These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38166586)

  • 1. LooplessFluxSampler: an efficient toolbox for sampling the loopless flux solution space of metabolic models.
    Saa PA; Zapararte S; Drovandi CC; Nielsen LK
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 Jan; 25(1):3. PubMed ID: 38166586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ll-ACHRB: a scalable algorithm for sampling the feasible solution space of metabolic networks.
    Saa PA; Nielsen LK
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Aug; 32(15):2330-7. PubMed ID: 27153696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fast-SNP: a fast matrix pre-processing algorithm for efficient loopless flux optimization of metabolic models.
    Saa PA; Nielsen LK
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 32(24):3807-3814. PubMed ID: 27559155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accelerating flux balance calculations in genome-scale metabolic models by localizing the application of loopless constraints.
    Chan SHJ; Wang L; Dash S; Maranas CD
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Dec; 34(24):4248-4255. PubMed ID: 29868725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating the size of the solution space of metabolic networks.
    Braunstein A; Mulet R; Pagnani A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 9():240. PubMed ID: 18489757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CHRR: coordinate hit-and-run with rounding for uniform sampling of constraint-based models.
    Haraldsdóttir HS; Cousins B; Thiele I; Fleming RMT; Vempala S
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Jun; 33(11):1741-1743. PubMed ID: 28158334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. optGpSampler: an improved tool for uniformly sampling the solution-space of genome-scale metabolic networks.
    Megchelenbrink W; Huynen M; Marchiori E
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e86587. PubMed ID: 24551039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Elimination of thermodynamically infeasible loops in steady-state metabolic models.
    Schellenberger J; Lewis NE; Palsson BØ
    Biophys J; 2011 Feb; 100(3):544-553. PubMed ID: 21281568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of Monte Carlo sampling methods for metabolic network models.
    Fallahi S; Skaug HJ; Alendal G
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235393. PubMed ID: 32609776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monte Carlo sampling can be used to determine the size and shape of the steady-state flux space.
    Wiback SJ; Famili I; Greenberg HJ; Palsson BØ
    J Theor Biol; 2004 Jun; 228(4):437-47. PubMed ID: 15178193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A proof for loop-law constraints in stoichiometric metabolic networks.
    Noor E; Lewis NE; Milo R
    BMC Syst Biol; 2012 Nov; 6():140. PubMed ID: 23146116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CycleFreeFlux: efficient removal of thermodynamically infeasible loops from flux distributions.
    Desouki AA; Jarre F; Gelius-Dietrich G; Lercher MJ
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jul; 31(13):2159-65. PubMed ID: 25701569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uniform sampling of steady states in metabolic networks: heterogeneous scales and rounding.
    De Martino D; Mori M; Parisi V
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0122670. PubMed ID: 25849140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Obstructions to Sampling Qualitative Properties.
    Reimers AC
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135636. PubMed ID: 26287384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterizing the optimal flux space of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions through modified latin-hypercube sampling.
    Chaudhary N; Tøndel K; Bhatnagar R; dos Santos VA; Puchałka J
    Mol Biosyst; 2016 Mar; 12(3):994-1005. PubMed ID: 26818782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flux sampling is a powerful tool to study metabolism under changing environmental conditions.
    Herrmann HA; Dyson BC; Vass L; Johnson GN; Schwartz JM
    NPJ Syst Biol Appl; 2019; 5():32. PubMed ID: 31482008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adjusting for false discoveries in constraint-based differential metabolic flux analysis.
    Galuzzi BG; Milazzo L; Damiani C
    J Biomed Inform; 2024 Feb; 150():104597. PubMed ID: 38272432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating Metabolic Fluxes Using a Maximum Network Flexibility Paradigm.
    Megchelenbrink W; Rossell S; Huynen MA; Notebaart RA; Marchiori E
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139665. PubMed ID: 26457579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Convergence Rates for the Constrained Sampling via Langevin Monte Carlo.
    Zhu Y
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Aug; 25(8):. PubMed ID: 37628264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physiologically Shrinking the Solution Space of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genome-Scale Model Suggests the Role of the Metabolic Network in Shaping Gene Expression Noise.
    Chi B; Tao S; Liu Y
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139590. PubMed ID: 26448560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.