126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38146824)
1. Multiscale Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetry in x-ray breast imaging: Part II - Microscopic scales.
Massera RT; Tomal A; Thomson RM
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1117-1126. PubMed ID: 38146824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiscale Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetry in x-ray breast imaging: Part I - Macroscopic scales.
Massera RT; Tomal A; Thomson RM
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1105-1116. PubMed ID: 38156766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Technical note: MC-GPU breast dosimetry validations with other Monte Carlo codes and phase space file implementation.
Massera RT; Thomson RM; Tomal A
Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 49(1):244-253. PubMed ID: 34778988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigating energy deposition in glandular tissues for mammography using multiscale Monte Carlo simulations.
Oliver PAK; Thomson RM
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1426-1436. PubMed ID: 30657190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric characterization and organ dose assessment in digital breast tomosynthesis: Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations using voxel phantoms.
Baptista M; Di Maria S; Barros S; Figueira C; Sarmento M; Orvalho L; Vaz P
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3788-800. PubMed ID: 26133581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparisons of glandular breast dose between digital mammography, tomosynthesis and breast CT based on anthropomorphic patient-derived breast phantoms.
Sarno A; Mettivier G; Bliznakova K; Hernandez AM; Boone JM; Russo P
Phys Med; 2022 May; 97():50-58. PubMed ID: 35395535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Updated breast CT dose coefficients (DgN
Hernandez AM; Becker AE; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1455-1466. PubMed ID: 30661250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of fibroglandular tissue distribution and breast shape in voxelized breast models for dosimetry in mammography.
Ferrauche G; Tramontin G; Massera RT; Tomal A
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Mar; 68(7):. PubMed ID: 36827710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Monte Carlo study on optimal breast voxel resolution for dosimetry estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Fedon C; Rabin C; Caballo M; Diaz O; García E; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; González-Sprinberg GA; Sechopoulos I
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Dec; 64(1):015003. PubMed ID: 30524034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of photoelectric cross section data on systematic uncertainties for Monte Carlo breast dosimetry in mammography.
Massera RT; Fernández-Varea JM; Tomal A
Phys Med Biol; 2021 May; 66(11):. PubMed ID: 33857930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Glandular dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code and voxel phantom.
Tzamicha E; Yakoumakis E; Tsalafoutas IA; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 25900891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dedicated cone-beam breast CT: Data acquisition strategies based on projection angle-dependent normalized glandular dose coefficients.
Tseng HW; Karellas A; Vedantham S
Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1406-1417. PubMed ID: 36427332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of the homogeneous tissue mixture approximation in breast imaging dosimetry.
Sechopoulos I; Bliznakova K; Qin X; Fei B; Feng SS
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5050-9. PubMed ID: 22894430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dataset of patient-derived digital breast phantoms for in silico studies in breast computed tomography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography.
Sarno A; Mettivier G; di Franco F; Varallo A; Bliznakova K; Hernandez AM; Boone JM; Russo P
Med Phys; 2021 May; 48(5):2682-2693. PubMed ID: 33683711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast dosimetry using high-resolution voxel phantoms.
Dance DR; Hunt RA; Bakic PR; Maidment AD; Sandborg M; Ullman G; Alm Carlsson G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):359-63. PubMed ID: 15933137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of the glandular breast dose for a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
Rodrigues L; Magalhaes LA; Braz D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 25480841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype.
Sechopoulos I; Feng SS; D'Orsi CJ
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4110-20. PubMed ID: 20879571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast dose in mammography is about 30% lower when realistic heterogeneous glandular distributions are considered.
Hernandez AM; Seibert JA; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6337-48. PubMed ID: 26520725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: patient radiation dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code.
Yakoumakis E; Tzamicha E; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):369-72. PubMed ID: 25836682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. INDIVIDUALISED CALCULATION OF TISSUE IMPARTED ENERGY IN BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS.
Geeraert N; Klausz R; Muller S; Bloch I; Bosmans H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):267-73. PubMed ID: 27127209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
