179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38166605)
1. Genomic dissection of additive and non-additive genetic effects and genomic prediction in an open-pollinated family test of Japanese larch.
Dong L; Xie Y; Zhang Y; Wang R; Sun X
BMC Genomics; 2024 Jan; 25(1):11. PubMed ID: 38166605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genomic studies with preselected markers reveal dominance effects influencing growth traits in Eucalyptus nitens.
Thumma BR; Joyce KR; Jacobs A
G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 34791210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple-trait analyses improved the accuracy of genomic prediction and the power of genome-wide association of productivity and climate change-adaptive traits in lodgepole pine.
Cappa EP; Chen C; Klutsch JG; Sebastian-Azcona J; Ratcliffe B; Wei X; Da Ros L; Ullah A; Liu Y; Benowicz A; Sadoway S; Mansfield SD; Erbilgin N; Thomas BR; El-Kassaby YA
BMC Genomics; 2022 Jul; 23(1):536. PubMed ID: 35870886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genomic Studies Reveal Substantial Dominant Effects and Improved Genomic Predictions in an Open-Pollinated Breeding Population of
Thavamanikumar S; Arnold RJ; Luo J; Thumma BR
G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Oct; 10(10):3751-3763. PubMed ID: 32788286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genomic Prediction of Additive and Non-additive Effects Using Genetic Markers and Pedigrees.
de Almeida Filho JE; Guimarães JFR; Fonsceca E Silva F; Vilela de Resende MD; Muñoz P; Kirst M; de Resende Júnior MFR
G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Aug; 9(8):2739-2748. PubMed ID: 31263059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genome-wide prediction using Bayesian additive regression trees.
Waldmann P
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):42. PubMed ID: 27286957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genomic and pedigree-based prediction for leaf, stem, and stripe rust resistance in wheat.
Juliana P; Singh RP; Singh PK; Crossa J; Huerta-Espino J; Lan C; Bhavani S; Rutkoski JE; Poland JA; Bergstrom GC; Sorrells ME
Theor Appl Genet; 2017 Jul; 130(7):1415-1430. PubMed ID: 28393303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of genomic selection for growth and wood quality traits in two control-pollinated progeny trials using exome capture as the genotyping platform in Norway spruce.
Chen ZQ; Baison J; Pan J; Karlsson B; Andersson B; Westin J; García-Gil MR; Wu HX
BMC Genomics; 2018 Dec; 19(1):946. PubMed ID: 30563448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mixed model methods for genomic prediction and variance component estimation of additive and dominance effects using SNP markers.
Da Y; Wang C; Wang S; Hu G
PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e87666. PubMed ID: 24498162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Increasing genomic prediction accuracy for unphenotyped full-sib families by modeling additive and dominance effects with large datasets in white spruce.
Nadeau S; Beaulieu J; Gezan SA; Perron M; Bousquet J; Lenz PRN
Front Plant Sci; 2023; 14():1137834. PubMed ID: 37035077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genomic prediction in maize breeding populations with genotyping-by-sequencing.
Crossa J; Beyene Y; Kassa S; Pérez P; Hickey JM; Chen C; de los Campos G; Burgueño J; Windhausen VS; Buckler E; Jannink JL; Lopez Cruz MA; Babu R
G3 (Bethesda); 2013 Nov; 3(11):1903-26. PubMed ID: 24022750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genome-Wide Prediction of Complex Traits in Two Outcrossing Plant Species Through Deep Learning and Bayesian Regularized Neural Network.
Maldonado C; Mora-Poblete F; Contreras-Soto RI; Ahmar S; Chen JT; do Amaral Júnior AT; Scapim CA
Front Plant Sci; 2020; 11():593897. PubMed ID: 33329658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genomic Predictions With Nonadditive Effects Improved Estimates of Additive Effects and Predictions of Total Genetic Values in
Calleja-Rodriguez A; Chen Z; Suontama M; Pan J; Wu HX
Front Plant Sci; 2021; 12():666820. PubMed ID: 34305966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genomic Model with Correlation Between Additive and Dominance Effects.
Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
Genetics; 2018 Jul; 209(3):711-723. PubMed ID: 29743175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increased Prediction Ability in Norway Spruce Trials Using a Marker X Environment Interaction and Non-Additive Genomic Selection Model.
Chen ZQ; Baison J; Pan J; Westin J; Gil MRG; Wu HX
J Hered; 2019 Dec; 110(7):830-843. PubMed ID: 31629368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genome-Enabled Estimates of Additive and Nonadditive Genetic Variances and Prediction of Apple Phenotypes Across Environments.
Kumar S; Molloy C; Muñoz P; Daetwyler H; Chagné D; Volz R
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2711-8. PubMed ID: 26497141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genomic relationships reveal significant dominance effects for growth in hybrid Eucalyptus.
Tan B; Grattapaglia D; Wu HX; Ingvarsson PK
Plant Sci; 2018 Feb; 267():84-93. PubMed ID: 29362102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficient weighting methods for genomic best linear-unbiased prediction (BLUP) adapted to the genetic architectures of quantitative traits.
Ren D; An L; Li B; Qiao L; Liu W
Heredity (Edinb); 2021 Feb; 126(2):320-334. PubMed ID: 32980863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genome-wide prediction for complex traits under the presence of dominance effects in simulated populations using GBLUP and machine learning methods.
Alves AAC; da Costa RM; Bresolin T; Fernandes Júnior GA; Espigolan R; Ribeiro AMF; Carvalheiro R; de Albuquerque LG
J Anim Sci; 2020 Jun; 98(6):. PubMed ID: 32474602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimation of Additive, Dominance, and Imprinting Genetic Variance Using Genomic Data.
Lopes MS; Bastiaansen JW; Janss L; Knol EF; Bovenhuis H
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2629-37. PubMed ID: 26438289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
