These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38156918)

  • 1. Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) in colorectal liver metastasis: Efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors.
    Zhang H; Wu C; Chen M; Sun Y; Han J
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2023 Dec; 19(6):1525-1532. PubMed ID: 38156918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) exhibits superior efficacy and equal tolerance to conventional TACE in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with conventional TACE history.
    Tang J; Huang Z; Xu J; Lv Q; Wang P
    Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol; 2022 Mar; 46(3):101814. PubMed ID: 34597848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of CalliSpheres® microspheres versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of refractory colorectal cancer liver metastasis.
    Li H; Zhang X; Zhao W; Cai F; Qin J; Tian J
    BMC Cancer; 2023 Oct; 23(1):970. PubMed ID: 37828491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Treatment Response and Survival Profiles Between Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization and Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Chinese Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.
    Wen P; Chen SD; Wang JR; Zeng YH
    Oncol Res; 2019 May; 27(5):583-592. PubMed ID: 31053181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conventional versus drug-eluting beads chemoembolization for infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison of efficacy and safety.
    Zhang ZS; Li HZ; Ma C; Xiao YD
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Nov; 19(1):1162. PubMed ID: 31783814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of DEB-TACE and cTACE for the initial treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma beyond up-to-seven criteria: A single-center propensity score matching analysis.
    Shi Q; Liu J; Li T; Zhou C; Wang Y; Huang S; Yang C; Chen Y; Xiong B
    Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol; 2022 May; 46(5):101893. PubMed ID: 35247625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with arterioportal fistula.
    Cai L; Li H; Guo J; Zhao W; Duan Y; Hou X; Cheng L; Du H; Shao X; Diao Z; Hao Y; Zheng X; Li C; Li W
    Cancer Biol Ther; 2022 Dec; 23(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 35230928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads versus lipiodol transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a short-term efficacy and safety study.
    Wu B; Zhou J; Ling G; Zhu D; Long Q
    World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Mar; 16(1):69. PubMed ID: 29587773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Callispheres® drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization might be an efficient and safety down-staging therapy in unresectable liver cancer patients.
    Peng N; Mao L; Tao Y; Xiao K; Yuan G; He S
    World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Aug; 20(1):254. PubMed ID: 35941634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) vs conventional TACE in treating hepatocellular carcinoma patients with multiple conventional TACE treatments history: A comparison of efficacy and safety.
    Li H; Wu F; Duan M; Zhang G
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 May; 98(21):e15314. PubMed ID: 31124925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comprehensive predictive factors for CalliSpheres® microspheres (CSM) drug-eluting bead-transarterial chemoembolization and conventional transarterial chemoembolization on treatment response and survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.
    Chen C; Qiu H; Yao Y; Zhang Z; Ma C; Ma Y; Zhao C; Xiang H; Zhao H; Zheng C; Xiong B; Li H; Long Q; Zhou J; Luo C; Hu H
    Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol; 2021 Mar; 45(2):101460. PubMed ID: 32593695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of treatment response, survival and safety between drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres® microspheres versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization in treating hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Zhao C; Ma SPZCY
    J BUON; 2019; 24(3):1150-1166. PubMed ID: 31424674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of CalliSpheres
    Shi Z; Wang D; Kang T; Yi R; Cui L; Jiang H
    Radiol Oncol; 2023 Mar; 57(1):70-79. PubMed ID: 36794998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conventional transarterial chemoembolization versus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Kloeckner R; Weinmann A; Prinz F; Pinto dos Santos D; Ruckes C; Dueber C; Pitton MB
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Jun; 15():465. PubMed ID: 26059447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Imaging Changes and Clinical Complications After Drug-Eluting Bead Versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Multicenter Study.
    Zhang L; Sun JH; Ji JS; Zhong BY; Zhou GH; Song JJ; Hou ZH; Huang P; Zhang S; Li Z; Zhu XL; Ni CF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Oct; 217(4):933-943. PubMed ID: 33245680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of lipiodol infusion and drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma in a real-life setting.
    Karalli A; Teiler J; Haji M; Seth E; Brismar TB; Wahlin S; Axelsson R; Stål P
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 54(7):905-912. PubMed ID: 31287338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization for small hepatocellular carcinoma in Child-Pugh class A patients.
    Lee IJ; Lee JH; Lee YB; Kim YJ; Yoon JH; Yin YH; Lee M; Hur S; Kim HC; Jae HJ; Chung JW
    Ther Adv Med Oncol; 2019; 11():1758835919866072. PubMed ID: 31447948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of treatment efficacy and safety between drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres
    Ma Y; Zhao C; Zhao H; Li H; Chen C; Xiang H; Zheng C; Ma C; Luo C; Qiu H; Yao Y; Hu H; Xiong B; Zhou J; Zhu H; Long Q
    Am J Transl Res; 2019; 11(12):7456-7470. PubMed ID: 31934293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison between drug-eluting bead-transarterial chemoembolization and conventional transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials.
    Wang H; Cao C; Wei X; Shen K; Shu Y; Wan X; Sun J; Ren X; Dong Y; Liu Y; Zhai B
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2020; 16(2):243-249. PubMed ID: 32474508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Five-year outcome of conventional and drug-eluting transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Liu YS; Lin CY; Chuang MT; Lin CY; Tsai YS; Wang CK; Ou MC
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):124. PubMed ID: 30075752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.