2022 Jan; 28(1):411-421. PubMed ID: 34587043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Moral Judgment and Empathic/Deontological Guilt.
    Migliore S; D'Aurizio G; Parisi F; Maffi S; Squitieri B; Curcio G; Mancini F
    Psychol Rep; 2019 Aug; 122(4):1395-1411. PubMed ID: 30025498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Task-Based Taxonomy of Cognitive Biases for Information Visualization.
    Dimara E; Franconeri S; Plaisant C; Bezerianos A; Dragicevic P
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2020 Feb; 26(2):1413-1432. PubMed ID: 30281459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of memory in distinguishing risky decisions from experience and description.
    Madan CR; Ludvig EA; Spetch ML
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):2048-2059. PubMed ID: 27602887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Yielding to desire: the durability of affective preferences.
    Rapp DN; Jacovina ME; Slaten DG; Krause E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1419-31. PubMed ID: 24933694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Predicting similarity judgments in intertemporal choice with machine learning.
    Stevens JR; Soh LK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):627-635. PubMed ID: 29119404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inferring conjunctive probabilities from noisy samples: evidence for the configural weighted average model.
    Jenny MA; Rieskamp J; Nilsson H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):203-17. PubMed ID: 24128388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Are accurate witnesses more likely to make absolute judgments?
    Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Lemieux JM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008 Dec; 31(6):495-501. PubMed ID: 18954905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.