These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38148601)
1. A Comparative Analysis of Marginal Adaptation Values between Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramics and Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Endocrowns: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies. Alwadai GS; Al Moaleem MM; Daghrery AA; Albar NH; Daghriri AA; AlGhamdi MM; Ageel SE; Daghreeri FAA; Al-Amri TMA; Aridhi WH; Almnea RA; Alhendi KD Med Sci Monit; 2023 Dec; 29():e942649. PubMed ID: 38148601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical behavior of all-ceramic endocrowns fabricated using CAD/CAM: A systematic review. AlHelal AA J Prosthodont Res; 2024 Jan; 68(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 37286503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal gap distance and cyclic fatigue loading for different all-ceramic endocrowns. Elsayed SM; Emam ZN; Abu-Nawareg M; Zidan AZ; Elsisi HA; Abuelroos EM; Fansa HA; Shokier HMR; Elbanna KA Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Feb; 27(3):879-887. PubMed ID: 36808333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of the Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Different CAD/CAM Materials. Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e504-e509. PubMed ID: 29508488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal adaptation and fracture strength of endocrowns manufactured with different restorative materials: SEM and mechanical evaluation. Sağlam G; Cengiz S; Karacaer Ö Microsc Res Tech; 2021 Feb; 84(2):284-290. PubMed ID: 32915479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Comparative Study of the Marginal Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated From Three Different Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) Ceramic Materials: An In Vitro Study. Attar E; Alshali S; Abuhaimed T Cureus; 2023 Jun; 15(6):e40081. PubMed ID: 37292110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of endocrown restorations utilizing different machinable blocks subjected to thermomechanical aging. Taha D; Spintzyk S; Sabet A; Wahsh M; Salah T J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 Jul; 30(4):319-328. PubMed ID: 30113129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of different CAD-CAM materials on the marginal and internal adaptation of endocrown restorations: An in vitro study. El Ghoul WA; Özcan M; Ounsi H; Tohme H; Salameh Z J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):128-134. PubMed ID: 31027958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Artificial Aging on Translucency of Zirconia Reinforced Lithium Silicate and Lithium Disilicate Ceramics: A Systematic Review. Potdukhe S; Iyer J; More A Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2024 May; 32(2):153-161. PubMed ID: 38299373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit of a CAD/CAM Monolithic Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Porcelain Laminate Veneer System. Baig MR; Akbar AA; Sabti MY; Behbehani Z J Prosthodont; 2022 Jul; 31(6):502-511. PubMed ID: 34608712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative analysis of endocrown fracture resistance and marginal adaptation: CAD/CAM technology using lithium disilicate vs. zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramics. Jalalian E; Zarbakhsh A; Khorshidi S; Golalipour S; Mohammadnasl S; Sayyari M Saudi Dent J; 2024 Feb; 36(2):353-358. PubMed ID: 38420004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of clinical efficacy of CAD CAM Endocrowns made of feldspathic ceramic, zirconia lithium silicate, and lithium disilicate: A two-year mixed cohort study. Jalali S; Asgari N; Pirooz P; Younespour S; Atri F J Dent; 2024 Oct; 149():105019. PubMed ID: 38670333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Glass-Ceramics Versus Bilayered Zirconia-Based Restorations. Hamza TA; Sherif RM J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e259-e264. PubMed ID: 29044828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate and zirconia all-ceramic CAD-CAM crowns using digital impressions: A systematic review. Turkyilmaz I; Benli M; Yun S Prim Dent J; 2023 Mar; 12(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 36916623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture resistance and failure modes of endocrowns manufactured with different CAD/CAM materials under axial and lateral loading. El Ghoul W; Özcan M; Silwadi M; Salameh Z J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 Jul; 31(4):378-387. PubMed ID: 31067007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative Evaluation of the Internal and Marginal Adaptations of CAD/CAM Endocrowns and Crowns Fabricated from Three Different Materials. Hasanzade M; Sahebi M; Zarrati S; Payaminia L; Alikhasi M Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(3):341–347. PubMed ID: 31856266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Riccitiello F; Amato M; Leone R; Spagnuolo G; Sorrentino R Open Dent J; 2018; 12():160-172. PubMed ID: 29854014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Color Stability of CAD/CAM Ceramics Prepared with Different Surface Finishing Procedures. Kanat-Ertürk B J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):166-172. PubMed ID: 30638286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of core material, veneering porcelain, and fabrication technique on the biaxial flexural strength and weibull analysis of selected dental ceramics. Lin WS; Ercoli C; Feng C; Morton D J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):353-62. PubMed ID: 22462639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optical behaviors, surface treatment, adhesion, and clinical indications of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS): A narrative review. Sorrentino R; Ruggiero G; Di Mauro MI; Breschi L; Leuci S; Zarone F J Dent; 2021 Sep; 112():103722. PubMed ID: 34118284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]