133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38149973)
1. Contrasting the form and strength of pre- and postcopulatory sexual selection in a flatworm.
Marie-Orleach L; Hall MD; Schärer L
Evolution; 2024 Feb; 78(3):511-525. PubMed ID: 38149973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantifying episodes of sexual selection: Insights from a transparent worm with fluorescent sperm.
Marie-Orleach L; Janicke T; Vizoso DB; David P; Schärer L
Evolution; 2016 Feb; 70(2):314-28. PubMed ID: 26787006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The repeatable opportunity for selection differs between pre- and postcopulatory fitness components.
Marie-Orleach L; Vellnow N; Schärer L
Evol Lett; 2021 Feb; 5(1):101-114. PubMed ID: 33552539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fluorescent sperm in a transparent worm: validation of a GFP marker to study sexual selection.
Marie-Orleach L; Janicke T; Vizoso DB; Eichmann M; Schärer L
BMC Evol Biol; 2014 Jun; 14():148. PubMed ID: 24980980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measuring Pre- and Post-Copulatory Sexual Selection and Their Interaction in Socially Monogamous Species with Extra-Pair Paternity.
Cramer ERA
Cells; 2021 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 33799610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Postcopulatory sexual selection is associated with reduced variation in sperm morphology.
Calhim S; Immler S; Birkhead TR
PLoS One; 2007 May; 2(5):e413. PubMed ID: 17476335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimentally evolved and phenotypically plastic responses to enforced monogamy in a hermaphroditic flatworm.
Janicke T; Sandner P; Ramm SA; Vizoso DB; Schärer L
J Evol Biol; 2016 Sep; 29(9):1713-27. PubMed ID: 27237934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mating behavior and the evolution of sperm design.
Schärer L; Littlewood DT; Waeschenbach A; Yoshida W; Vizoso DB
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Jan; 108(4):1490-5. PubMed ID: 21220334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sexual selection drives the coevolution of male and female reproductive traits in Peromyscus mice.
Weber WD; Fisher HS
J Evol Biol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 36480400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sperm competition and the coevolution of pre- and postcopulatory traits: Weapons evolve faster than testes among onthophagine dung beetles.
Simmons LW; Fitzpatrick JL
Evolution; 2016 May; 70(5):998-1008. PubMed ID: 27061413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mating behavior and reproductive morphology predict macroevolution of sex allocation in hermaphroditic flatworms.
Brand JN; Harmon LJ; Schärer L
BMC Biol; 2022 Feb; 20(1):35. PubMed ID: 35130880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Copulatory and Postcopulatory Sexual Selection in Primates.
Dixson AF
Folia Primatol (Basel); 2018; 89(3-4):258-286. PubMed ID: 29804108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. RNA-Seq of three free-living flatworm species suggests rapid evolution of reproduction-related genes.
Brand JN; Wiberg RAW; Pjeta R; Bertemes P; Beisel C; Ladurner P; Schärer L
BMC Genomics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):462. PubMed ID: 32631219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Positive genetic covariance between male sexual ornamentation and fertilizing capacity.
Polak M; Hurtado-Gonzales JL; Benoit JB; Hooker KJ; Tyler F
Curr Biol; 2021 Apr; 31(7):1547-1554.e5. PubMed ID: 33567290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High opportunity for postcopulatory sexual selection under field conditions.
Turnell BR; Shaw KL
Evolution; 2015 Aug; 69(8):2094-104. PubMed ID: 26179824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
Fedina TY; Lewis SM
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experimental evolution of sperm quality via postcopulatory sexual selection in house mice.
Firman RC; Simmons LW
Evolution; 2010 May; 64(5):1245-56. PubMed ID: 19922447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sperm performance in conspecific and heterospecific female fluid.
Cramer ER; Stensrud E; Marthinsen G; Hogner S; Johannessen LE; Laskemoen T; Eybert MC; Slagsvold T; Lifjeld JT; Johnsen A
Ecol Evol; 2016 Mar; 6(5):1363-77. PubMed ID: 26855769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Indirect genetic effects and sexual conflicts: Partner genotype influences multiple morphological and behavioral reproductive traits in a flatworm.
Marie-Orleach L; Vogt-Burri N; Mouginot P; Schlatter A; Vizoso DB; Bailey NW; Schärer L
Evolution; 2017 May; 71(5):1232-1245. PubMed ID: 28252800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Postcopulatory sexual selection generates speciation phenotypes in Drosophila.
Manier MK; Lüpold S; Belote JM; Starmer WT; Berben KS; Ala-Honkola O; Collins WF; Pitnick S
Curr Biol; 2013 Oct; 23(19):1853-62. PubMed ID: 24076241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
