These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3815011)

  • 1. Patient doses and risks from diagnostic radiology in North-east Italy.
    Padovani R; Contento G; Fabretto M; Malisan MR; Barbina V; Gozzi G
    Br J Radiol; 1987 Feb; 60(710):155-65. PubMed ID: 3815011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Calculation of the estimated collective effective dose equivalent (SE) due to x-ray diagnostic examinations--estimate of the SE in Finland.
    Rannikko S; Servomaa A; Ermakov I; Masarskii L; Saltukova L; Razumnaya M; Nikitin V
    Health Phys; 1987 Jul; 53(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 3597096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The average collective equivalent dose and fatal cancer risk for radiation workers in Radiology Department at Phramongkutklao Hospital, 2004-2008.
    Saengruang-Orn S; Mongkolsuk M; Rangsiphat T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 May; 95 Suppl 5():S96-102. PubMed ID: 22934453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Collective irradiation caused by radio-diagnostic procedures in France in 1982. Results (2)].
    Maccia C; Lefaure C; Fagnani F; Benedittini M
    J Radiol; 1986 Nov; 67(11):807-14. PubMed ID: 3806467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Somatic effects in nuclear medicine and radiology.
    Overbeek FJ; Pauwels EK; Bloem JL; Camps JA; Geleijns J; Broerse JJ
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1999 Jan; 50(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 10028628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Collective effective dose from diagnostic radiology in Ukraine.
    Stadnyk L; Shalopa O; Nosyk O
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):146-9. PubMed ID: 25848100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scientific view of low-level radiation risks.
    Hall EJ
    Radiographics; 1991 May; 11(3):509-18. PubMed ID: 1852943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Determination of the genetically significant dose from x-ray diagnosis in the Province of Varese (author's transl)].
    Mombelli L; Conte L; Inversini G; Pedroli G; Trussoni G; Visconti M
    Radiol Med; 1978 Feb; 64(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 684257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimated collective effective dose to the population from X-ray and nuclear medicine examinations in Finland.
    Bly R; Järvinen H; Korpela MH; Tenkanen-Rautakoski P; Mäkinen A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):233-6. PubMed ID: 21816721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of annual whole-body occupational radiation exposure in medical practice in Ghana (2000-09).
    Hasford F; Owusu-Banahene J; Amoako JK; Otoo F; Darko EO; Emi-Reynolds G; Yeboah J; Arwui CC; Adu S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 May; 149(4):431-7. PubMed ID: 21743072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical exposure to radiation and thyroid cancer.
    Schonfeld SJ; Lee C; Berrington de González A
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2011 May; 23(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 21296564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation protection recommendations as applied to the disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Ann ICRP; 1998; 28(4):i-vii, 1-25. PubMed ID: 10860107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effective dose and risks from medical X-ray procedures.
    Balonov MI; Shrimpton PC
    Ann ICRP; 2012; 41(3-4):129-41. PubMed ID: 23089012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Organ doses, detriment and genetic risk from interventional vascular procedures in Málaga (Spain).
    Ruiz-Cruces R; Perez-Martinez M; Tort Ausina I; Muñoz V; Martinez-Morillo M; Diez de los Ríos A
    Eur J Radiol; 2000 Jan; 33(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 10674785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Doses to patients from routine diagnostic X-ray examinations in England.
    Shrimpton PC; Wall BF; Jones DG; Fisher ES; Hillier MC; Kendall GM; Harrison RM
    Br J Radiol; 1986 Aug; 59(704):749-58. PubMed ID: 3730774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning.
    Christner JA; Kofler JM; McCollough CH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):881-9. PubMed ID: 20308486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Doses to patients from diagnostic radiology in France.
    Maccia C; Benedittini M; Lefaure C; Fagnani F
    Health Phys; 1988 Apr; 54(4):397-408. PubMed ID: 3350660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Calculation of effective dose.
    McCollough CH; Schueler BA
    Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):828-37. PubMed ID: 10841384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biokinetic and dosimetric modelling in the estimation of radiation risks from internal emitters.
    Harrison J
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Jun; 29(2A):A81-A105. PubMed ID: 19454809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequency and collective dose of medical procedures in Kenya.
    Korir GK; Wambani JS; Korir IK; Tries M; Kidali MM
    Health Phys; 2013 Dec; 105(6):522-33. PubMed ID: 24162056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.