These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3816240)

  • 41. Hemispheric differences for visual matrix processing: stimulus size and spatial frequency effects.
    Pedersen HK; Polich J
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Dec; 47(3):525-38. PubMed ID: 11748906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Do concurrent verbal memory loads influence the verbal laterality pattern in the bilateral task?
    Duda PD
    Brain Lang; 1983 Sep; 20(1):65-78. PubMed ID: 6626946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Lateralization of visual perception of letters during reverse masking].
    Miamlin VV
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1985; 35(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 4024730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Orthographic neighborhood effects during lateralized lexical decision are abolished with bilateral presentation.
    Mills R; Woodhead ZVJ; Parker AJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 May; 48(5):481-496. PubMed ID: 35389711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Different methods of lexical access for words presented in the left and right visual hemifields.
    Young AW; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 1985 Mar; 24(2):326-58. PubMed ID: 3978409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Perceptual reference frames and visual field asymmetry for verbal processing.
    Hellige JB; Cowin EL; Eng T; Sergent V
    Neuropsychologia; 1991; 29(10):929-39. PubMed ID: 1762672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Hemispheric advantages and shifts of laterality differences in visual and tactual modalities.
    Streitfeld B
    Int J Neurosci; 1985 Jan; 25(3-4):245-54. PubMed ID: 3980157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Interhemispheric collaboration in response to simultaneous bilateral input.
    Liederman J; Merola J; Martinez S
    Neuropsychologia; 1985; 23(5):673-83. PubMed ID: 4058711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Individual differences in cerebral asymmetries for facial recognition.
    Ross P; Turkewitz G
    Cortex; 1981 Jul; 17(2):199-214. PubMed ID: 7285593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A right visual field advantage for tool-recognition in the visual half-field paradigm.
    Verma A; Brysbaert M
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2342-8. PubMed ID: 21527265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The roles of stimulus repetition and hemispheric activation in visual half-field asymmetries.
    Sullivan KF; McKeever WF
    Brain Cogn; 1985 Oct; 4(4):413-29. PubMed ID: 4084401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Hemisphere specialisation and inter-hemispheric cooperation during a phonological task: effect of lexicality as assessed by the divided visual field approach.
    Perrone-Bertolotti M; Lemonnier S; Bonniot C; Baciu M
    Laterality; 2013; 18(2):216-30. PubMed ID: 22489628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Processing from LVF, RVF and BILATERAL presentations: examinations of metacontrol and interhemispheric interaction.
    Hellige JB; Jonsson JE; Michimata C
    Brain Cogn; 1988 Feb; 7(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 3345268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Detection of cerebral lateralization of function using EEG alpha-contingent visual stimulation.
    Goodman DM; Beatty J; Mulholland TB
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Apr; 48(4):418-31. PubMed ID: 6153603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Hemispheric asymetry of the evoked electrical activity of the cerebral cortex to letter and non-verbal stimuli].
    Kostandov EA; Genkina OA
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1976; 26(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 1274440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Hemispheric differences in matching Stroop-type letter stimuli.
    Alivisatos B; Wilding J
    Cortex; 1982 Apr; 18(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 7187633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Asymmetries in the covert orienting of visual spatial attention to spatial and non-spatial cues in Alzheimer's disease.
    Maruff P; Malone V; Currie J
    Brain; 1995 Dec; 118 ( Pt 6)():1421-35. PubMed ID: 8595474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Lateral visual field stimulation reveals extrastriate cortical activation in the contralateral hemisphere: an fMRI study.
    Schiffer F; Mottaghy FM; Pandey Vimal RL; Renshaw PF; Cowan R; Pascual-Leone A; Teicher M; Valente E; Rohan M
    Psychiatry Res; 2004 May; 131(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15246450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Right visual field advantage for perceived contrast: correlation with an auditory bias and handedness.
    Railo H; Tallus J; Hämäläinen H
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Dec; 77(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 21962763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The impact of perceptual changes to studied items on ERP correlates of familiarity and recollection is subject to hemispheric asymmetries.
    Küper K; Zimmer HD
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Apr; 122():17-25. PubMed ID: 29396208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.