These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38150804)

  • 1. Comprehensive performance evaluation of six bioaerosol samplers based on an aerosol wind tunnel.
    Guo J; Lv M; Liu Z; Qin T; Qiu H; Zhang L; Lu J; Hu L; Yang W; Zhou D
    Environ Int; 2024 Jan; 183():108402. PubMed ID: 38150804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A wind tunnel test of newly developed personal bioaerosol samplers.
    Su WC; Tolchinsky AD; Sigaev VI; Cheng YS
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Jul; 62(7):828-37. PubMed ID: 22866584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of physical sampling efficiency for cyclone-based personal bioaerosol samplers in moving air environments.
    Su WC; Tolchinsky AD; Chen BT; Sigaev VI; Cheng YS
    J Environ Monit; 2012 Sep; 14(9):2430-7. PubMed ID: 22833144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of IOM personal sampler at different flow rates.
    Zhou Y; Cheng YS
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Feb; 7(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 19953412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An experimental method for efficiently evaluating the size-resolved sampling efficiency of liquid-absorption aerosol samplers.
    Guo J; Zheng X; Qin T; Lv M; Zhang W; Song X; Qiu H; Hu L; Zhang L; Zhou D; Sun Y; Yang W
    Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):4745. PubMed ID: 35304534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of six inhalable aerosol samplers.
    Li SN; Lundgren DA; Rovell-Rixx D
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(4):506-16. PubMed ID: 10976680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laboratory study of selected personal inhalable aerosol samplers.
    Görner P; Simon X; Wrobel R; Kauffer E; Witschger O
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Mar; 54(2):165-87. PubMed ID: 20147627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.
    Mbareche H; Veillette M; Bilodeau GJ; Duchaine C
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 84(23):. PubMed ID: 30217848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Field testing of a personal size-selective bioaerosol sampler.
    Kenny LC; Bowry A; Crook B; Stancliffe JD
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Aug; 43(6):393-404. PubMed ID: 10518465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of eight bioaerosol samplers challenged with aerosols of free bacteria.
    Jensen PA; Todd WF; Davis GN; Scarpino PV
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 Oct; 53(10):660-7. PubMed ID: 1456208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Field evaluation of personal sampling methods for multiple bioaerosols.
    Wang CH; Chen BT; Han BC; Liu AC; Hung PC; Chen CY; Chao HJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0120308. PubMed ID: 25799419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving the UNC Passive Aerosol Sampler Model Based on Comparison with Commonly Used Aerosol Sampling Methods.
    Shirdel M; Andersson BM; Bergdahl IA; Sommar JN; Wingfors H; Liljelind IE
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2018 Mar; 62(3):328-338. PubMed ID: 29300818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sampling efficiency and nucleic acid stability during long-term sampling with different bioaerosol samplers.
    Bøifot KO; Skogan G; Dybwad M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2024 May; 196(6):577. PubMed ID: 38795190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments.
    An HR; Mainelis G; Yao M
    Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):385-93. PubMed ID: 15500631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sampling Efficiency and Performance of Selected Thoracic Aerosol Samplers.
    Görner P; Simon X; Boivin A; Bau S
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Aug; 61(7):784-796. PubMed ID: 28810686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the sampling efficiencies of a range of atmosphere samplers when collecting polymeric diphenylmethane di-isocyanate (MDI) aerosols.
    Hext PM; Booth K; Dharmarajan V; Karoly WJ; Parekh PP; Spence M
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 May; 18(5):346-57. PubMed ID: 12746078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The adaptation of existing personal inhalable aerosol samplers for bioaerosol sampling.
    Kenny LC; Stancliffe JD; Crook B; Stagg S; Griffiths WD; Stewart IW; Futter SJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Dec; 59(12):831-41. PubMed ID: 9866164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a 25-mm disposable sampler relative to the inhalable aerosol convention.
    Borsh FB; Sleeth DK; Handy RG; Pahler LF; Andrews R; Ashley K
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2019 Sep; 16(9):634-642. PubMed ID: 31298629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sampling of high amounts of bioaerosols using a high-volume electrostatic field sampler.
    Madsen AM; Sharma AK
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Apr; 52(3):167-76. PubMed ID: 18326871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.