These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3814575)

  • 1. A comparison of cycloplegic and manifest refractions on the NR-1000F (an objective Auto Refractometer).
    Nayak BK; Ghose S; Singh JP
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1987 Jan; 71(1):73-5. PubMed ID: 3814575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Critical evaluation of the NR-1000F Auto Refractometer.
    Ghose S; Nayak BK; Singh JP
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1986 Mar; 70(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 3954981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of the NR-1000F Auto Refractometer in high refractive errors.
    Nayak BK; Ghose S; Singh JP
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1987 Sep; 71(9):682-4. PubMed ID: 3663561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of tropicamide and cyclopentolate for cycloplegic refractions in myopic adult refractive surgery patients.
    Hofmeister EM; Kaupp SE; Schallhorn SC
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Apr; 31(4):694-700. PubMed ID: 15899444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing homatropine and atropine in pediatric cycloplegic refractions.
    Shah BM; Sharma P; Menon V; Saxena R; Singh JP
    J AAPOS; 2011 Jun; 15(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 21777797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Agreement of wavefront-based refraction, dry and cycloplegic autorefraction with subjective refraction.
    Bamdad S; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Abdolahian M; Piñero DP
    J Optom; 2022; 15(1):100-106. PubMed ID: 32896507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pre- and Postcycloplegic Refractions in Children and Adolescents.
    Zhu D; Wang Y; Yang X; Yang D; Guo K; Guo Y; Jing X; Pan CW
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0167628. PubMed ID: 27907165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of age on peripheral refraction.
    Atchison DA; Pritchard N; White SD; Griffiths AM
    Vision Res; 2005 Mar; 45(6):715-20. PubMed ID: 15639498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of cycloplegia in objective refraction.
    Jorge J; Queiros A; González-Méijome J; Fernandes P; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jul; 25(4):340-5. PubMed ID: 15953119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between cycloplegic and wavefront-derived refraction.
    Fernández de Castro LE; Sandoval HP; Al Sarraf O; Vroman DT; Solomon KD
    J Refract Surg; 2003; 19(6):S677-81. PubMed ID: 14640434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of manifest refractions, cycloplegic refractions and retinoscopy on the RMA-3000 autorefractometer in children aged 3 to 15 years.
    Rotsos T; Grigoriou D; Kokkolaki A; Manios N
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2009; 3():429-31. PubMed ID: 19684866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening for refractive errors in children: accuracy of the hand held refractor Retinomax to screen for astigmatism.
    Cordonnier M; Dramaix M
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1999 Feb; 83(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 10396190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cycloplegic autorefraction versus subjective refraction: the Tehran Eye Study.
    Hashemi H; Khabazkhoob M; Asharlous A; Soroush S; Yekta A; Dadbin N; Fotouhi A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 100(8):1122-7. PubMed ID: 26541436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of refractive outcomes in myopic and hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis: Manifest versus aberrometric refraction.
    Reinstein DZ; Morral M; Gobbe M; Archer TJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1989-95. PubMed ID: 23079314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Difference of refraction values between standard autorefractometry and Plusoptix.
    Bogdănici CM; Săndulache CM; Vasiliu R; Obadă O
    Rom J Ophthalmol; 2016; 60(4):249-254. PubMed ID: 29450357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of noncycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction in categorizing refractive error data in children.
    Sankaridurg P; He X; Naduvilath T; Lv M; Ho A; Smith E; Erickson P; Zhu J; Zou H; Xu X
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 95(7):e633-e640. PubMed ID: 29110438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of internal refraction with the optical path difference scan.
    Muftuoglu O; Erdem U
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Jan; 115(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 18166405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prevalence of the refractive errors by age and gender: the Mashhad eye study of Iran.
    Ostadimoghaddam H; Fotouhi A; Hashemi H; Yekta A; Heravian J; Rezvan F; Ghadimi H; Rezvan B; Khabazkhoob M
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 39(8):743-51. PubMed ID: 21631683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Orthokeratology on myopia progression: twelve-year results of a retrospective cohort study.
    Lee YC; Wang JH; Chiu CJ
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):243. PubMed ID: 29216865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cycloplegic autorefraction in young adults: is it mandatory?
    Mimouni M; Zoller L; Horowitz J; Wygnanski-Jaffe T; Morad Y; Mezer E
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 254(2):395-8. PubMed ID: 26686513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.