These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38152153)

  • 1. Is It Possible for Light-Based Hair Removal Home Devices to Induce Ocular Damage? Systematic Review.
    Al Muqarrab FJ; Alsuwaidan S; Al Muqarrab Z; Alajlan A
    Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol; 2023; 16():3731-3742. PubMed ID: 38152153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Light-based home-use devices for hair removal: Why do they work and how effective they are?
    Town G; Botchkareva NV; Uzunbajakava NE; Nuijs T; van Vlimmeren M; Ash C; Dierickx C
    Lasers Surg Med; 2019 Aug; 51(6):481-490. PubMed ID: 30681170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A systematic review of light-based home-use devices for hair removal and considerations on human safety.
    Thaysen-Petersen D; Bjerring P; Dierickx C; Nash JF; Town G; Haedersdal M
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2012 May; 26(5):545-53. PubMed ID: 22126235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are home-use intense pulsed light (IPL) devices safe?
    Town G; Ash C
    Lasers Med Sci; 2010 Nov; 25(6):773-80. PubMed ID: 20625788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adverse Events of Light-Assisted Hair Removal: An Updated Review.
    Mallat F; Chaaya C; Aoun M; Soutou B; Helou J
    J Cutan Med Surg; 2023; 27(4):375-387. PubMed ID: 37272371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of the optical radiation hazard from a home-use intense pulsed light (IPL) source.
    Eadie E; Miller P; Goodman T; Moseley H
    Lasers Surg Med; 2009 Sep; 41(7):534-9. PubMed ID: 19639624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of adverse events for a home-use intense pulsed light hair removal device using postmarketing surveillance.
    Hattersley AM; Kiernan M; Goldberg D; Dierickx C; Sliney DH; Haedersdal M; Nash JF
    Lasers Surg Med; 2023 Apr; 55(4):414-422. PubMed ID: 36883997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guidelines on the safety of light-based home-use hair removal devices from the European Society for Laser Dermatology.
    Town G; Ash C; Dierickx C; Fritz K; Bjerring P; Haedersdal M
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2012 Jul; 26(7):799-811. PubMed ID: 22211702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A review of hand-held, home-use cosmetic laser and light devices.
    Hession MT; Markova A; Graber EM
    Dermatol Surg; 2015 Mar; 41(3):307-20. PubMed ID: 25705949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laser hair removal: a review.
    Gan SD; Graber EM
    Dermatol Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):823-38. PubMed ID: 23332016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ocular damage secondary to intense pulse light therapy to the face.
    Lee WW; Murdock J; Albini TA; O'brien TP; Levine ML
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011; 27(4):263-5. PubMed ID: 21346668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lasers for reduction of unwanted hair in skin of colour: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dorgham NA; Dorgham DA
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2020 May; 34(5):948-955. PubMed ID: 31587390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement of home-use laser and intense pulsed light systems for hair removal: preliminary report.
    Town G; Ash C
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2009 Sep; 11(3):157-68. PubMed ID: 19626523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unintentional macular injury following high-energy cosmetic laser calibration.
    Jbara D; Tiuseco K; Azar D
    Lasers Surg Med; 2023 Feb; 55(2):159-163. PubMed ID: 36640421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intense pulsed light (IPL): a review.
    Babilas P; Schreml S; Szeimies RM; Landthaler M
    Lasers Surg Med; 2010 Feb; 42(2):93-104. PubMed ID: 20166155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the effect of diode laser versus intense pulsed light in axillary hair removal.
    Ormiga P; Ishida CE; Boechat A; Ramos-E-Silva M
    Dermatol Surg; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1061-9. PubMed ID: 25229781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating the effectiveness of laser hair reduction using a home use laser in comparison to a Diode laser.
    Hendricks K; Nxumalo CT; Makgobole MU; Ghuman S; Jacobs D; Mpofana N
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0286162. PubMed ID: 37235570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative study on a single treatment response to long pulse Nd:YAG lasers and intense pulse light therapy for hair removal on skin type IV to VI--is longer wavelengths lasers preferred over shorter wavelengths lights for assisted hair removal.
    Goh CL
    J Dermatolog Treat; 2003 Dec; 14(4):243-7. PubMed ID: 14660273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dose-response of human follicles during laser-based hair removal: Ex vivo photoepilation model with classification system embracing morphological and histological features.
    van Vlimmeren MAA; Raafs B; Westgate G; Beijens LGM; Uzunbajakava NE
    Lasers Surg Med; 2019 Oct; 51(8):735-741. PubMed ID: 30889289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Current and future trends in home laser devices.
    Hodson DS
    Semin Cutan Med Surg; 2008 Dec; 27(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19150301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.