144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3816240)
1. Determinants of the enhancement of the right visual field advantage by bilateral vs. unilateral stimuli.
Liederman J
Cortex; 1986 Dec; 22(4):553-65. PubMed ID: 3816240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Independent functioning of the two cerebral hemispheres for recognizing bilaterally presented tachistoscopic visual-half-field stimuli.
Hines D
Cortex; 1975 Jun; 11(2):132-43. PubMed ID: 1149472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Information processing in the cerebral hemispheres: selective hemispheric activation and capacity limitations.
Hellige JB; Cox PJ; Litvac L
J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Jun; 108(2):251-79. PubMed ID: 528905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lateralization of spatial rather than temporal attention underlies the left hemifield advantage in rapid serial visual presentation.
Asanowicz D; Kruse L; Śmigasiewicz K; Verleger R
Brain Cogn; 2017 Nov; 118():54-62. PubMed ID: 28797898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evidence for scanning with unilateral visual presentation of letters.
Tramer O; Butler BE; Mewhort DJ
Brain Lang; 1985 May; 25(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 4027561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Attentional bias and visual field asymmetry.
Beaumont JG; Colley M
Cortex; 1980 Oct; 16(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 7214924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vocal responses to left visual stimuli following forebrain commissurotomy.
Johnson LE
Neuropsychologia; 1984; 22(2):153-66. PubMed ID: 6728179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The neural basis of the right visual field advantage in reading: an MEG analysis using virtual electrodes.
Barca L; Cornelissen P; Simpson M; Urooj U; Woods W; Ellis AW
Brain Lang; 2011 Sep; 118(3):53-71. PubMed ID: 20932563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bihemispheric processing of redundant bilateral lexical information.
Hasbrooke RE; Chiarello C
Neuropsychology; 1998 Jan; 12(1):78-94. PubMed ID: 9460737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cerebral dominance and attentional bias in word recognition.
Leventhal G
Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Jun; 66(3):791-800. PubMed ID: 3405703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A left visual field advantage in perception of gaze direction.
Ricciardelli P; Ro T; Driver J
Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(7):769-77. PubMed ID: 11900727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Visual evoked response correlates of cerebral specialization after human commissurotomy.
Gott PS; Rossiter VS; Galbraith GC; Saul RE
Biol Psychol; 1977 Sep; 5(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 922081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Superior recall of letters in the right visual field with bilateral presentation and partial report.
Rosen JJ; Curcio F; Mackavey W; Hebert J
Cortex; 1975 Jun; 11(2):144-54. PubMed ID: 1149473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A systematic study of visual extinction. Between- and within-field deficits of attention in hemispatial neglect.
Vuilleumier PO; Rafal RD
Brain; 2000 Jun; 123 ( Pt 6)():1263-79. PubMed ID: 10825363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The previous visual field: effects of lateralization and response accuracy on current performance.
Levy J; Wagner N; Luh K
Neuropsychologia; 1990; 28(12):1239-49. PubMed ID: 2280832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hemispheric asymmetries for temporal information processing: transient detection versus sustained monitoring.
Okubo M; Nicholls ME
Brain Cogn; 2008 Mar; 66(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 17706333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative and qualitative hemispheric asymmetry for processing Japanese kana.
Hellige JB; Yamauchi M
Brain Cogn; 1999 Aug; 40(3):453-63. PubMed ID: 10415131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The contribution of attention to the right visual field advantage for word recognition.
Nicholls ME; Wood AG
Brain Cogn; 1998 Dec; 38(3):339-57. PubMed ID: 9841790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interhemispheric asymmetries in the visual evoked response: effects of stimulus lateralisation and task.
Rugg MD; Beaumont JG
Biol Psychol; 1978 Jun; 6(4):283-92. PubMed ID: 708813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hemispheric specialization for the processing of linguistic and non-linguistic stimuli in congenitally deaf and hearing adults: a review and contribution.
Boshoven MM; McNeil MR; Harvey LO
Audiology; 1982; 21(6):509-30. PubMed ID: 7181743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
