These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3814558)

  • 21. Impact of fetal blood sampling on vaginal delivery and neonatal outcome in deliveries complicated by pathologic fetal heart rate: a population based cohort study.
    Stein W; Hellmeyer L; Misselwitz B; Schmidt S
    J Perinat Med; 2006; 34(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 17140298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intrapartum fetal surveillance: the role of fetal scalp blood sampling.
    Clark SL; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Dec; 153(7):717-20. PubMed ID: 4073132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reliability of cardiotocography in predicting baby's condition at birth.
    Curzen P; Bekir JS; McLintock DG; Patel M
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Nov; 289(6455):1345-7. PubMed ID: 6437542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Neonatal outcome and delivery mode in labors with repetitive fetal scalp blood sampling.
    Holzmann M; Wretler S; Cnattingius S; Nordström L
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Jan; 184():97-102. PubMed ID: 25483990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fetal monitoring during labour.
    Sawers RS
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Dec; 287(6406):1649-50. PubMed ID: 6416534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a Swedish randomised controlled trial.
    Amer-Wåhlin I; Hellsten C; Norén H; Hagberg H; Herbst A; Kjellmer I; Lilja H; Lindoff C; Månsson M; Mårtensson L; Olofsson P; Sundström A; Marsál K
    Lancet; 2001 Aug; 358(9281):534-8. PubMed ID: 11520523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fetal recoil during labor to evaluate fetal well-being when heart rate monitoring is not informative.
    Elliott JP; Clewell WH; Hutson E
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 May; 89(5 Pt 2):800-2. PubMed ID: 9166325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Oxytocin-stressed and unstressed cardiotocograms for the prediction of fetal compromise.
    Homburg R; Ben-David M; Zakut H
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Jul; 89(7):516-9. PubMed ID: 7093164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Value of the Hammacher score and fetal blood analysis in subpartal monitoring of the child].
    Goeschen K; Gruner T; Saling E
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1984; 188(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 6538727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical usefulness of pulse oximetry in the fetus with non-reassuring heart rate pattern?
    Schmidt S; Koslowski S; Sierra F; Meyer-Wittkopf M; Heller G
    J Perinat Med; 2000; 28(4):298-305. PubMed ID: 11031700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fetal distress during labour in diabetic pregnancy.
    Olofsson P; Ingemarsson I; Solum T
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Oct; 93(10):1067-71. PubMed ID: 3790466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry compared with fetal heart rate monitoring as a labor admission test.
    Chan FY; Lam C; Lam YH; To WK; Pun TC; Lee CP
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1994 Mar; 54(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 8045327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The use of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: a national survey.
    Devane D; Lalor J; Bonnar J
    Ir Med J; 2007 Feb; 100(2):360-2. PubMed ID: 17432809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The use of intrapartum fetal blood lactate measurements for the early diagnosis of fetal distress.
    Eguiluz A; López Bernal A; McPherson K; Parrilla JJ; Abad L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Dec; 147(8):949-54. PubMed ID: 6650633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Foetal scalp blood sampling: impact on the incidence of Caesarean section and assisted vaginal deliveries for non-reassuring foetal heart rate and its use according to gestational age].
    Reif P; Haas J; Schöll W; Lang U
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2011 Oct; 215(5):194-8. PubMed ID: 22028059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Should pH scalp blood sampling still be done during labor?].
    Laplanche B; Brandel E; Magnin G
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1996; 25(6):612-6. PubMed ID: 8964960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cardiotocography as a predictor of fetal outcome in women presenting with reduced fetal movement.
    Daly N; Brennan D; Foley M; O'Herlihy C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 21899943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Critical analysis of the validity of electronic fetal monitoring.
    Jongsma HW; Nijhuis JG
    J Perinat Med; 1991; 19(1-2):33-7. PubMed ID: 1870054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fetal scalp blood sampling during labor: an appraisal of the physiological basis and scientific evidence.
    Chandraharan E; Wiberg N
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jun; 93(6):544-7. PubMed ID: 24806702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantitative cardiotocography to improve fetal assessment during labor: a preliminary randomized controlled trial.
    Ignatov PN; Lutomski JE
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():91-7. PubMed ID: 27567534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.