These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38165111)
1. Quantitative flow ratio for the prediction of coronary events after percutaneous coronary intervention. Kageyama S; O'Leary N; Chenniganahosahalli Revaiah P; Ninomiya K; Masuda S; Kotoku N; Ilancheran N; Garg S; Harte E; Ni Bheolain G; Reiber JHC; Tu S; Zaman A; Sabaté M; Möllmann H; Sharif F; Lemoine J; Wlodarczak A; Onuma Y; Serruys PW; Multivessel Talent Trial Investigators OBOT EuroIntervention; 2024 Jan; 20(1):104-106. PubMed ID: 38165111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation). Fearon WF; Nishi T; De Bruyne B; Boothroyd DB; Barbato E; Tonino P; Jüni P; Pijls NHJ; Hlatky MA; Circulation; 2018 Jan; 137(5):480-487. PubMed ID: 29097450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Virtual PCI Powered by Augmented Reality: Pave the Way to Optimal Revascularization. Xu B; Zhang R JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Apr; 16(7):795-797. PubMed ID: 36898942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. FAVOR III China: quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention in practice. Ang D; Berry C Cardiovasc Res; 2022 Aug; 118(11):e78-e80. PubMed ID: 36000975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-Analysis Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Fractional-Flow-Reserve- and Angiography-Guided Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Matthews CJ; Naylor K; Blaxill JM; Greenwood JP; Mozid AM; Rossington JA; Veerasamy M; Wheatcroft SB; Bulluck H Am J Cardiol; 2022 Dec; 184():160-162. PubMed ID: 36184352 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic Value of Measuring Fractional Flow Reserve After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Complex Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the FAME 3 Trial. Piroth Z; Otsuki H; Zimmermann FM; Ferenci T; Keulards DCJ; Yeung AC; Pijls NHJ; De Bruyne B; Fearon WF Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Nov; 15(11):884-891. PubMed ID: 36121706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimization of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Is There a Place for Physiology? Räber L; Biccirè FG JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Oct; 16(19):2409-2411. PubMed ID: 37821186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reply to: "Do we still need to perform FFR and PCI". van de Hoef TP; Boerhout CKM; Piek JJ Int J Cardiol; 2023 May; 378():22. PubMed ID: 36787867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Revascularization on Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow as Assessed by Serial [ Driessen RS; Danad I; Stuijfzand WJ; Schumacher SP; Knuuti J; Mäki M; Lammertsma AA; van Rossum AC; van Royen N; Raijmakers PG; Knaapen P Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 May; 11(5):e007417. PubMed ID: 29703779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated systematic review. Enezate T; Omran J; Al-Dadah AS; Alpert M; White CJ; Abu-Fadel M; Aronow H; Cohen M; Aguirre F; Patel M; Mahmud E Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jul; 92(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 28980386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. FFR-guided PCI versus CABG: Analysis of new data. Hassler KR; Schumer EM; Crestanello JA; Stulak JM; Ramakrishna H J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2022 Aug; 36(8 Pt B):3389-3391. PubMed ID: 35606292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]