BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3816240)

  • 21. The role of attention in visual bilateral matching tasks.
    Moes PE; Jeeves MA; Norman WD
    Cortex; 1996 Dec; 32(4):631-46. PubMed ID: 8954243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comments on the interpretation of lateral asymmetries in the naming of words and line drawings.
    Young AW; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 1983 Sep; 20(1):166-71. PubMed ID: 6626941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Interhemispheric interaction when both hemispheres have access to the same stimulus information.
    Hellige JB; Taylor AK; Eng TL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Nov; 15(4):711-22. PubMed ID: 2531206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hemisphere division and its effect on selective attention: a generality examination of Lavie's load theory.
    Nishimura R; Yoshizaki K; Kato K; Hatta T
    Int J Neurosci; 2009; 119(9):1429-45. PubMed ID: 19922366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A right hemispatial field advantage on a verbal free-vision task.
    Levy J; Kueck L
    Brain Lang; 1986 Jan; 27(1):24-37. PubMed ID: 3947942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of script direction on word processing modes in left and right visual fields.
    Siéroff E; Slama Y
    Laterality; 2018 Jul; 23(4):479-500. PubMed ID: 29141494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Words, hemispheres, and dissociable subsystems: the effects of exposure duration, case alternation, priming, and continuity of form on word recognition in the left and right visual fields.
    Ellis AW; Ansorge L; Lavidor M
    Brain Lang; 2007 Dec; 103(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 17292463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hemispheric differences in the rates of information processing for simple non-verbal stimuli.
    Nicholls ME; Cooper CJ
    Neuropsychologia; 1991; 29(7):677-84. PubMed ID: 1944869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perceptual interactions between bilaterally presented words: what you get is often not what you see.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychology; 2003 Oct; 17(4):566-77. PubMed ID: 14599270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The bilateral advantage for famous faces: interhemispheric communication or competition?
    Baird LM; Burton AM
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr; 46(5):1581-7. PubMed ID: 18281066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sex and visual field effects on accuracy and decision making when subjects classify male and female faces.
    Jones B
    Cortex; 1979 Dec; 15(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 548219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [A new test for hemisphericity: the examination of its validity and reliability].
    Ogura H; Hatta T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1983 Apr; 54(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 6674661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Visual laterality effects and cerebral speech dominance determined by the carotid Amytal test.
    Strauss E; Wada J; Kosaka B
    Neuropsychologia; 1985; 23(4):567-70. PubMed ID: 4033909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hemispheric processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations in the absence of low spatial frequencies.
    Okubo M; Michimata C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Feb; 14(2):291-7. PubMed ID: 11970792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Semantic category effects modulate visual priming in neglect patients.
    Viggiano MP; Marzi T; Forni M; Righi S; Franceschini R; Peru A
    Cortex; 2012 Oct; 48(9):1128-37. PubMed ID: 21757194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Tachistoscopic recognition of Kana and Hangul words, handedness and shift of laterality difference.
    Shimizu A; Endo M
    Neuropsychologia; 1981; 19(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 7312151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interhemispheric cooperation and non-cooperation during word recognition: evidence for callosal transfer dysfunction in dyslexic adults.
    Henderson L; Barca L; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2007 Dec; 103(3):276-91. PubMed ID: 17544495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hemisphere differences in the effects of cuing in visual recognition tasks.
    Cohen C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 Nov; 1(4):366-73. PubMed ID: 1185123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Word repetition within- and across-visual fields: an event-related potential study.
    Doyle MC; Rugg MD
    Neuropsychologia; 1998 Dec; 36(12):1403-15. PubMed ID: 9863694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Visual half-field testing of memory functions in patients considered for surgical treatment of intractable complex partial epilepsy.
    Christianson SA; Nilsson LG; Säisä J; Silfvenius H
    Acta Neurol Scand; 1992 Dec; 86(6):545-54. PubMed ID: 1481638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.