These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38160083)

  • 1. China's regulatory change toward genome-edited crops.
    Yang F; Zheng K; Yao Y
    Trends Biotechnol; 2024 Jul; 42(7):801-806. PubMed ID: 38160083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CRISPR/Cas systems: opportunities and challenges for crop breeding.
    Biswas S; Zhang D; Shi J
    Plant Cell Rep; 2021 Jun; 40(6):979-998. PubMed ID: 33977326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genome editing of crops: A renewed opportunity for food security.
    Georges F; Ray H
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 28075688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regulatory aspects of gene editing in Argentina.
    Lema MA
    Transgenic Res; 2019 Aug; 28(Suppl 2):147-150. PubMed ID: 31321697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regulatory approaches for genome edited agricultural plants in select countries and jurisdictions around the world.
    Entine J; Felipe MSS; Groenewald JH; Kershen DL; Lema M; McHughen A; Nepomuceno AL; Ohsawa R; Ordonio RL; Parrott WA; Quemada H; Ramage C; Slamet-Loedin I; Smyth SJ; Wray-Cahen D
    Transgenic Res; 2021 Aug; 30(4):551-584. PubMed ID: 33970411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A future scenario of the global regulatory landscape regarding genome-edited crops.
    Ishii T; Araki M
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 27960622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Outlook on Global Regulatory Landscape for Genome-Edited Crops.
    Ahmad A; Munawar N; Khan Z; Qusmani AT; Khan SH; Jamil A; Ashraf S; Ghouri MZ; Aslam S; Mubarik MS; Munir A; Sultan Q; Abd-Elsalam KA; Qari SH
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Oct; 22(21):. PubMed ID: 34769204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of genome editing techniques to regulate gene expression in crops.
    Dong H
    BMC Plant Biol; 2024 Feb; 24(1):100. PubMed ID: 38331711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. European Court of Justice delivers no justice to Europe on genome-edited crops.
    Schulman AH; Oksman-Caldentey KM; Teeri TH
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2020 Jan; 18(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 31246337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consumer acceptance of food crops developed by genome editing.
    Ishii T; Araki M
    Plant Cell Rep; 2016 Jul; 35(7):1507-18. PubMed ID: 27038939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gene-Edited Crops: Towards a Harmonized Safety Assessment.
    Kleter GA; Kuiper HA; Kok EJ
    Trends Biotechnol; 2019 May; 37(5):443-447. PubMed ID: 30616999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Canadian regulatory aspects of gene editing technologies.
    Ellens KW; Levac D; Pearson C; Savoie A; Strand N; Louter J; Tibelius C
    Transgenic Res; 2019 Aug; 28(Suppl 2):165-168. PubMed ID: 31321700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A research program for the socioeconomic impacts of gene editing regulation.
    Whelan AI; Lema MA
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 28080208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Engineering plants using diverse CRISPR-associated proteins and deregulation of genome-edited crops.
    Zaman QU; Raza A; Lozano-Juste J; Chao L; Jones MGK; Wang HF; Varshney RK
    Trends Biotechnol; 2024 May; 42(5):560-574. PubMed ID: 37993299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Crop Gene-Editing: Should We Bypass or Apply Existing GMO Policy?
    Ishii T
    Trends Plant Sci; 2018 Nov; 23(11):947-950. PubMed ID: 30241735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. DNA-free genome editing methods for targeted crop improvement.
    Kanchiswamy CN
    Plant Cell Rep; 2016 Jul; 35(7):1469-74. PubMed ID: 27100964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Canadian regulatory perspectives on genome engineered crops.
    Smyth SJ
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 27858499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perspectives on the Application of Genome-Editing Technologies in Crop Breeding.
    Hua K; Zhang J; Botella JR; Ma C; Kong F; Liu B; Zhu JK
    Mol Plant; 2019 Aug; 12(8):1047-1059. PubMed ID: 31260812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetically modified crop regulations: scope and opportunity using the CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing approach.
    Gupta S; Kumar A; Patel R; Kumar V
    Mol Biol Rep; 2021 May; 48(5):4851-4863. PubMed ID: 34114124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regulatory hurdles for genome editing: process- vs. product-based approaches in different regulatory contexts.
    Sprink T; Eriksson D; Schiemann J; Hartung F
    Plant Cell Rep; 2016 Jul; 35(7):1493-506. PubMed ID: 27142995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.