144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38148063)
1. A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of Diagon/Gel
Hachenberg J; Gundermann J; Fritsch H; Malter W; Steinkassserer L; Hillemanns P; Eichler C
In Vivo; 2024; 38(1):380-384. PubMed ID: 38148063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The micropolyurethane foam-coated Diagon/Gel(®)4Two implant in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery - 3-year results of an ongoing study.
Brunnert KE
GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW; 2015; 4():Doc20. PubMed ID: 26713264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery.
Brown MH; Shenker R; Silver SA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Sep; 116(3):768-79; discussion 780-1. PubMed ID: 16141814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors Associated With Complications in Immediate Breast Reconstruction in 1 Stage With Completely Submuscular Implants.
Yazar S; Altinkaya A; Bengur FB; Karadag EC; Kara H; Uras C
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Sep; 83(3):264-270. PubMed ID: 30694848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of demographic and perioperative risk factors on complication rates in skin-sparing/nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant-based reconstruction using titanized polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP® Bra).
Michno V; Malter W; Paepke S; Thill M; Kelling K; Meiré A; Tofall S; Nolte E; Christ H; Eichler C
Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 40():101675. PubMed ID: 34871867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maximizing the use of precapsular space and the choice of implant type in breast augmentation mammaplasty revisions: review of 49 consecutive procedures and patient satisfaction assessment.
Castello MF; Lazzeri D; Silvestri A; Agostini T; Pascone C; Marcelli C; Gigliotti D; D'Aniello C; Gasparotti M
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):828-38. PubMed ID: 21455821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative Octenidine Application in Breast Reconstruction Surgery.
Hachenberg J; Acis E; Auer-Schmidt MM; Warm M; Malter W; Thangarajah F; Eichler C
In Vivo; 2021; 35(1):549-554. PubMed ID: 33402508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction with or without implants: A comparison between outcome and patient satisfaction.
Leuzzi S; Stivala A; Shaff JB; Maroccia A; Rausky J; Revol M; Bertrand B; Cristofari S
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Mar; 72(3):381-393. PubMed ID: 30639156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Direct to implant breast reconstruction by using SERI, preliminary report.
De Vita R; Buccheri EM; Pozzi M; Zoccali G
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2014 Nov; 33(1):78. PubMed ID: 25422034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nipple reconstruction after implant-based breast reconstruction: a "matched-pair" outcome analysis focusing on the effects of radiotherapy.
Momeni A; Ghaly M; Gupta D; Gurtner G; Kahn DM; Karanas YL; Lee GK
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1202-5. PubMed ID: 23664573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skin-Reducing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction With Submuscular-Dermal-Mesh Pocket.
Bonomi S; Sala L; Gennaro M; Ricci C; Cortinovis U
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jan; 82(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 30247191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conservative mastectomies.
Nava MB; Catanuto G; Pennati A; Garganese G; Spano A
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Sep; 33(5):681-6. PubMed ID: 19588190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. One-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction With Polyurethane-Coated Device: Standardized Assessment of Outcomes.
Catanuto G; Virzì D; Latino M; Musmeci N; Fichera D; Balafa K; Cannata I; Rocco N; Marino M; Castiglione G; Caruso F
Aesthet Surg J; 2024 Apr; 44(5):491-498. PubMed ID: 37738139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Local safety of immediate reconstruction during primary treatment of breast cancer. Direct-to-implant versus expander-based surgery.
Riggio E; Toffoli E; Tartaglione C; Marano G; Biganzoli E
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Feb; 72(2):232-242. PubMed ID: 30497914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: Higher complication rate vs cosmetic benefits.
Gschwantler-Kaulich D; Leser C; Salama M; Singer CF
Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):957-964. PubMed ID: 30230119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Immediate breast reconstruction using biodimensional anatomical permanent expander implants: a prospective analysis of outcome and patient satisfaction.
Gui GP; Tan SM; Faliakou EC; Choy C; A'Hern R; Ward A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Jan; 111(1):125-38; discussion 139-40. PubMed ID: 12496573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Breast reconstruction by inflatable anatomical implant. Retrospective study of 65 cases].
Rimareix F; Masson J; Couturaud B; Revol M; Servant JM
Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 1999 Jun; 44(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 10427831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Allergan, Mentor, and Sientra Contoured Cohesive Gel Breast Implants: A Single Surgeon's 10-Year Experience.
Doren EL; Pierpont YN; Shivers SC; Berger LH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Nov; 136(5):957-966. PubMed ID: 26505700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-Term Outcomes in Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
Alcon A; Rosser M; Gedallovich J; Foster RD; Sbitany H; Piper ML
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Aug; 152(2):273-280. PubMed ID: 36723619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty: treatment by skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction.
Carlson GW; Moore B; Thornton JF; Elliott M; Bolitho G
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2001 Mar; 107(3):687-92. PubMed ID: 11304592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
