These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38162245)

  • 1.
    Prabakar J; Jeevanandan G; Kengadaran S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023; 16(5):745-750. PubMed ID: 38162245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative Evaluation of the Viscosity and Length of Resin Tags of Conventional and Hydrophilic Pit and Fissure Sealants on Permanent Molars: An
    Prabakar J; John J; Arumugham IM; Kumar RP; Sakthi DS
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2018; 9(3):388-394. PubMed ID: 30166832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An
    Singh R; Lakhanam M
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(3):304-310. PubMed ID: 35991789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage Assessment of Two Different Pit and Fissure Sealants: A Comparative Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Study.
    Prabakar J; Indiran MA; Kumar P; Dooraikannan S; Jeevanandan G
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(Suppl 1):S29-S33. PubMed ID: 34434011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative Evaluation of the Microleakage and Shear Bond Strength of Three Filled Pit and Fissure Sealants Using Subpressure and Adhesive System: An Experimental Analysis.
    Waghmode SK; Devendrappa SN; Hadakar SG; Gaonkar NN; Gugawad S; Taur S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023 Aug; 16(Suppl 1):S97-S100. PubMed ID: 37663217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of the length of resin tags, viscosity and microleakage of pit and fissure sealants - an in vitro scanning electron microscope study.
    Prabhakar AR; Murthy SA; Sugandhan S
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2011 Oct; 2(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 22346161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of different pit and fissure sealants.
    Babaji P; Vaid S; Deep S; Mishra S; Srivastava M; Manjooran T
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2016 Aug; 6(Suppl 2):S111-5. PubMed ID: 27652241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison and Evaluation of the Retention, Cariostatic Effect, and Discoloration of Conventional Clinpro 3M ESPE and Hydrophilic Ultraseal XT Hydro among 12-15-year-old Schoolchildren for a Period of 6 Months: A Single-blind Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Mohapatra S; Prabakar J; Indiran MA; Kumar RP; Sakthi DS
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(6):688-693. PubMed ID: 33976497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Microleakage and Penetration Depth between Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Sealants in Primary Second Molar.
    Gawali PN; Chaugule VB; Panse AM
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 9(4):291-295. PubMed ID: 28127158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In Vitro Evaluation of Different Protocols for Preventing Microleakage of Fissure Sealants Placed Following Saliva Contamination.
    Şimşek H; Yazıcı AR; Güngör HC
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020 Aug; 44(4):240-248. PubMed ID: 33167017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Microleakage of Different Types of Pit and Fissure Sealants: An
    Prabahar T; Chowdhary N; Konkappa KN; Vundela RR; Balamurugan S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(5):535-540. PubMed ID: 36865737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Embrace Wetbond
    Swathy RS; Naidu J
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023; 16(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 37020754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage, microgap, and shear bond strength of an infiltrant for pit and fissure sealing.
    Zhou Y; Huang X; Wu L; Liang Y; Huang Y; Huang S
    Heliyon; 2023 May; 9(5):e16248. PubMed ID: 37229157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative evaluation of Shear bond strength of different Pit and fissure Sealants in Primary and Permanent teeth - An In-Vitro Study.
    Pushpalatha HM; Ravichandra KS; Srikanth K; Divya G; Done V; Krishna KB; Patil V
    J Int Oral Health; 2014 Apr; 6(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 24876707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shear Bond Strength and Microleakage of a New Self-etching/Self-adhesive Pit and Fissure Sealant.
    Schuldt C; Birlbauer S; Pitchika V; Crispin A; Hickel R; Ilie N; Kühnisch J
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Dec; 17(6):491-7. PubMed ID: 26734672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In Vitro Microleakage Comparison of Flowable Nanocomposites and Conventional Materials Used in Pit and Fissure Sealant Therapy.
    Arastoo S; Behbudi A; Rakhshan V
    Front Dent; 2019; 16(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 31608333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of Marginal Microleakage and Depth of Penetration of Different Materials Used as Pit and Fissure Sealants: An
    Butail A; Dua P; Mangla R; Saini S; Chauhan A; Rana S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 32581477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improvement of Pit-and-Fissure Sealant Bonding to Enamel with Subpressure Treatment.
    Zhang C; Li Y; Zhang Z; Tian Y; Ding N; Ma Y
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():5070383. PubMed ID: 31032348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative Analysis of Techniques for Pit and Fissure Sealant Application to Reduce Microleakage.
    Patil P; Padmawar NS; Girdhar D; Singh S; Shah YD; Gupta S
    Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e54984. PubMed ID: 38550456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage and shear bond strength of a new sealant containing prereacted glass ionomer particles.
    Durham SN; Meyers EJ; Bailey CW; Vandewalle KS
    Gen Dent; 2017; 65(2):e12-e16. PubMed ID: 28253189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.