177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38150247)
1. A Video-Based Procedure-Specific Competency Assessment Tool for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
Ketel MHM; Klarenbeek BR; Eddahchouri Y; Cheong E; Cuesta MA; van Daele E; Ferri LE; Gisbertz SS; Gutschow CA; Hubka M; Hölscher AH; Law S; Luyer MDP; Merritt RE; Morse CR; Mueller CL; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Nilsson M; Pattyn P; Shen Y; van den Wildenberg FJH; Abma IL; Rosman C; van Workum F
JAMA Surg; 2024 Mar; 159(3):297-305. PubMed ID: 38150247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Crowd-sourced and expert video assessment in minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Ketel MHM; Klarenbeek BR; Eddahchouri Y; Cuesta MA; van Daele E; Gutschow CA; Hölscher AH; Hubka M; Luyer MDP; Merritt RE; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Shen Y; Abma IL; Rosman C; van Workum F
Surg Endosc; 2023 Oct; 37(10):7819-7828. PubMed ID: 37605010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nationwide Association of Surgical Performance of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy With Patient Outcomes.
Ketel MHM; Klarenbeek BR; Abma I; Belgers EHJ; Coene PLO; Dekker JWT; van Duijvendijk P; Emous M; Gisbertz SS; Haveman JW; Heisterkamp J; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Ruurda JP; van Sandick JW; van der Sluis PC; van Det MJ; van Esser S; Law S; de Steur WO; Sosef MN; Wijnhoven B; Hannink G; Rosman C; van Workum F;
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Apr; 7(4):e246556. PubMed ID: 38639938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. FA01.01: MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH RESULTS IN BETTER OUTCOME COMPARED TO OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY-A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED ANALYSIS.
Kwan Kit Chan D; Siu Yin Chan F; King Hung Tong D; Yu Hong Wong I; Lai Yin Wong C; Ting Law T; Ying Kit Law S
Dis Esophagus; 2018 Sep; 31(13):1. PubMed ID: 30219909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally Invasive Versus open AbdominoThoracic Esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma (MIVATE) - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial DRKS00016773.
Nickel F; Probst P; Studier-Fischer A; Nienhüser H; Pauly J; Kowalewski KF; Weiterer S; Knebel P; Diener MK; Weigand MA; Büchler MW; Schmidt T; Müller-Stich BP
Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):41. PubMed ID: 33430937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study.
Morimoto Y; Kawakubo H; Ishikawa A; Matsuda S; Hijikata N; Ando M; Mayanagi S; Irino T; Nakamura R; Wada N; Tsuji T; Kitagawa Y
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Apr; 15(2):270-278. PubMed ID: 34637190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy is safe and feasible for treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Ma S; Yan T; Liu D; Wang K; Wang J; Song J; Wang T; He W; Bai J; Jin L; Chen X
Thorac Cancer; 2018 Feb; 9(2):310-315. PubMed ID: 29319236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intrathoracic vs Cervical Anastomosis After Totally or Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
van Workum F; Verstegen MHP; Klarenbeek BR; Bouwense SAW; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Daams F; Gisbertz SS; Hannink G; Haveman JW; Heisterkamp J; Jansen W; Kouwenhoven EA; van Lanschot JJB; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; van der Peet DL; Polat F; Ubels S; Wijnhoven BPL; Rovers MM; Rosman C;
JAMA Surg; 2021 Jul; 156(7):601-610. PubMed ID: 33978698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT-2 trial).
Tagkalos E; van der Sluis PC; Berlth F; Poplawski A; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Müller-Stich BP; Ruurda JP; Schiesser M; Schneider PM; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
BMC Cancer; 2021 Sep; 21(1):1060. PubMed ID: 34565343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of comorbidity on outcomes and overall survival after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.
Dolan JP; Kaur T; Diggs BS; Luna RA; Schipper PH; Tieu BH; Sheppard BC; Hunter JG
Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4094-103. PubMed ID: 23846365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Survival and quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-surgeon experience.
Sundaram A; Geronimo JC; Willer BL; Hoshino M; Torgersen Z; Juhasz A; Lee TH; Mittal SK
Surg Endosc; 2012 Jan; 26(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 21853394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Salvage minimally invasive esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer can improve postoperative complications compared with salvage open esophagectomy.
Ishiyama K; Oguma J; Kubo K; Kanematsu K; Kurita D; Daiko H
Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3504-3510. PubMed ID: 34642795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modified McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a 5-year retrospective study of 142 patients in a single institution.
Chen B; Zhang B; Zhu C; Ye Z; Wang C; Ma D; Ye M; Kong M; Jin J; Lin J; Wu C; Wang Z; Ye J; Zhang J; Hu Q
PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e82428. PubMed ID: 24376537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors influencing quality of lymphadenectomy in minimally invasive esophagectomy: a US-based analysis.
Odetoyinbo K; Bachman K; Worrell S; Gray K; Linden P; Towe C
Dis Esophagus; 2022 Oct; 35(10):. PubMed ID: 35039833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Population-Based Cohort Study from a Prospective National Registry: Better Long-Term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Compared with Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy.
Hayami M; Ndegwa N; Lindblad M; Linder G; Hedberg J; Edholm D; Johansson J; Lagergren J; Lundell L; Nilsson M; Rouvelas I
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):5609-5621. PubMed ID: 35752726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anastomosis in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy via two ports provides equivalent perioperative outcomes to open.
Zhao Y; Jiao W; Zhao J; Wang X; Luo Y; Wang Y
Indian J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51 Suppl 2():e25-8. PubMed ID: 25712837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective comparison of totally minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Noble F; Kelly JJ; Bailey IS; Byrne JP; Underwood TJ;
Dis Esophagus; 2013 Apr; 26(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 23551569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).
Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
