136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38155443)
1. Grossing and reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens: An evidence-based approach.
Rao BV; Soni S; Kulkarni B; Bindhu MR; Ambekar A; Midha D; Kaushal S; Patil S; Jagdale R; Sundaram S; Kumar RM; Desai S; Menon S
Indian J Cancer; 2023 Oct; 60(4):449-457. PubMed ID: 38155443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer.
Vernooij RW; Lancee M; Cleves A; Dahm P; Bangma CH; Aben KK
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jun; 6(6):CD006590. PubMed ID: 32495338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate. Practice parameters, pathologic staging, and handling radical prostatectomy specimens.
Sakr WA; Grignon DJ
Urol Clin North Am; 1999 Aug; 26(3):453-63, v. PubMed ID: 10494284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Handling of radical prostatectomy specimens.
Egevad L
Histopathology; 2012 Jan; 60(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 22212081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of transrectal saturation biopsy in tumour localization: pathological correlation after retropubic radical prostatectomy and implication for focal ablative therapy.
Abdollah F; Scattoni V; Raber M; Roscigno M; Briganti A; Suardi N; Gallina A; Capitanio U; Freschi M; Salonia A; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2011 Aug; 108(3):366-71. PubMed ID: 21087451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Handling and pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens.
Montironi R; van der Kwast T; Boccon-Gibod L; Bono AV; Boccon-Gibod L
Eur Urol; 2003 Dec; 44(6):626-36. PubMed ID: 14644113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Uemura H; Hoshino K; Sasaki T; Miyoshi Y; Ishiguro H; Inayama Y; Kubota Y
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19076142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gleason scores of prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens over the past 10 years: is there evidence for systematic upgrading?
Smith EB; Frierson HF; Mills SE; Boyd JC; Theodorescu D
Cancer; 2002 Apr; 94(8):2282-7. PubMed ID: 12001128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason grade in academic and community settings.
Steinberg DM; Sauvageot J; Piantadosi S; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 1997 May; 21(5):566-76. PubMed ID: 9158682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pathological features of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3 MRI lesions in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Rahota RG; Diamand R; Malavaud B; Fiard G; Descotes JL; Peltier A; Beauval JB; Roumeguère T; Roumiguié M; Albisinni S; Ploussard G
BJU Int; 2022 May; 129(5):621-626. PubMed ID: 34358405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of prostate needle biopsy in predicting extracapsular tumor extension at radical retropubic prostatectomy: application in selecting patients for nerve-sparing surgery.
Sanwick JM; Dalkin BL; Nagle RB
Urology; 1998 Nov; 52(5):814-8; discussion 818-9. PubMed ID: 9801105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radical prostatectomy specimens among Medicare patients in New York State: a review of pathologists' reports.
Imperato PJ; Waisman J; Nenner RP
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Nov; 122(11):966-71. PubMed ID: 9822124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Concordance between three integrated scores based on prostate biopsy and grade-grouping of radical prostatectomy specimen].
Fu Y; Cai J; Chen Y; Zhou Q; Xu YM; Shi J; Fan XS
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Apr; 52(4):353-357. PubMed ID: 36973195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging-transectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients.
Baco E; Ukimura O; Rud E; Vlatkovic L; Svindland A; Aron M; Palmer S; Matsugasumi T; Marien A; Bernhard JC; Rewcastle JC; Eggesbø HB; Gill IS
Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):787-94. PubMed ID: 25240973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Analysis and prognostic factors of the specimen of radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer].
Fromont G; Molinié V; Soulié M; Salomon L
Prog Urol; 2015 Nov; 25(15):999-1009. PubMed ID: 26519964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Prostate cancer reporting: needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen].
Tóth E; Salamon F
Magy Onkol; 2019 Mar; 63(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 30889616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic significance of tumor volume in radical prostatectomy and needle biopsy specimens.
Epstein JI
J Urol; 2011 Sep; 186(3):790-7. PubMed ID: 21788055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transcriptome Wide Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy and Matching Surgical Specimens from High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: The Target Must Be Hit.
Radtke JP; Takhar M; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Erho N; du Plessis M; Buerki C; Ong K; Davicioni E; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Jul; 4(4):540-546. PubMed ID: 28753844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ex vivo MRI evaluation of prostate cancer: Localization and margin status prediction of prostate cancer in fresh radical prostatectomy specimens.
Heidkamp J; Hoogenboom M; Kovacs IE; Veltien A; Maat A; Sedelaar JPM; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Fütterer JJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 47(2):439-448. PubMed ID: 28580659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
