These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38161076)

  • 1. Perception of color mismatch or conspicuous marginal adaptation in extraoral prostheses with eye-tracking.
    Özcivelek T; Basmacı F; Turgut B; Akbulut K; Kılıçarslan MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):332-339. PubMed ID: 38161076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perception of orbital epitheses evaluated with eye tracker.
    Basmacı F; Mersin TÖ; Turgut B; Akbulut K; Kılıçarslan MA
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Dec; 31(9):754-760. PubMed ID: 35909303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How We Look At Mature Faces-An Eye-Tracking Investigation Into the Perception of Age.
    Frank K; Ehrl D; Bernardini F; Walbrun A; Moellhoff N; Alfertshofer M; Davidovic K; Mardini S; Gotkin RH; Cotofana S
    Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Feb; 43(2):115-122. PubMed ID: 36099471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extraoral prostheses using extraoral implants.
    Pekkan G; Tuna SH; Oghan F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 40(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 21255978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptibility and acceptability thresholds of simulated facial skin color differences.
    Lagouvardos P; Spyropoulou N; Polyzois G
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Oct; 62(4):503-508. PubMed ID: 30121182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Survey of currently used materials for fabrication of extraoral maxillofacial prostheses in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia.
    Montgomery PC; Kiat-Amnuay S
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Aug; 19(6):482-90. PubMed ID: 20002975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How Old Do I Look? Exploring the Facial Cues of Age in a Tasked Eye-Tracking Study.
    Liao D; Ishii LE; Chen J; Chen LW; Kumar A; Papel ID; Kontis TC; Byrne PJ; Boahene KDO; Ishii M
    Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2020; 22(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 32053421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual and instrumental color evaluation of computerized color matching system for color reproduction of maxillofacial prostheses.
    Kurt M; Karakoca Nemli S; Bankoğlu Güngör M; Turhan Bal B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1121-1127. PubMed ID: 33663869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retrospective study of treatment outcomes with implant-retained extraoral prostheses: survival rates and prosthetic complications.
    Karakoca S; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bal BT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):118-26. PubMed ID: 20141816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retention systems used in maxillofacial prostheses: A review.
    Diken Türksayar AA; Saglam SA; Bulut AC
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1629-1634. PubMed ID: 31793467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A systematic review of the computerized tools and digital techniques applied to fabricate nasal, auricular, orbital and ocular prostheses for facial defect rehabilitation.
    Farook TH; Jamayet NB; Abdullah JY; Rajion ZA; Alam MK
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jun; 121(3):268-277. PubMed ID: 31610244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Application of negative molds technology based on three-dimensional printing in digital maxillofacial prostheses].
    Gu XY; Chen XB; Jiao T; Zhang FQ; Jiang XQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):336-341. PubMed ID: 28613053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How are faces with increased and decreased lower facial height perceived visually?
    Dindaroğlu F; Doğan S; Yalçın A; Türkan N; Yüvrük E
    Int J Comput Dent; 2017; 20(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 29292413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extraoral maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center: a survey of patient attitudes and opinions.
    Markt JC; Lemon JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):608-13. PubMed ID: 11404761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The complex facial prosthesis. The value of bone-anchored maxillofacial prostheses in the treatment of extensive loss of facial tissue].
    Palmer S; Brix M; Bénateau H
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2001 Aug; 102(5):261-5. PubMed ID: 11599147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Objectively Measuring Observer Attention in Severe Thyroid-Associated Orbitopathy: A 3D Study.
    Liao D; Ishii M; Darrach HM; Bater KL; Smith J; Joseph AW; Douglas RS; Joseph SS; Ishii LE
    Laryngoscope; 2019 May; 129(5):1250-1254. PubMed ID: 30151919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fabricating nasal prostheses using four-dimensional facial expression models.
    Yoshioka F; Ozawa S; Matsuoka A; Takebe J
    J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Aug; 65(3):379-386. PubMed ID: 33028799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intra- and extraoral prostheses using osseointegrated implants after maxillofacial surgery.
    Ueda M; Niimi A; Kaneda T
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1993; 3(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 10148565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct 3D printing of silicone facial prostheses: A preliminary experience in digital workflow.
    Unkovskiy A; Spintzyk S; Brom J; Huettig F; Keutel C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):303-308. PubMed ID: 29429837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation: A survey on the quality of life.
    Dings JPJ; Merkx MAW; de Clonie Maclennan-Naphausen MTP; van de Pol P; Maal TJJ; Meijer GJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):780-786. PubMed ID: 30414646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.