These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3815011)

  • 41. Principles of the International Commission on Radiological Protection system of dose limitation.
    Thorne MC
    Br J Radiol; 1987 Jan; 60(709):32-8. PubMed ID: 3814995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Interventional radiology at a single institution over 9 years: a comprehensive evaluation of procedures and an estimation of collective effective dose.
    Peruzzo Cornetto A; Pasquino M; Aimonetto S; Zenone F; Catuzzo P; Natrella M; Cristoferi M; Fanelli G; Tofani S; Meloni T
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2012 Dec; 23(12):1665-1675.e2. PubMed ID: 23177114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A survey of the benefits and risks in the practice of radiology.
    Payne JT; Loken MK
    CRC Crit Rev Clin Radiol Nucl Med; 1975 Jul; 6(3):425-39. PubMed ID: 1097189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Collective doses and risks from dental radiology in Great Britain.
    Wall BF; Kendall GM
    Br J Radiol; 1983 Aug; 56(668):511-6. PubMed ID: 6871602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Patient dose and associated risk due to radiological investigation of the internal auditory meatus.
    Tweed JJ; Davies ML; Faulkner K; Rawlings DJ; Forster E
    Br J Radiol; 1991 May; 64(761):447-51. PubMed ID: 2036570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Reducing patient exposure to ionizing radiation--is it really necessary?
    Thomas RH; Busick DD
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1976 Nov; 37(11):657-64. PubMed ID: 1033663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. How dangerous are diagnostic X-rays?
    Russell JG
    Clin Radiol; 1984 Sep; 35(5):347-51. PubMed ID: 6467820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Organ doses, detriment and genetic risk from simple X-ray examinations in Málaga (Spain).
    Pérez Martínez M; Ruiz Cruces R; Martínez Morillo M; Díez de los Ríos Delgado A
    Eur J Radiol; 1997 Jul; 25(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 9248801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A review of radiation hazards with special reference to diagnostic radiology.
    Ang AH
    Med J Malaysia; 1973 Dec; 28(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 4276302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Triple-rule-out computed tomography angiography with 256-slice computed tomography scanners: patient-specific assessment of radiation burden and associated cancer risk.
    Perisinakis K; Seimenis I; Tzedakis A; Papadakis AE; Damilakis J
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Feb; 47(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 21857528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Monitoring of the medical radiological exposures of the population of the Emilia-Romagna Region.
    Compagnone G; Angelini P; Pagan L
    Radiol Med; 2006 Apr; 111(3):469-80. PubMed ID: 16683092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Estimation of the collective dose in the Portuguese population due to medical procedures in 2010.
    Teles P; Carmen de Sousa M; Paulo G; Santos J; Pascoal A; Cardoso G; Lança I; Matela N; Janeiro L; Sousa P; Carvoeiras P; Parafita R; Santos AI; Simãozinho P; Vaz P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 May; 154(4):446-58. PubMed ID: 23045717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Quantifying the risks of radiation exposure.
    Wasserman HJ
    S Afr Med J; 1986 Sep; 70(6):333-6. PubMed ID: 3750138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Russian practical guidance on radiological support for justification of X-ray and nuclear medicine examinations.
    Balonov M; Golikov V; Kalnitsky S; Zvonova I; Chipiga L; Sarycheva S; Shatskiy I; Vodovatov A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):39-42. PubMed ID: 25862538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effective radiation dose to the patient and to the general population from nuclear medicine procedures: variations in the last twenty-year period.
    Garancini S; Bianchi L; Conte L; Monciardini M; Roncari G
    Q J Nucl Med; 1995 Jun; 39(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 8574811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Radiation and your patient: a guide for medical practitioners.
    Ann ICRP; 2001; 31(4):5-31. PubMed ID: 12685757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Risk and benefit in paediatric radiology.
    Roebuck DJ
    Pediatr Radiol; 1999 Aug; 29(8):637-40. PubMed ID: 10415195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The National Radiation Monitoring Service. Report of the Special Survey of Radiological Departments in Ireland to determine the annual number of radiological examinations performed, the gonad dose delivered by each type of examination and the genetically significant radiation dose contributed to the population by diagnostic radiology.
    Powell MA; Cross F; Egan LJ; McCarthy MD; O'Connor JE; O'Sullivan D
    Ir J Med Sci; 1970 Feb; 3(2):85-101. PubMed ID: 5527620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Diagnostic radiology in Norway trends in examination frequency and collective effective dose.
    Børretzen I; Lysdahl KB; Olerud HM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 124(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 17526908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Radiation exposure and pregnancy: when should we be concerned?
    McCollough CH; Schueler BA; Atwell TD; Braun NN; Regner DM; Brown DL; LeRoy AJ
    Radiographics; 2007; 27(4):909-17; discussion 917-8. PubMed ID: 17620458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.