These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Bayesian adaptive biased-coin designs for clinical trials with normal responses. Atkinson AC; Biswas A Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 15737084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Testing for pairwise independence. Haber M Biometrics; 1986 Jun; 42(2):429-35. PubMed ID: 3741981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Problems with controlled clinical trials. On the way toward a different model]. Hansen EH; Launsø L Ugeskr Laeger; 1987 Oct; 149(41):2811-4. PubMed ID: 3451530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Factorial designs for randomized clinical trials. Byar DP; Piantadosi S Cancer Treat Rep; 1985 Oct; 69(10):1055-63. PubMed ID: 4042085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. How order affects the sign test. Rayner JC; Best DJ Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1416-21. PubMed ID: 9453784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Change-over clinical trial with binary data: mixed-model-based comparison of tests. Fidler V Biometrics; 1984 Dec; 40(4):1063-70. PubMed ID: 6534409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimal Bayesian design for patient selection in a clinical study. Buzoianu M; Kadane JB Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):953-61. PubMed ID: 19021600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A mixed-effects model for categorical data. Beitler PJ; Landis JR Biometrics; 1985 Dec; 41(4):991-1000. PubMed ID: 3830263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental design in clinical drug research: some practical implications. Lucchelli PE Int Z Klin Pharmakol Ther Toxikol; 1969 Jan; 2(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 4307963 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Further results on a multiple-testing procedure for clinical trials. Seigel D; Milton RC Biometrics; 1983 Dec; 39(4):921-8. PubMed ID: 6671127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meta-analysis of published data using a linear mixed-effects model. Stram DO Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):536-44. PubMed ID: 8672702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of two methods for adaptive interim analyses in clinical trials. Wassmer G Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):696-705. PubMed ID: 9629649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of misclassification models in the evaluation of caries clinical trials. Reed GF J Dent Res; 1984 May; 63 Spec No():727-30. PubMed ID: 6586776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment allocation for nonlinear models in clinical trials: the logistic model. Begg CB; Kalish LA Biometrics; 1984 Jun; 40(2):409-20. PubMed ID: 6487725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Bayesian analysis of the two-period crossover design for clinical trials. Grieve AP Biometrics; 1985 Dec; 41(4):979-90. PubMed ID: 3830262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]