117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38154632)
1. Screening and optimization of interpolation methods for mapping soil-borne polychlorinated biphenyls.
Liu A; Qu C; Zhang J; Sun W; Shi C; Lima A; De Vivo B; Huang H; Palmisano M; Guarino A; Qi S; Albanese S
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Feb; 913():169498. PubMed ID: 38154632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing ordinary kriging and inverse distance weighting for soil as pollution in Beijing.
Qiao P; Lei M; Yang S; Yang J; Guo G; Zhou X
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Jun; 25(16):15597-15608. PubMed ID: 29572743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of Ordinary Kriging and Inverse Distance Weighting Methods for Modeling Chromium and Cadmium Soil Pollution in E-Waste Sites in Douala, Cameroon.
Ouabo RE; Sangodoyin AY; Ogundiran MB
J Health Pollut; 2020 Jun; 10(26):200605. PubMed ID: 32509406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy Assessment of Kriging, artificial neural network, and a hybrid approach integrating spatial and terrain data in estimating and mapping of soil organic carbon.
Kılıç M; Gündoğan R; Günal H; Cemek B
PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268658. PubMed ID: 35617376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. GIS interpolation is key in assessing spatial and temporal bioremediation of groundwater arsenic contamination.
Fischer A; Lee MK; Ojeda AS; Rogers SR
J Environ Manage; 2021 Feb; 280():111683. PubMed ID: 33246756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the common spatial interpolation methods used to analyze potentially toxic elements surrounding mining regions.
Ding Q; Wang Y; Zhuang D
J Environ Manage; 2018 Apr; 212():23-31. PubMed ID: 29427938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of common spatial interpolation methods for analyzing pollutant spatial distributions at contaminated sites.
Qiao P; Li P; Cheng Y; Wei W; Yang S; Lei M; Chen T
Environ Geochem Health; 2019 Dec; 41(6):2709-2730. PubMed ID: 31144251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dataset characteristics influence the performance of different interpolation methods for soil salinity spatial mapping.
Fazeli Sangani M; Namdar Khojasteh D; Owens G
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Oct; 191(11):684. PubMed ID: 31659465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of four spatial interpolation methods for estimating soil moisture in a complex terrain catchment.
Yao X; Fu B; Lü Y; Sun F; Wang S; Liu M
PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e54660. PubMed ID: 23372749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving the mapping accuracy of soil heavy metals through an adaptive multi-fidelity interpolation method.
Ju L; Guo S; Ruan X; Wang Y
Environ Pollut; 2023 Aug; 330():121827. PubMed ID: 37187280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ingestion of GNSS-Derived ZTD and PWV for Spatial Interpolation of PM
Wei P; Xie S; Huang L; Liu L
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(15):. PubMed ID: 34360223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of predicting spatial contaminant distributions at industrial sites using partitioned interpolation method.
Qiao P; Yang S; Wei W; Li P; Cheng Y; Liang S; Lei M; Chen T
Environ Geochem Health; 2021 Jan; 43(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 32696201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of interpolation methods for the estimation of groundwater contamination in Andimeshk-Shush Plain, Southwest of Iran.
Mirzaei R; Sakizadeh M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Feb; 23(3):2758-69. PubMed ID: 26446732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ordinary kriging vs inverse distance weighting: spatial interpolation of the sessile community of Madagascar reef, Gulf of Mexico.
Zarco-Perello S; Simões N
PeerJ; 2017; 5():e4078. PubMed ID: 29204321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Spatial interpolation of soil organic matter using regression Kriging and geographically weighted regression Kriging].
Yang SH; Zhang HT; Guo L; Ren Y
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2015 Jun; 26(6):1649-56. PubMed ID: 26572015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel interpolation method to predict soil heavy metals based on a genetic algorithm and neural network model.
Yin G; Chen X; Zhu H; Chen Z; Su C; He Z; Qiu J; Wang T
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 825():153948. PubMed ID: 35219652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of four methods for spatial interpolation of estimated atmospheric nitrogen deposition in South China.
Qu L; Xiao H; Zheng N; Zhang Z; Xu Y
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Jan; 24(3):2578-2588. PubMed ID: 27826827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of various spatial interpolation methods for non-stationary regional soil mercury content].
Hu KL; Li BG; Lu YZ; Zhang FR
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2004 May; 25(3):132-7. PubMed ID: 15327270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison on the methods for spatial interpolation of the annual average precipitation in the Loess Plateau region].
Yu Y; Wei W; Chen LD; Yang L; Zhang HD
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2015 Apr; 26(4):999-1006. PubMed ID: 26259439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An Adaptive Weighting Algorithm for Interpolating the Soil Potassium Content.
Liu W; Du P; Zhao Z; Zhang L
Sci Rep; 2016 Apr; 6():23889. PubMed ID: 27051998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
