263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38166928)
1. Bilibili, TikTok, and YouTube as sources of information on gastric cancer: assessment and analysis of the content and quality.
Wang M; Yao N; Wang J; Chen W; Ouyang Y; Xie C
BMC Public Health; 2024 Jan; 24(1):57. PubMed ID: 38166928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok videos as sources of medical information on laryngeal carcinoma: cross-sectional content analysis study.
Liu Z; Chen Y; Lin Y; Ai M; Lian D; Zhang Y; Shen Y; Yu F
BMC Public Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):1594. PubMed ID: 38877432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. TikTok and Bilibili as sources of information on Helicobacter pylori in China: A content and quality analysis.
Du RC; Zhang Y; Wang MH; Lu NH; Hu Y
Helicobacter; 2023 Oct; 28(5):e13007. PubMed ID: 37452727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality and Reliability of Liver Cancer-Related Short Chinese Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study.
Zheng S; Tong X; Wan D; Hu C; Hu Q; Ke Q
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Jul; 25():e47210. PubMed ID: 37405825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality of Information in Gallstone Disease Videos on TikTok: Cross-sectional Study.
Sun F; Zheng S; Wu J
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Feb; 25():e39162. PubMed ID: 36753307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is the information about orthodontics on Youtube and TikTok reliable for the oral health of the public? A cross sectional comparative study.
Kılınç DD
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Oct; 123(5):e349-e354. PubMed ID: 35470122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. TikTok and YouTube as sources of information on anal fissure: A comparative analysis.
Chen Z; Pan S; Zuo S
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():1000338. PubMed ID: 36407987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of the reliability and quality of breast cancer related videos on TikTok and Bilibili: cross-sectional study in China.
Liu H; Peng J; Li L; Deng A; Huang X; Yin G; Ming J; Luo H; Liang Y
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1296386. PubMed ID: 38317686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.
Zhang X; Yang Y; Shen YW; Zhang KR; Ma LT; Ding C; Wang BY; Meng Y; Liu H
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():972348. PubMed ID: 36211682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short-Video Apps as a Health Information Source for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Information Quality Assessment of TikTok Videos.
Song S; Xue X; Zhao YC; Li J; Zhu Q; Zhao M
J Med Internet Res; 2021 Dec; 23(12):e28318. PubMed ID: 34931996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. TikTok as a Health Information Source: Assessment of the Quality of Information in Diabetes-Related Videos.
Kong W; Song S; Zhao YC; Zhu Q; Sha L
J Med Internet Res; 2021 Sep; 23(9):e30409. PubMed ID: 34468327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of videos about vesicoureteral reflux on YouTube.
Toksoz A; Duran MB
J Pediatr Urol; 2021 Dec; 17(6):858.e1-858.e6. PubMed ID: 34756784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. TikTok video as a health education source of information on heart failure in China: a content analysis.
Gong X; Dong B; Li L; Shen D; Rong Z
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1315393. PubMed ID: 38146471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality and Audience Engagement of Takotsubo Syndrome-Related Videos on TikTok: Content Analysis.
Liang J; Wang L; Song S; Dong M; Xu Y; Zuo X; Zhang J; Adrian Sherif A; Ehsan J; Ma J; Li P
J Med Internet Res; 2022 Sep; 24(9):e39360. PubMed ID: 36155486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality of Online Video Resources Concerning Patient Education for the Meniscus: A YouTube-Based Quality-Control Study.
Kunze KN; Krivicich LM; Verma NN; Chahla J
Arthroscopy; 2020 Jan; 36(1):233-238. PubMed ID: 31864582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality analysis of testicular cancer videos on YouTube.
Duran MB; Kizilkan Y
Andrologia; 2021 Sep; 53(8):e14118. PubMed ID: 34009641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality of Internet Videos Related to Pediatric Urology in Mainland China: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Bai G; Fu K; Fu W; Liu G
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():924748. PubMed ID: 35784238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Reliability and Quality of Short Videos as a Source of Dietary Guidance for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Cross-sectional Study.
He Z; Wang Z; Song Y; Liu Y; Kang L; Fang X; Wang T; Fan X; Li Z; Wang S; Bai Y
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Feb; 25():e41518. PubMed ID: 36757757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality Assessment of YouTube Videos as an Information Source for Testicular Torsion.
Bai G; Pan X; Zhao T; Chen X; Liu G; Fu W
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():905609. PubMed ID: 35664123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A quality analysis of nocturnal enuresis videos on YouTube.
Toprak T; Tokat E
J Pediatr Urol; 2021 Aug; 17(4):449.e1-449.e6. PubMed ID: 33824069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]