These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38166269)

  • 1. Dynamic fit index cutoffs for categorical factor analysis with Likert-type, ordinal, or binary responses.
    McNeish D
    Am Psychol; 2023 Dec; 78(9):1061-1075. PubMed ID: 38166269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic fit index cutoffs for confirmatory factor analysis models.
    McNeish D; Wolf MG
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Feb; 28(1):61-88. PubMed ID: 34694832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic fit index cutoffs for one-factor models.
    McNeish D; Wolf MG
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Apr; 55(3):1157-1174. PubMed ID: 35585278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. dynamic : An R Package for Deriving Dynamic Fit Index Cutoffs for Factor Analysis.
    Wolf MG; McNeish D
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):189-194. PubMed ID: 36787513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generalizability of Dynamic Fit Index, Equivalence Testing, and Hu & Bentler Cutoffs for Evaluating Fit in Factor Analysis.
    McNeish D
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):195-219. PubMed ID: 36787523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Permutation randomization methods for testing measurement equivalence and detecting differential item functioning in multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis.
    Jorgensen TD; Kite BA; Chen PY; Short SD
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Dec; 23(4):708-728. PubMed ID: 29172611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Thorny Relation Between Measurement Quality and Fit Index Cutoffs in Latent Variable Models.
    McNeish D; An J; Hancock GR
    J Pers Assess; 2018; 100(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 28631976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Masking misfit in confirmatory factor analysis by increasing unique variances: a cautionary note on the usefulness of cutoff values of fit indices.
    Heene M; Hilbert S; Draxler C; Ziegler M; Bühner M
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Sep; 16(3):319-36. PubMed ID: 21843002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are fit indices used to test psychopathology structure biased? A simulation study.
    Greene AL; Eaton NR; Li K; Forbes MK; Krueger RF; Markon KE; Waldman ID; Cicero DC; Conway CC; Docherty AR; Fried EI; Ivanova MY; Jonas KG; Latzman RD; Patrick CJ; Reininghaus U; Tackett JL; Wright AGC; Kotov R
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2019 Oct; 128(7):740-764. PubMed ID: 31318246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why we need to abandon fixed cutoffs for goodness-of-fit indices: An extensive simulation and possible solutions.
    Groskurth K; Bluemke M; Lechner CM
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):3891-3914. PubMed ID: 37640961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Model Fit and Item Factor Analysis: Overfactoring, Underfactoring, and a Program to Guide Interpretation.
    Clark DA; Bowles RP
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(4):544-558. PubMed ID: 29683723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incremental Model Fit Assessment in the Case of Categorical Data: Tucker-Lewis Index for Item Response Theory Modeling.
    Cai L; Chung SW; Lee T
    Prev Sci; 2023 Apr; 24(3):455-466. PubMed ID: 33970410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Postpartum depression in the NICU: an examination of the factor structure of the Postpartum Depression Screening Scale.
    Blucker RT; Gillaspy JA; Jackson D; Hetherington C; Kyler K; Cherry A; McCaffree MA; Gillaspy SR
    Adv Neonatal Care; 2014 Dec; 14(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 25313799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Categorical Data.
    Savalei V
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(3):390-407. PubMed ID: 32054327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factor structure of the 10-item CES-D Scale among patients with persistent COVID-19.
    Ramírez-Vélez R; Olabarrieta-Landa L; Rivera D; Izquierdo M
    J Med Virol; 2023 Jan; 95(1):e28236. PubMed ID: 36258275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Local fit evaluation of structural equation models using graphical criteria.
    Thoemmes F; Rosseel Y; Textor J
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Mar; 23(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 28726444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adapting fit indices for Bayesian structural equation modeling: Comparison to maximum likelihood.
    Garnier-Villarreal M; Jorgensen TD
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Feb; 25(1):46-70. PubMed ID: 31180693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [French validation of the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale-VSSS-54F].
    Corbière M; Lesage A; Lauzon S; Ricard N; Reinharz D
    Encephale; 2003; 29(2):110-8. PubMed ID: 14567162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Poor Fit of Model Fit for Selecting Number of Factors in Exploratory Factor Analysis for Scale Evaluation.
    Montoya AK; Edwards MC
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Jun; 81(3):413-440. PubMed ID: 33994558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.