These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38157974)

  • 1. Optical impressions assessment for overlay restorations with rubber dam: A clinical trial.
    Espona J; Roig E; Ali A; Vidal C; Garcia-Font M; Roig M; Figueras O
    J Dent; 2024 Apr; 143():104825. PubMed ID: 38157974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of rubber-dam on the reconstruction of proximal contacts with adhesive tooth-colored restorations.
    Dörfer CE; Schriever A; Heidemann D; Staehle HJ; Pioch T
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 11570685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital scanning under rubber dam: An innovative method for making definitive impressions in fixed prosthodontics.
    Henarejos-Domingo V; Clavijo V; Blasi Á; Madeira S; Roig M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Oct; 33(7):976-981. PubMed ID: 34008328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraoral Scanning with Rubber Dam Isolation in Place for Fabrication of a Chairside Computer-assisted Design and Computer-assisted Manufacture Ceramic Restoration.
    Jurado CA; Lederman R; Cohen J; Tsujimoto A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Aug; 22(8):943-946. PubMed ID: 34753849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of the isolation method on the 10-year clinical behaviour of posterior resin composite restorations.
    Raskin A; Setcos JC; Vreven J; Wilson NH
    Clin Oral Investig; 2000 Sep; 4(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11000319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of rubber dam versus cotton roll isolation on composite resin restorations' survival in primary molars: 2-year results from a non-inferiority clinical trial.
    Olegário IC; Moro BLP; Tedesco TK; Freitas RD; Pássaro AL; Garbim JR; Oliveira R; Mendes FM; ; Raggio DP
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Oct; 22(1):440. PubMed ID: 36217147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of cervical restorations on the periodontal tissues: 5-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Favetti M; Montagner AF; Fontes ST; Martins TM; Masotti AS; Jardim PDS; Corrêa FOB; Cenci MS; Muniz FWMG
    J Dent; 2021 Mar; 106():103571. PubMed ID: 33385534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does operatory field isolation influence the performance of direct adhesive restorations?
    Daudt E; Lopes GC; Vieira LC
    J Adhes Dent; 2013 Feb; 15(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 23534003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on minimally invasive occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a two-year randomised split-mouth study.
    Hatirli H; Yasa B; Çelik EU
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Sep; 25(9):5493-5503. PubMed ID: 33683465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mercury levels in plasma and urine after removal of all amalgam restorations: the effect of using rubber dams.
    Berglund A; Molin M
    Dent Mater; 1997 Sep; 13(5):297-304. PubMed ID: 9823089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rubber dam use during routine operative dentistry procedures: findings from the Dental PBRN.
    Gilbert GH; Litaker MS; Pihlstrom DJ; Amundson CW; Gordan VV;
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):491-9. PubMed ID: 20945739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two years survival rate of Class II ART restorations in primary molars using two ways to avoid saliva contamination.
    Carvalho TS; Sampaio FC; Diniz A; Bönecker M; Van Amerongen WE
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2010 Nov; 20(6):419-25. PubMed ID: 20642474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The digital impression under rubber dam: clinical insights for an accurate scan].
    Gerdolle D; Browett S; Gresnigt MMM
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2023 Feb; 130(2):73-79. PubMed ID: 36748679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.
    Borgia E; Baron R; Borgia JL
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e195-e203. PubMed ID: 28513897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attitudes and use of rubber dam by Irish general dental practitioners.
    Lynch CD; McConnell RJ
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jun; 40(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 17501755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short communication: Influence of different isolation methods on the survival of proximal ART restorations in primary molars after two years.
    Kemoli AM; van Amerongen WE; Opinya GN
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2010 Jun; 11(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 20507811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of the effects of cutting off, overlapping, and rescanning procedures on intraoral scanning accuracy.
    Revilla-León M; Sicilia E; Agustín-Panadero R; Gómez-Polo M; Kois JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):746-754. PubMed ID: 34998582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An In Vitro Comparison of the Marginal Adaptation Accuracy of CAD/CAM Restorations Using Different Impression Systems.
    Shembesh M; Ali A; Finkelman M; Weber HP; Zandparsa R
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):581-586. PubMed ID: 26855068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the marginal fit of single-unit, complete-coverage ceramic restorations fabricated after digital and conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tsirogiannis P; Reissmann DR; Heydecke G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):328-335.e2. PubMed ID: 27061627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rubber dam usage related to restoration quality and survival.
    Smales RJ
    Br Dent J; 1993 May; 174(9):330-3. PubMed ID: 8484999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.