These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3816240)
1. Determinants of the enhancement of the right visual field advantage by bilateral vs. unilateral stimuli. Liederman J Cortex; 1986 Dec; 22(4):553-65. PubMed ID: 3816240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Independent functioning of the two cerebral hemispheres for recognizing bilaterally presented tachistoscopic visual-half-field stimuli. Hines D Cortex; 1975 Jun; 11(2):132-43. PubMed ID: 1149472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Information processing in the cerebral hemispheres: selective hemispheric activation and capacity limitations. Hellige JB; Cox PJ; Litvac L J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Jun; 108(2):251-79. PubMed ID: 528905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lateralization of spatial rather than temporal attention underlies the left hemifield advantage in rapid serial visual presentation. Asanowicz D; Kruse L; Ćmigasiewicz K; Verleger R Brain Cogn; 2017 Nov; 118():54-62. PubMed ID: 28797898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evidence for scanning with unilateral visual presentation of letters. Tramer O; Butler BE; Mewhort DJ Brain Lang; 1985 May; 25(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 4027561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Attentional bias and visual field asymmetry. Beaumont JG; Colley M Cortex; 1980 Oct; 16(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 7214924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vocal responses to left visual stimuli following forebrain commissurotomy. Johnson LE Neuropsychologia; 1984; 22(2):153-66. PubMed ID: 6728179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The neural basis of the right visual field advantage in reading: an MEG analysis using virtual electrodes. Barca L; Cornelissen P; Simpson M; Urooj U; Woods W; Ellis AW Brain Lang; 2011 Sep; 118(3):53-71. PubMed ID: 20932563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cerebral dominance and attentional bias in word recognition. Leventhal G Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Jun; 66(3):791-800. PubMed ID: 3405703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A left visual field advantage in perception of gaze direction. Ricciardelli P; Ro T; Driver J Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(7):769-77. PubMed ID: 11900727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Visual evoked response correlates of cerebral specialization after human commissurotomy. Gott PS; Rossiter VS; Galbraith GC; Saul RE Biol Psychol; 1977 Sep; 5(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 922081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Superior recall of letters in the right visual field with bilateral presentation and partial report. Rosen JJ; Curcio F; Mackavey W; Hebert J Cortex; 1975 Jun; 11(2):144-54. PubMed ID: 1149473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A systematic study of visual extinction. Between- and within-field deficits of attention in hemispatial neglect. Vuilleumier PO; Rafal RD Brain; 2000 Jun; 123 ( Pt 6)():1263-79. PubMed ID: 10825363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The previous visual field: effects of lateralization and response accuracy on current performance. Levy J; Wagner N; Luh K Neuropsychologia; 1990; 28(12):1239-49. PubMed ID: 2280832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hemispheric asymmetries for temporal information processing: transient detection versus sustained monitoring. Okubo M; Nicholls ME Brain Cogn; 2008 Mar; 66(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 17706333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative and qualitative hemispheric asymmetry for processing Japanese kana. Hellige JB; Yamauchi M Brain Cogn; 1999 Aug; 40(3):453-63. PubMed ID: 10415131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The contribution of attention to the right visual field advantage for word recognition. Nicholls ME; Wood AG Brain Cogn; 1998 Dec; 38(3):339-57. PubMed ID: 9841790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interhemispheric asymmetries in the visual evoked response: effects of stimulus lateralisation and task. Rugg MD; Beaumont JG Biol Psychol; 1978 Jun; 6(4):283-92. PubMed ID: 708813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hemispheric specialization for the processing of linguistic and non-linguistic stimuli in congenitally deaf and hearing adults: a review and contribution. Boshoven MM; McNeil MR; Harvey LO Audiology; 1982; 21(6):509-30. PubMed ID: 7181743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]