139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38145620)
1. Influence of second premolar extractions on the volume of the oral cavity proper: a control comparative cone-beam computed tomography volumetric analysis study.
Mladenovic M; Freezer S; Dreyer C; Meade MJ
Angle Orthod; 2024 Jan; 94(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 38145620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The orthodontic extraction of second premolars: The influence on airway volume.
Mladenovic M; Freezer S; Dreyer C; Meade MJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 Jul; 166(1):61-68. PubMed ID: 38678455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transverse implications of maxillary premolar extraction in Class III presurgical orthodontic treatment.
Lee SJ; Kim TW; Nahm DS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):740-8. PubMed ID: 16769492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 1: differences between premolar extraction and nonextraction treatment outcomes.
Meyer AH; Woods MG; Manton DJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 24485736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An occlusal and cephalometric analysis of maxillary first and second premolar extraction effects.
Ong HB; Woods MG
Angle Orthod; 2001 Apr; 71(2):90-102. PubMed ID: 11302594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Arch width changes in extraction and nonextraction treatment in class I patients.
Aksu M; Kocadereli I
Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):948-52. PubMed ID: 16448236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of orthodontic treatment with preadjusted edgewise appliances on the buccolingual inclination of mandibular canines: a CBCT study.
Hamdan HA; Grünheid T; Larson BE
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Aug; 18(3):156-64. PubMed ID: 25824723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Arch-width and perimeter changes in patients with borderline Class I malocclusion treated with extractions or without extractions with air-rotor stripping.
Germec-Cakan D; Taner TU; Akan S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jun; 137(6):734.e1-7; discussion 734-5. PubMed ID: 20685525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relapse of anterior crowding in patients treated with extraction and nonextraction of premolars.
Erdinc AE; Nanda RS; Işiksal E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):775-84. PubMed ID: 16769496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anterior tooth alignment and arch dimensions changes: 37-year follow-up in patients treated with and without premolar extraction.
Cotrin P; Gambardela-Tkacz CM; Moura W; Iunes A; Janson G; Freitas MR; Freitas KMS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Oct; 158(4):e5-e15. PubMed ID: 32843251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion after extraction and nonextraction treatment.
Bishara SE; Cummins DM; Zaher AR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Jan; 111(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 9009919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparisons of the dental arch changes in patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusions: extraction vs nonextraction treatments.
Bishara SE; Bayati P; Zaher AR; Jakobsen JR
Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(5):351-8. PubMed ID: 7802329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of orthodontic treatment and premolar extractions on the mandibular third molars.
Celikoglu M; Kamak H; Akkast I; Oktay H
Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):160-4. PubMed ID: 21175026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Arch widths after extraction and nonextraction treatment in class I patients.
Golwalkar SA; Shetty V
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):312-5. PubMed ID: 23811665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does upper premolar extraction affect the changes of pharyngeal airway volume after bimaxillary surgery in skeletal class III patients?
Kim MA; Park YH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):165.e1-10. PubMed ID: 24331568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vertical facial and dental arch dimensional changes in extraction vs. non-extraction orthodontic treatment.
Kumari M; Fida M
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Jan; 20(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 20141687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of maxillary buccal alveolar bone before and after orthodontic alignment without extractions: A cone beam computed tomographic study.
Morais JF; Melsen B; de Freitas KMS; Castello Branco N; Garib DG; Cattaneo PM
Angle Orthod; 2018 Nov; 88(6):748-756. PubMed ID: 29911904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A cone-beam computed tomography study of root canal morphology of maxillary and mandibular premolars in a Turkish population.
Ok E; Altunsoy M; Nur BG; Aglarci OS; Çolak M; Güngör E
Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Nov; 72(8):701-6. PubMed ID: 24832561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Etiologic factors for buccal and palatal maxillary canine impaction: a perspective based on cone-beam computed tomography analyses.
Yan B; Sun Z; Fields H; Wang L; Luo L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):527-34. PubMed ID: 23561415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of first and second premolar extractions on third molars: A retrospective longitudinal study.
Miclotte A; Grommen B; Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M; Verdonck A; Jacobs R; Willems G
J Dent; 2017 Jun; 61():55-66. PubMed ID: 28359700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
