These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3814729)

  • 1. The kappa coefficient of agreement for multiple observers when the number of subjects is small.
    Gross ST
    Biometrics; 1986 Dec; 42(4):883-93. PubMed ID: 3814729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing the homogeneity of kappa statistics.
    Donner A; Eliasziw M; Klar N
    Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):176-83. PubMed ID: 8934591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interobserver agreement: Cohen's kappa coefficient does not necessarily reflect the percentage of patients with congruent classifications.
    Steinijans VW; Diletti E; Bömches B; Greis C; Solleder P
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1997 Mar; 35(3):93-5. PubMed ID: 9088995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An implicit enumeration method for an exact test of weighted kappa.
    Brusco MJ; Stahl S; Steinley D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):439-52. PubMed ID: 17650363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The a(d) coefficient as a descriptive measure of the within-group agreement of ratings.
    Kreuzpointner L; Simon P; Theis FJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):341-60. PubMed ID: 20298645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inter-rater agreement in judging errors in diagnostic reasoning.
    Hasnain M; Onishi H; Elstein AS
    Med Educ; 2004 Jun; 38(6):609-16. PubMed ID: 15189257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effective number of subjects and number of raters for inter-rater reliability studies.
    Saito Y; Sozu T; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
    Stat Med; 2006 May; 25(9):1547-60. PubMed ID: 16143966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of interrater agreement with adjustment for covariates.
    Barlow W
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):695-702. PubMed ID: 10766505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement.
    Gwet KL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):29-48. PubMed ID: 18482474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extension of the kappa coefficient.
    Kraemer HC
    Biometrics; 1980 Jun; 36(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 7190852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The comparison of clinical imaging devices with respect to parallel readings in both devices.
    Krummenauer F
    Eur J Med Res; 2006 Mar; 11(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 16751112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of the concordance correlation coefficient when examining agreement in dyadic research.
    Quinn C; Haber MJ; Pan Y
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 19752677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interval estimation under two study designs for kappa with binary classifications.
    Hale CA; Fleiss JL
    Biometrics; 1993 Jun; 49(2):523-34. PubMed ID: 8369386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A modified large-sample approach to approximate interval estimation for a particular intraclass correlation coefficient.
    Cappelleri JC; Ting N
    Stat Med; 2003 Jun; 22(11):1861-77. PubMed ID: 12754721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modelling patterns of agreement for nominal scales.
    Roberts C
    Stat Med; 2008 Mar; 27(6):810-30. PubMed ID: 17634968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Measurement of agreement between 2 judges. Qualitative cases].
    Fermanian J
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1984; 32(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 6484261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Assessment of clinical assessment reliability among researchers of a multicenter clinical trial].
    Baca-García E; Díaz-Sastre C; Rico F; Sáiz Ruiz J
    Actas Luso Esp Neurol Psiquiatr Cienc Afines; 1998; 26(6):358-62. PubMed ID: 9972587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning how to differ: agreement and reliability statistics in psychiatry.
    Streiner DL
    Can J Psychiatry; 1995 Mar; 40(2):60-6. PubMed ID: 7788619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Asymptotic distributions of kappa statistics and their differences with many raters, many rating categories and two conditions.
    Grassano L; Pagana G; Daperno M; Bibbona E; Gasparini M
    Biom J; 2018 Jan; 60(1):146-154. PubMed ID: 29110316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new approach for interval estimation and hypothesis testing of a certain intraclass correlation coefficient: the generalized variable method.
    Tian L; Cappelleri JC
    Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(13):2125-35. PubMed ID: 15211607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.