These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38152949)

  • 1. Effects of Contact Force on Lesion Size During Pulsed Field Catheter Ablation: Histochemical Characterization of Ventricular Lesion Boundaries.
    Nakagawa H; Castellvi Q; Neal R; Girouard S; Laughner J; Ikeda A; Sugawara M; An Y; Hussein AA; Nakhla S; Taigen T; Srounbek J; Kanj M; Santangeli P; Saliba WI; Ivorra A; Wazni OM
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2024 Jan; 17(1):e012026. PubMed ID: 38152949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Ablation Parameters to Predict Irreversible Lesion Size During Pulsed Field Ablation.
    Nakagawa H; Farshchi-Heydari S; Maffre J; Sharma T; Govari A; Beeckler CT; Altmann A; Ikeda A; Sugawara M; Jackman WM; Hussein AA; Nakhla S; Santangeli P; Saliba WI; Wazni OM
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2024 Aug; 17(8):e012814. PubMed ID: 39051118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vivo pulsed-field ablation in healthy vs. chronically infarcted ventricular myocardium: biophysical and histologic characterization.
    Sandhu U; Alkukhun L; Kheiri B; Hodovan J; Chiang K; Splanger T; Castellvi Q; Zhao Y; Nazer B
    Europace; 2023 Apr; 25(4):1503-1509. PubMed ID: 36793229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pulsed Field Ablation Index-Guided Ablation for Lesion Formation: Impact of Contact Force and Number of Applications in the Ventricular Model.
    Di Biase L; Marazzato J; Govari A; Altman A; Beeckler C; Keyes J; Sharma T; Grupposo V; Zou F; Sugawara M; Ikeda A; Raissi F; Bhardwaj R; Hsu JC; Lee M; Banker R; Mohanty S; Natale A; Chen Q; Parikh P; Zhang X; Nakagawa H
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2024 Apr; 17(4):e012717. PubMed ID: 38390748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between catheter contact force and radiofrequency lesion size and incidence of steam pop in the beating canine heart: electrogram amplitude, impedance, and electrode temperature are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force and lesion size.
    Ikeda A; Nakagawa H; Lambert H; Shah DC; Fonck E; Yulzari A; Sharma T; Pitha JV; Lazzara R; Jackman WM
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2014 Dec; 7(6):1174-80. PubMed ID: 25381331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of Electrode-Tissue Proximity on Cardiac Lesion Formation Using Pulsed Field Ablation.
    Howard B; Verma A; Tzou WS; Mattison L; Kos B; Miklavčič D; Onal B; Stewart MT; Sigg DC
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2022 Oct; 15(10):e011110. PubMed ID: 36166690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel contact force sensing pulsed field ablation catheter in a porcine model.
    Hua J; Xiong Q; Kong Q; Xiong L; Huang Q; Hu J; Li J; Hu J; Si P; Zhou T; Chen Q
    Clin Cardiol; 2024 Feb; 47(2):e24220. PubMed ID: 38402563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application repetition and electrode-tissue contact result in deeper lesions using a pulsed-field ablation circular variable loop catheter.
    Di Biase L; Marazzato J; Gomez T; Byun E; Zou F; Grupposo V; Mohanty S; La Fazia VM; Ammirati G; Lin A; Garcia DY; Della Rocca D; Al Ahamad A; Schiavone M; Gasperetti A; Freilich M; Serna JC; Forleo G; Liu X; Lakkireddy D; Tondo C; Natale A; Zhang XD
    Europace; 2024 Aug; 26(9):. PubMed ID: 39150065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation of Idiopathic LV Arrhythmias.
    Younis A; Tabaja C; Kleve R; Garrott K; Lehn L; Buck E; Hussein AA; Nakhla S; Nakagawa H; Krywanczyk A; Taigen T; Kanj M; Sroubek J; Saliba WI; Wazni OM; Santangeli P
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2024 Sep; 10(9):1998-2009. PubMed ID: 38878017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pulsed Field Ablation of the Porcine Ventricle Using a Focal Lattice-Tip Catheter.
    Kawamura I; Reddy VY; Wang BJ; Dukkipati SR; Chaudhry HW; Santos-Gallego CG; Koruth JS
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2022 Sep; 15(9):e011120. PubMed ID: 36074657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Point-by-Point Pulsed Field Ablation Using a Multimodality Generator and a Contact Force-Sensing Ablation Catheter: Comparison With Radiofrequency Ablation in a Remapped Chronic Swine Heart.
    Di Biase L; Marazzato J; Zou F; Lin A; Grupposo V; Chowdhuri N; Maffre J; Farshchi-Heydari S; Sharma T; Beeckler C; Govari A; Bhardwaj R; Mohanty S; Natale A; Nakagawa H; Zhang X
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2023 Dec; 16(12):663-671. PubMed ID: 37994554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pulsed Field Ablation of Left Ventricular Myocardium in a Swine Infarct Model.
    Im SI; Higuchi S; Lee A; Stillson C; Buck E; Morrow B; Schenider K; Speltz M; Gerstenfeld EP
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2022 Jun; 8(6):722-731. PubMed ID: 35738848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endocardial ventricular pulsed field ablation: a proof-of-concept preclinical evaluation.
    Koruth JS; Kuroki K; Iwasawa J; Viswanathan R; Brose R; Buck ED; Donskoy E; Dukkipati SR; Reddy VY
    Europace; 2020 Mar; 22(3):434-439. PubMed ID: 31876913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of Contact Force on Pulsed Field Ablation Outcomes Using Focal Point Catheter.
    Younis A; Santangeli P; Garrott K; Buck E; Tabaja C; Wass SY; Lehn L; Kleve R; Hussein AA; Nakhla S; Nakagawa H; Taigen T; Kanj M; Sroubek J; Saliba WI; Wazni OM
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2024 Jun; 17(6):e012723. PubMed ID: 38690671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Catheter-tissue contact optimizes pulsed electric field ablation with a large area focal catheter.
    Doshi SK; Flaherty MC; Laughner J; Quan M; Anic A
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2024 Apr; 35(4):765-774. PubMed ID: 38357859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of contact force on pulsed field ablation lesions in porcine cardiac tissue.
    Mattison L; Verma A; Tarakji KG; Reichlin T; Hindricks G; Sack KL; Önal B; Schmidt MM; Miklavčič D; Sigg DC
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2023 Mar; 34(3):693-699. PubMed ID: 36640426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamics of High-Density Unipolar Epicardial Electrograms During PFA.
    Amorós-Figueras G; Casabella-Ramon S; Moreno-Weidmann Z; Ivorra A; Guerra JM; García-Sánchez T
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2023 Sep; 16(9):e011914. PubMed ID: 37577822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of power and contact force on index-guided radiofrequency lesions in an ex vivo porcine heart model.
    Lozano Granero C; Franco E; Matía Francés R; Hernández-Madrid A; Sánchez-Pérez I; Zamorano Gómez JL; Moreno J
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2022 Apr; 63(3):687-697. PubMed ID: 34997886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of Pulsed Field vs Radiofrequency for the Reablation of Chronic Radiofrequency Ablation Substrate: Redo Pulsed Field Ablation.
    Younis A; Buck E; Santangeli P; Tabaja C; Garrott K; Lehn L; Hussein AA; Nakhla S; Nakagawa H; Yavin HD; Kanj M; Sroubek J; Saliba WI; Wazni OM
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2024 Feb; 10(2):222-234. PubMed ID: 37978965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of catheter-tissue contact force on lesion size during right ventricular outflow tract ablation in a swine model.
    Jiang JB; Li JY; Jiang ZY; Wang A; Huang Z; Xu HY; Shu CL; Li GJ; Zheng YS; He Y; Zhong GQ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2020 Jul; 133(14):1680-1687. PubMed ID: 32496308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.