225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38145619)
21. Clinical outcomes from ART in predicted hyperresponders: in vitro maturation of oocytes versus conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI.
Mostinckx L; Goyens E; Mackens S; Roelens C; Boudry L; Uvin V; Segers I; Schoemans C; Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; De Vos M
Hum Reprod; 2024 Mar; 39(3):586-594. PubMed ID: 38177084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A multi-centre, retrospective case series of oocyte cryopreservation in unmarried women diagnosed with haematological malignancies.
Kato K; Ochi M; Nakamura Y; Kamiya H; Utsunomiya T; Yano K; Michikura Y; Hara T; Kyono K; Takeuchi K; Nakayama T; Iwamasa J; Mio Y; Kuramoto T; Nagata Y; Jo T; Asada Y; Ohishi H; Osada H; Yoshida H
Hum Reprod Open; 2021; 2021(1):hoaa064. PubMed ID: 33501384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Live birth and perinatal outcomes using cryopreserved oocytes: an analysis of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority database from 2000 to 2016 using three clinical models.
Mascarenhas M; Mehlawat H; Kirubakaran R; Bhandari H; Choudhary M
Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr; 36(5):1416-1426. PubMed ID: 33313698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cumulative live birth rate prognosis based on the number of aspirated oocytes in previous ART cycles.
Malchau SS; Henningsen AA; Forman J; Loft A; Nyboe Andersen A; Pinborg A
Hum Reprod; 2019 Jan; 34(1):171-180. PubMed ID: 30541039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reproductive choices and outcomes after freezing oocytes for medical reasons: a follow-up study.
Dahhan T; Dancet EA; Miedema DV; van der Veen F; Goddijn M
Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1925-30. PubMed ID: 24951490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. ICSI does not increase the cumulative live birth rate in non-male factor infertility.
Li Z; Wang AY; Bowman M; Hammarberg K; Farquhar C; Johnson L; Safi N; Sullivan EA
Hum Reprod; 2018 Jul; 33(7):1322-1330. PubMed ID: 29897449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of two different oocyte vitrification methods: a prospective, paired study on the same genetic background and stimulation protocol.
Pujol A; Zamora MJ; Obradors A; Garcia D; Rodriguez A; Vassena R
Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun; 34(6):989-997. PubMed ID: 31116386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fertility preservation in female oncology patients: the influence of the type of cancer on ovarian stimulation response.
Alvarez RM; Ramanathan P
Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):2051-2059. PubMed ID: 27370358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Live birth rate after female fertility preservation for cancer or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the three main techniques; embryo, oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation.
Fraison E; Huberlant S; Labrune E; Cavalieri M; Montagut M; Brugnon F; Courbiere B
Hum Reprod; 2023 Mar; 38(3):489-502. PubMed ID: 36421038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Assisted reproductive technology use and outcomes among women with a history of cancer.
Luke B; Brown MB; Missmer SA; Spector LG; Leach RE; Williams M; Koch L; Smith YR; Stern JE; Ball GD; Schymura MJ
Hum Reprod; 2016 Jan; 31(1):183-9. PubMed ID: 26577302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cumulative live birth rates for women returning to ART treatment for a second ART-conceived child.
Paul RC; Fitzgerald O; Lieberman D; Venetis C; Chambers GM
Hum Reprod; 2020 Jun; 35(6):1432-1440. PubMed ID: 32380547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Usage and cost-effectiveness of elective oocyte freezing: a retrospective observational study.
Yang IJ; Wu MY; Chao KH; Wei SY; Tsai YY; Huang TC; Chen MJ; Chen SU
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2022 Aug; 20(1):123. PubMed ID: 35974356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of cancer stage and grade on fertility preservation outcome and ovarian stimulation response.
Volodarsky-Perel A; Cohen Y; Arab S; Son WY; Suarthana E; Dahan MH; Tulandi T; Buckett W
Hum Reprod; 2019 Mar; 34(3):530-538. PubMed ID: 30689898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of oocyte donor stimulation on recipient outcomes: data from a US national donor oocyte bank.
Hipp HS; Gaskins AJ; Nagy ZP; Capelouto SM; Shapiro DB; Spencer JB
Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):847-858. PubMed ID: 32142582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cumulative live birth rate after IVF: trend over time and the impact of blastocyst culture and vitrification.
Saket Z; Källén K; Lundin K; Magnusson Å; Bergh C
Hum Reprod Open; 2021; 2021(3):hoab021. PubMed ID: 34195386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reproductive outcomes from ten years of elective oocyte cryopreservation.
Kasaven LS; Jones BP; Heath C; Odia R; Green J; Petrie A; Saso S; Serhal P; Nagi JB
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Nov; 306(5):1753-1760. PubMed ID: 35988095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Utilization of Cryopreserved Oocytes in Patients With Poor Ovarian Response After Planned Oocyte Cryopreservation.
Fouks Y; Sakkas D; Bortoletto PE; Penzias AS; Seidler EA; Vaughan DA
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Jan; 7(1):e2349722. PubMed ID: 38165675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Elective oocyte freezing for nonmedical reasons: a 6-year report on utilization and in vitro fertilization results from a Swedish center.
Wennberg AL; Schildauer K; Brännström M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Nov; 98(11):1429-1434. PubMed ID: 31173348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Oocyte matched follicular fluid anti-Müllerian hormone is an excellent predictor of live birth after fresh single embryo transfer.
Ciepiela P; Dulęba AJ; Kario A; Chełstowski K; Branecka-Woźniak D; Kurzawa R
Hum Reprod; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2244-2253. PubMed ID: 31725884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Oocyte vitrification as an efficient option for elective fertility preservation.
Cobo A; García-Velasco JA; Coello A; Domingo J; Pellicer A; Remohí J
Fertil Steril; 2016 Mar; 105(3):755-764.e8. PubMed ID: 26688429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
