158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38156869)
21. Bright-field HER2 dual in situ hybridization (DISH) assay vs fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): focused study of immunohistochemical 2+ cases.
Gao FF; Dabbs DJ; Cooper KL; Bhargava R
Am J Clin Pathol; 2014 Jan; 141(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 24343743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Implementation of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 Guideline Recommendations in a tertiary care facility increases HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization concordance and decreases the number of inconclusive cases.
Middleton LP; Price KM; Puig P; Heydon LJ; Tarco E; Sneige N; Barr K; Deavers MT
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 May; 133(5):775-80. PubMed ID: 19415952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Limited human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 discordance in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab, a population based study.
van Rooijen JM; de Munck L; de Graaf JC; Siesling S; de Vries EG; Boers JE
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Mar; 50(5):885-91. PubMed ID: 24491395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Well-differentiated invasive breast cancers with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemistry: what is the yield of routine reflex in-situ hybridization testing?
Bethune GC; Pettit AS; Veldhuijzen van Zanten D; Barnes PJ
Histopathology; 2017 May; 70(6):966-974. PubMed ID: 28032917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Rate of reclassification of HER2-equivocal breast cancer cases to HER2-negative per the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines and response of HER2-equivocal cases to anti-HER2 therapy.
Crespo J; Sun H; Wu J; Ding QQ; Tang G; Robinson MK; Chen H; Sahin AA; Lim B
PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0241775. PubMed ID: 33180796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Impact of Partial Weak Staining in Normal Breast Epithelium on the Reliability of Immunohistochemistry Results in HercepTest-positive Breast Cancer.
Farra C; Fedda F; Tfayli A; Tawil A; Zaatari G; Ashkar H; Issa G; Boulos F
Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Oct; 19(5):340-344. PubMed ID: 31213407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. HER2 Equivocal (Score = 2+) Breast Carcinoma Cases Identified by Immunohistochemistry at a South African Hospital. What is the Impact of Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Testing?
Mohanlal RD; Bouwer N; Willem P
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2023 Sep; 31(8):555-560. PubMed ID: 37471623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations on HER2 interpretation in breast cancer.
Shah SS; Ketterling RP; Goetz MP; Ingle JN; Reynolds CA; Perez EA; Chen B
Hum Pathol; 2010 Jan; 41(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 19762065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization interpretation in invasive breast cancers with immunohistochemically equivocal results.
Wang B; Ding W; Sun K; Wang X; Xu L; Teng X
Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16726. PubMed ID: 31723206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Gene status in HER2 equivocal breast carcinomas: impact of distinct recommendations and contribution of a polymerase chain reaction-based method.
Sapino A; Maletta F; Verdun di Cantogno L; Macrì L; Botta C; Gugliotta P; Scalzo MS; Annaratone L; Balmativola D; Pietribiasi F; Bernardi P; Arisio R; Viberti L; Guzzetti S; Orlassino R; Ercolani C; Mottolese M; Viale G; Marchiò C
Oncologist; 2014 Nov; 19(11):1118-26. PubMed ID: 25323485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Development of an easy method to test for HER2 in breast cancer using dual-color in situ hybridization.
Nakagawa T; Horii R; Ito Y; Iwase T; Akiyama F
Breast Cancer; 2016 Jan; 23(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 24771412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Change in Pattern of HER2 Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Results in Breast Cancers Submitted for FISH Testing: Experience of a Reference Laboratory Using US Food and Drug Administration Criteria and American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Guidelines.
Shah MV; Wiktor AE; Meyer RG; Tenner KS; Ballman KV; Green SJ; Sukov WR; Ketterling RP; Perez EA; Jenkins RB
J Clin Oncol; 2016 Oct; 34(29):3502-3510. PubMed ID: 27458302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Her2/neu Status Determination in Breast Cancer: A Single Institutional Experience Using a Dual-Testing Approach With Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization.
Solomon JP; Dell'Aquila M; Fadare O; Hasteh F
Am J Clin Pathol; 2017 Apr; 147(4):432-437. PubMed ID: 28340220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The impact of 2018 ASCO-CAP HER2 testing guidelines on breast cancer HER2 results. An audit of 2132 consecutive cases evaluated by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization.
Farshid G; Dhatrak D; Gilhotra A; Koszyca B; Nolan J
Mod Pathol; 2020 Sep; 33(9):1783-1790. PubMed ID: 32366941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update.
Wolff AC; Hammond ME; Hicks DG; Dowsett M; McShane LM; Allison KH; Allred DC; Bartlett JM; Bilous M; Fitzgibbons P; Hanna W; Jenkins RB; Mangu PB; Paik S; Perez EA; Press MF; Spears PA; Vance GH; Viale G; Hayes DF; ;
J Clin Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(31):3997-4013. PubMed ID: 24101045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Chromogenic In Situ Hybridisation Test for Breast Cancer Patients with Equivocal IHC Results--a Study from Iran.
Mehrazma M; Kalantari E; Rezvani H; Bahar B; Basi A; Razavi SM; Rakhshani N
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(17):7695-700. PubMed ID: 26625783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impact of the updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) gene testing in invasive breast cancers: A single center study.
Lim TH; Lim AST; Tien SL; Tan PH
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2022 Jun; 58():151935. PubMed ID: 35313158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. HER2 testing in breast cancers: comparison of assays and interpretation using ASCO/CAP 2013 and 2018 guidelines.
McLemore LE; Albarracin CT; Gruschkus SK; Bassett RL; Wu Y; Dhamne S; Yim I; Lin K; Bedrosian I; Sneige N; Chen H
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 May; 187(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 33813685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Impact of the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 Guideline Updates on HER2 Assessment in Breast Cancer With Equivocal HER2 Immunohistochemistry Results With Focus on Cases With
Hoda RS; Brogi E; Xu J; Ventura K; Ross DS; Dang C; Robson M; Norton L; Morrow M; Wen HY
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2020 May; 144(5):597-601. PubMed ID: 31647316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer.
Wolff AC; Hammond ME; Schwartz JN; Hagerty KL; Allred DC; Cote RJ; Dowsett M; Fitzgibbons PL; Hanna WM; Langer A; McShane LM; Paik S; Pegram MD; Perez EA; Press MF; Rhodes A; Sturgeon C; Taube SE; Tubbs R; Vance GH; van de Vijver M; Wheeler TM; Hayes DF;
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2007; 131(1):18-43. PubMed ID: 19548375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
