126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38155061)
1. Assessing the Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Mortality in Patients Who Underwent Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: 20 Years' Report from the EAU Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group.
Pellegrino F; Falagario UG; Knipper S; Martini A; Akre O; Egevad L; Aly M; Moschovas MC; Bravi CA; Tran J; Heiniger Y; von Kempis A; Schaffar R; Carrieri G; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Rochat CH; Mottrie A; Ahlering TE; John H; Patel V; Graefen M; Wiklund P;
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38155061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Defining Clinically Meaningful Positive Surgical Margins in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer.
Martini A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Scuderi S; Bravi CA; Mazzone E; Stabile A; Scarcella S; Robesti D; Barletta F; Cucchiara V; Mirone V; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Feb; 4(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 31411971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do margins matter? The influence of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer-specific mortality.
Stephenson AJ; Eggener SE; Hernandez AV; Klein EA; Kattan MW; Wood DP; Rabah DM; Eastham JA; Scardino PT
Eur Urol; 2014 Apr; 65(4):675-80. PubMed ID: 24035631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of preoperative risk on metastatic progression and cancer-specific mortality in patients with adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy.
Boehm K; Leyh-Bannurah SR; Rosenbaum C; Brandi LS; Budäus L; Graefen M; Huland H; Haferkamp A; Tilki D
BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120(5):666-672. PubMed ID: 28437038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
Sooriakumaran P; Ploumidis A; Nyberg T; Olsson M; Akre O; Haendler L; Egevad L; Nilsson A; Carlsson S; Jonsson M; Adding C; Hosseini A; Steineck G; Wiklund P
BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 24119144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy patients do not predict long-term oncological outcomes: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) cohort.
Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Cooperberg MR; Kane CJ; Amling C; Freedland SJ
BJU Int; 2016 Feb; 117(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 26010160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk of biochemical recurrence based on extent and location of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Marcq G; Michelet A; Hannink G; Rizk J; Sauvain J; Villers A; Saffarini M; Rochat CH
BMC Cancer; 2018 Dec; 18(1):1291. PubMed ID: 30587172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality.
Chalfin HJ; Dinizo M; Trock BJ; Feng Z; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Humphreys E; Han M
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1684-9. PubMed ID: 22788795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term oncological outcomes of apical positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital cohort.
Wadhwa H; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Cooperberg MR; Freedland SJ; Abern MR
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2016 Dec; 19(4):423-428. PubMed ID: 27698440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical margin status and its impact on prostate cancer prognosis after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis.
Zhang L; Wu B; Zha Z; Zhao H; Yuan J; Jiang Y; Yang W
World J Urol; 2018 Nov; 36(11):1803-1815. PubMed ID: 29766319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Positive Surgical Margins After Anterior Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Assessing the Learning Curve in a Multi-institutional Collaboration.
Bravi CA; Dell'Oglio P; Piazza P; Scarcella S; Bianchi L; Falagario U; Turri F; Andras I; Di Maida F; De Groote R; Piramide F; Moschovas MC; Suardi N; Terrone C; Carrieri G; Patel V; Autorino R; Porpiglia F; Vickers A; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Mottrie A; Larcher A;
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 38036328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy in High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients: Results from a Large Single-institution Series.
Dell'Oglio P; Tappero S; Longoni M; Buratto C; Scilipoti P; Secco S; Olivero A; Barbieri M; Palagonia E; Napoli G; Strada E; Petralia G; Di Trapani D; Vanzulli A; Bocciardi AM; Galfano A
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Apr; 38():69-78. PubMed ID: 35265866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A multinational, multi-institutional study comparing positive surgical margin rates among 22393 open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients.
Sooriakumaran P; Srivastava A; Shariat SF; Stricker PD; Ahlering T; Eden CG; Wiklund PN; Sanchez-Salas R; Mottrie A; Lee D; Neal DE; Ghavamian R; Nyirady P; Nilsson A; Carlsson S; Xylinas E; Loidl W; Seitz C; Schramek P; Roehrborn C; Cathelineau X; Skarecky D; Shaw G; Warren A; Delprado WJ; Haynes AM; Steyerberg E; Roobol MJ; Tewari AK
Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):450-6. PubMed ID: 24290695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Significant reduction in positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by application of the modified surgical margin recommendations of the 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus.
Maxeiner A; Magheli A; Jöhrens K; Kilic E; Braun TL; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Stephan C; Miller K; Busch J
BJU Int; 2016 Nov; 118(5):750-757. PubMed ID: 26915345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combined value of validated clinical and genomic risk stratification tools for predicting prostate cancer mortality in a high-risk prostatectomy cohort.
Cooperberg MR; Davicioni E; Crisan A; Jenkins RB; Ghadessi M; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):326-33. PubMed ID: 24998118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Close surgical margins after radical prostatectomy mimic biochemical recurrence rates of positive margins.
Whalen MJ; Shapiro EY; Rothberg MB; Turk AT; Woldu SL; Roy Choudhury A; Patel T; Badani KK
Urol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):494.e9-494.e14. PubMed ID: 26259665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostate Cancer-specific and All-cause Mortality After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: 20 Years' Report from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group.
Falagario UG; Knipper S; Pellegrino F; Martini A; Akre O; Egevad L; Grönberg H; Moschovas MC; Bravi CA; Tran J; Heiniger Y; von Kempis A; Schaffar R; Carrieri G; Rochat CH; Mottrie A; Ahlering TE; John H; Patel V; Graefen M; Wiklund P;
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37661459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
